Exploring literacy in Social Work Education: A social practices approach to student writing

Social Work Education

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 149-162

  Rai, Lucy ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diversity; Education; Literacy; Non traditional Students; Social Practices; Social Work; Student Writing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050714524     PISSN: 02615479     EISSN: 14701227     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0261547042000209170     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Althusser L, (1969) ‘Ideology and ideological state apparatus’ in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays Monthly Review Press
2. Bakhtin MM, (1981) The Dialogic Imagination University of Texas Press, Austin, TX
3. Bowl, M. (2000). ‘Experiencing the barriers: Non‐traditional students entering higher education’. Research Papers in Education, vol. 16 (no. 2): pp. 141–160
4. DoH (2002) Requirements for Social Work Training Department of Health, London
5. Erikson E, (1980) Identity and the Life Cycle Norton & Co, London
6. Fairclough N, (1989) Language & Power Longman, London
7. General Social Care Council (2002) Accreditation of Universities to Grant Degrees in Social Work General Social Care Council, London
8. Hall S, (1996) Questions of Cultural Identity Sage, London
9. Ivanic R, (1998) Writing and Identity John Benjamin's Publishing House, Amsterdam
10. Lea, M. (1998). ‘Academic literacies and learning in higher education: Constructing knowledge through texts and experience’. Studies in the Education of Adults, vol. 30 (no. 2)
11. Lea, M. & Stierer, B. (eds) (2000) Student Writing in Higher Education: New Contexts Open University Press, Buckingham
12. Lillis T, (2001) Student Writing Routledge, London
13. Lillis, T. (2003). ‘Student writing as “academic literacies”: Drawing on Bakhtin to move from critique to design’. Language and Education, vol. 17 (no. 3)
14. Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education (2000) Subject Benchmark Statements QAAHE Gloucester
15. Tajfel H, (1982) Social Identity and Intergroup Relations Cambridge University Press, Cambridge