Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D Exchange and DPV Initiative

Pediatric Diabetes

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2018, Pages 1271-1275

  DeSalvo, Daniel J ^a   Miller, Kellee M ^b   Hermann, Julia M ^c,d   Maahs, David M ^e   Hofer, Sabine E ^f   Clements, Mark A ^g   Lilienthal, Eggert ^h   Sherr, Jennifer L ⁱ   Tauschmann, Martin ^j   Holl, Reinhard W ^c,d  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JAEB CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ULM   (Germany)

^d GERMAN CENTER FOR DIABETES RESEARCH DZD   (Germany)

^e STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^h RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

ⁱ YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^j MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF GRAZ   (Austria)

more..

Author keywords

continuous glucose monitoring; longitudinal analysis; type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE REGISTRY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; GENDER; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANALYSIS; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTRONIC DEVICE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REGISTER; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REGISTRIES; WEARABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES;

EID: 85050527456     PISSN: 1399543X     EISSN: 13995448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/pedi.12711     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Miller KM, Foster NC, Beck RW, et al. Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:971-978
2. Schwandt A, Hermann JM, Rosenbauer J, et al. Longitudinal trajectories of metabolic control from childhood to young adulthood in type 1 diabetes from a large German/Austrian Registry: a group-based modeling approach. Diabetes Care. 2017;40:309-316
3. Beck RW, Riddlesworth T, Ruedy K, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using insulin injections: the DIAMOND randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317:371-378
4. Lind M, Polonsky W, Hirsch IB, et al. Design and methods of a randomized trial of continuous glucose monitoring in persons with type 1 diabetes with impaired glycemic control treated with multiple daily insulin injections (GOLD Study). J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2016;10:754-761
5. Tamborlane WV, Beck RW, Bode BW, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1464-1476
6. Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2702-2709
7. Karges B, Schwandt A, Heidtmann B, et al. Association of insulin pump therapy vs insulin injection therapy with severe hypoglycemia, ketoacidosis, and glycemic control among children, adolescents, and young adults with type 1 diabetes. JAMA. 2017;318:1358-1366
8. Facchinetti A. Continuous glucose monitoring sensors: past, present and future algorithmic challenges. Sensors (Basel). 2016;16(12):2093
9. Castle JR, DeVries JH, Kovatchev B. Future of automated insulin delivery systems. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017;19:S67-S72