Judicial Review of the War Power

Presidential Studies Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 466-495

  Fisher, Louis ^a  

^a Congressional Research Service ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85050415125     PISSN: 03604918     EISSN: 17415705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5705.2005.00260.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Champlin, Linda, and Alan Schwarz. 1985. Political question doctrine and the allocation of the foreign affairs power. Hofstra Law Review 13: 215-56.
2. Corn, Geoffrey S. 1998. Presidential war power: Do the courts offer any answers? Military Law Review 157: 180-255.
3. Corwin, Edward A. 1957. The president: Office and powers. New York: New York University Press.
4. Devins, Neal, and Louis Fisher. 2002. The Steel Seizure Case: One of a kind? Constitutional Commentary 19: 63-86.
5. Finkelstein, Maurice. 1924. Judicial self-limitation. Harvard Law Review 37: 338-64.
6. Firmage, Edwin B. 1977. The war powers and the political question doctrine. University of Colorado Law Review 49: 65-101.
7. Fisher, Louis. 2003. Nazi saboteurs on trial: A military tribunal and presidential power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
8. Fisher, Louis. 2004. Presidential war power. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
9. Fisher, Louis. 2005a. Scholarly support for presidential wars. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35: 590-607.
10. Fisher, Louis. 2005b. Military tribunals and presidential power: American Revolution to the war on terrorism. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
11. Franck, Thomas M. 1992. Political questions/judicial answers: Does the rule of law apply to foreign affairs? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12. Glennon, Michael J. 1990. Constitutional diplomacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Gold, A. E. 1923. Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court over political questions: What is a political question? Cornell Law Quarterly 9: 50-54.
14. Graebner, Dianne Bennett. 197374. Judicial activity and public attitude: A quantitative study of Selective Service sentencing in the Vietnam War period. Buffalo Law Review 23: 465-98.
15. Henkin, Louis. 1996. Foreign affairs and the United States Constitution. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
16. Hughes, Graham. 1968. Civil disobedience and the political question doctrine. New York University Law Review 43: 1-19.
17. Kritzer, Herbert M. 1977. Political correlates of the behavior of federal district judges: A “best case” analysis. Journal of Politics 40: 25-58.
18. Kritzer, Herbert M. 1979. Federal judges and their political environment. American Journal of Political Science 12: 194-207.
19. Loeb, Louis. 1969. The courts and Vietnam. American University Law Review 18: 376-97.
20. May, Christopher N. 1989. In the name of war: Judicial review and the war powers since 1918. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. Moore, John Norton. 1969. The justiciability of challenges to the use of military forces abroad. Virginia Journal of International Law 10: 85-107.
22. Neustadt, Richard E. 1964. Presidential power. New York: Signet Books.
23. Post, Charles Gordon, Jr. 1936. The Supreme Court and political questions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
24. Redish, Martin. 198485. Judicial review and the “political question.” Northwestern University Law Review 79: 1031-61.
25. Rehnquist, William H. 1987. The Supreme Court: How it was, how it is. New York: Morrow.
26. Richardson, James P., ed. 1897. A compilation of the messages and papers of the presidents. Washington, DC: Bureau of National Literature.
27. Schwartz, Warren F., and Wayne McCormack. 1968. The justiciability of legal objections to the American military effort in Vietnam. Texas Law Review 46: 1033-53.
28. Sheffer, Martin S. 1999. The judicial development of presidential war powers. Westport, CT: Praeger.
29. Tigar, Michael E. 1970. Judicial power, the “political question doctrine,” and foreign relations. UCLA Review 17: 1135-79.
30. Velvel, Lawrence. 1968. The war in Viet Nam: Unconstitutional, justiciable, and jurisdictionally attackable. Kansas Law Review 16: 449-503(e).
31. Weston, Melville Fuller. 1925. Political questions. Harvard Law Review 38: 296-333.
32. Wormuth, Francis D., and Edwin B. Firmage. 1986. To chain the dog of war: The war power of Congress in history and law. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.