Volume introduction: The human and social experience of assessment: Valuing the person and context

Handbook of Human and Social Conditions in Assessment

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 1-17

  Harris, Lois R ^a   Brown, Gavin T L ^b  

^a CENTRAL QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85049843200     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315749136-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Assessment Reform Group. (2002). Assessment for learning: 10 principles. Research-based principles to guide classroom practice. Cambridge, UK: Assessment Reform Group.
2. Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
3. Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2004). Working inside the black box: Assessment for learning in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(1), 8-21.
4. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
5. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54(2), 199-231.
6. Bonner, S. M. (2013). Validity in classroom assessment: Purposes, properties, and principles. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE Handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 87-106). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7. Brookhart, S. M. (2003). Developing measurement theory for classroom assessment purposes and uses. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 5-12. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00139.x
8. Brookhart, S. M. (2013). The public understanding of assessment in educational reform in the United States. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 52-71. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764751
9. Brown, G.T.L. (2008). Conceptions of assessment: Understanding what assessment means to teachers and students. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
10. Brown, G.T.L. (2015, February). The qualitative secret within quantitative research: It’s not just about numbers. Paper presented at the International Scientific Conference: Modern Approach to Social and Educational Research. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/1zSW16J
11. Burns, R. (1785). To a mouse, on turning her up in her nest with the plough. Burns Country. Retrieved December 4, 2015 from http://www.robertburns.org/works/75.shtml
12. Camilli, G. (1996). Standard errors in educational assessment: A policy analysis perspective. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 4(4), 1-17.
13. Chamberlain, S. (2013). Communication strategies for enhancing qualification users’ understanding of educational assessment: Recommendations from other public interest fields. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 114-127. doi:10.1080/03054985.2013.764757
14. Cizek, G. J., Fitzgerald, S., Shawn, M., & Rachor, R. E. (1995). Teachers’ assessment practices: Preparation, isolation and the kitchen sink. Educational Assessment, 3, 159-179.
15. Cronbach, L. J., Bradburn, N. M., & Horvitz, D. G. (1995). A valedictory: Reflections on 60 years in educational testing. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. L. (2013). Opportunities and obstacles to consider when using peer- and self-assessment to improve student learning: Case studies into teachers’ implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 101-111. doi: HYPERLINK “http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008" \t “doilink” 10.1016/j.tate.2013.07.008
18. Kahn, E. A. (2000). A case study of assessment in a grade 10 English course. The Journal of Educational Research, 93, 276-286.
19. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. London: Penguin Books.
20. Kane, M. T. (2006). Validation. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 17-64). Westport, CT: Praeger.
21. Kane, M. T. (2013). Validity and fairness in the testing of individuals. In M. Chatterji (Ed.), Validity and test use: An international dialogue on educational assessment, accountability and equity (pp. 17-53). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
22. Klenowski, V., & Wyatt-Smith, C. (2012). The impact of high stakes testing: The Australian story. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 65-79. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2011.592972
23. McMillan, J. H. (2001). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective instruction (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Messick, S. (1984). The psychology of educational measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 21(3), 215-237. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1984.tb01030.x
25. Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. L. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13-103). Old Tappan, NJ: MacMillan.
26. Newton, P. E. (2007). Clarifying the purposes of educational assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 149-170.
27. Newton, P. E. (2013). Ofqual’s reliability programme: A case study exploring the potential to improve public understanding and confidence. Oxford Review of Education, 39(1), 93-113. doi:10.1080/03054985.2012.760285
28. Nichols, S. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2007). Collateral damage: How high-stakes testing corrupts America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
29. Parkes, J. (2013). Reliability in classroom assessment. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 107-123). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
30. Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 758-765.
31. Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(4), 433-449. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2011.582838
32. Thompson, G. (2013). NAPLAN, MySchool and Accountability: Teacher perceptions of the effects of testing. The International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 62-84.
33. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
34. Wyatt-Smith, C., & Klenowski, V. (2012). Explicit, latent and meta-criteria: Types of criteria at play in professional judgement practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 35-52. doi:10.1080/0969594x.2012.725030
35. Wyatt-Smith, C., Klenowski, V., & Gunn, S. (2010). The centrality of teachers’ judgement practice in assessment: A study of standards in moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 59-75. doi:10.1080/09695940903565610
36. Zeman, N. (2001, April). Michael Ovitz, take two. Vanity Fair. Retrieved October 18, 2015 from http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2001/04/ovitz-200104
37. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.