CO-dependent hydrogen production by the facultative anaerobe Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Mohr, Teresa ^a   Aliyu, Habibu ^a   Küchlin, Raphael ^a   Polliack, Shamara ^b   Zwick, Michaela ^a   Neumann, Anke ^a   Cowan, Don ^b   Maayer, Pieter ^c  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA   (South Africa)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Biohydrogen production; Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase; Hydrogenase; Parageobacillus thermoglucosidasius; Water gas shift reaction

Indexed keywords

BIOFUEL; CARBON MONOXIDE; CARBON MONOXIDE DEHYDROGENASE; HYDROGEN; HYDROGENASE; ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE; BACTERIAL PROTEIN; IRON HYDROGENASE; IRON SULFUR PROTEIN; MULTIENZYME COMPLEX;

ANAEROBIC BACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL GROWTH; BACTERIUM CULTURE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; CATALYSIS; CHEMICAL REACTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENERGY RESOURCE; ENERGY YIELD; GENOMICS; HYDROGENATION; NONHUMAN; PARAGEOBACILLUS THERMOGLUCOSIDASIUS; RENEWABLE ENERGY; THERMOPHILIC BACTERIUM; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; BACILLUS; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; GENETICS; METABOLISM;

ALDEHYDE OXIDOREDUCTASES; ANAEROBIOSIS; BACILLUS; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; BASE COMPOSITION; CARBON MONOXIDE; HYDROGEN; HYDROGENASE; IRON-SULFUR PROTEINS; MULTIENZYME COMPLEXES;

EID: 85049779947     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-018-0954-3     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2017. 2017. https://www.iea.org/weo2017. Accessed 26 Mar 2018.
2. Nikolaidis P, Poullikkas A. A comparative overview of hydrogen production processes. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2017;67:597-611.
3. Hosseini S, Wahid M. Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2016;57:850-66.
4. Claassen PAM, van Lier JB, Lopez Contreras AM, van Niel EWJ, Sijtsma L, Stams AJM, et al. Utilisation of biomass for the supply of energy carriers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;52:741-55.
5. Kothari R, Buddhi D, Sawhney RL. Comparison of environmental and economic aspects of various hydrogen production methods. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2008;12:553-63.
6. Sokolova TG, Henstra AM, Sipma J, Parshina SN, Stams AJM, Lebedinsky AV. Diversity and ecophysiological features of thermophilic carboxydotrophic anaerobes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;68:131-41.
7. 2 production by genetically engineered Thermococcus onnurineus NA1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2048-53.
8. Barnard D, Casanueva A, Tuffin M, Cowan D. Extremophiles in biofuel synthesis. Environ Technol. 2010;31:871-88.
9. Maness PC, Weaver PF. Hydrogen production from a carbon-monoxide oxidation pathway in Rubrivivax gelatinosus. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2002;27:1407-11.
10. Diender M, Stams AJM, Sousa DZ, Robb FT, Guiot SR. Pathways and bioenergetics of anaerobic carbon monoxide fermentation. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1-18.
11. Wang J, Wan W. Effect of temperature on fermentative hydrogen production by mixed cultures. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 2008;33:5392-7.
12. Oelgeschlaeger E, Rother M. Carbon monoxide-dependent energy metabolism in anaerobic bacteria and archaea. Arch Microbiol. 2008;190:257-69.
13. Techtmann SM, Colman AS, Robb FT. 'That which does not kill us only makes us stronger': the role of carbon monoxide in thermophilic microbial consortia. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:1027-37.
14. 2 inhibition of Ni-containing CO dehydrogenase is partly reversible. Chem Eur J. 2015;21:18934-8.
15. Juszczak A, Aono S, Adams MW. The extremely thermophilic eubacterium, Thermotoga maritima, contains a novel iron-hydrogenase whose cellular activity is dependent upon tungsten. J Biol Chem. 1991;266:13834-41.
16. Tirado-Acevedo O, Chinn MS, Grunden AM. Production of biofuels from synthesis gas using microbial catalysts. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2010;70:57-92.
17. Søndergaard D, Pedersen CNS, Greening C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1-8.
18. Grant JR, Stothard P. The CGView Server: a comparative genomics tool for circular genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:181-4.
19. Besemer J, Lomsadze A, Borodovsky M. GeneMarkS: a self-training method for prediction of gene starts in microbial genomes. Implications for finding sequence motifs in regulatory regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:2607-18.
20. Hall TA. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser. 1999;41:95-8.
21. Wallace IM, Sullivan OO, Higgins DG, Notredame C. M-Coffee: combining multiple sequence alignment methods with T-Coffee. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:1692-9.
22. Talavera G, Castresana J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst Biol. 2007;56:564-77.
23. Guindon S, Gascuel O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696-704.
24. Lefort V, Longueville J, Gascuel O. SMS: smart model selection in PhyML. Mol Biol Evol. 2017;34:2422-4.
25. 2 is a widely utilised energy source for microbial growth and survival. ISME J. 2016;10:761-77.
26. Vignais PM, Billoud B. Occurrence, classification, and biological function of hydrogenases: an overview. Chem Rev. 2007;107:4206-72.
27. Sargent F, Bogsch EG, Stanley NR, Wexler M, Robinson C, Berks BC, et al. Overlapping functions of components of a bacterial Sec-independent protein export pathway. EMBO J. 1998;17:3640-50.
28. Dutta D, De D, Chaudhuri S, Bhattacharya SK. Hydrogen production by cyanobacteria. Microb Cell Fact. 2005;4:36-46.
29. Esteves-Ferreira AA, Cavalcanti JHF, Vaz MGMV, Alvarenga LV, Nunes-Nesi A, Araújo WL. Cyanobacterial nitrogenases: phylogenetic diversity, regulation and functional predictions. Genet Mol Biol. 2017;40:261-75.
30. Holmqvist M, Lindberg P, Agervald Å, Stensjö K, Lindblad P. Transcript analysis of the extended hyp-operon in the cyanobacteria Nostoc sp. strain PCC 7120 and Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133. BMC Res Notes. 2011;4:186.
31. Andrews SC, Berks BC, McClay J, Ambler A, Quail MA, Golby P, et al. A 12-cistron Escherichia coli operon (hyf) encoding a putative proton-translocating formate hydrogenlyase system. Microbiology. 1997;143:3633-47.
32. Chan K-H, Lee K-M, Wong K-B. Interaction between hydrogenase maturation factors HypA and HypB is required for [NiFe]-hydrogenase maturation. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e32592.
33. 2 sensing in Alcaligenes eutrophus. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1998;95:12474-9.
34. Vignais PM, Elsen S, Colbeau A. Transcriptional regulation of the uptake [NiFe] hydrogenase genes in Rhodobacter capsulatus. Biochem Soc Trans. 2005;33:28-32.
35. Maier T, Binder U, Böck A. Analysis of the hydA locus of Escherichia coli: two genes (hydN and hypF) involved in formate and hydrogen metabolism. Arch Microbiol. 1996;165:333-41.
36. Mukherjee M, Vajpai M, Sankararamakrishnan R. Anion-selective formate/nitrite transporters: taxonomic distribution, phylogenetic analysis and subfamily-specific conservation pattern in prokaryotes. BMC Genomics. 2017;18:1-19.
37. Thomé R, Gust A, Toci R, Mendel R, Bittner F, Magalon A, et al. A sulfurtransferase is essential for activity of formate dehydrogenases in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:4671-8.
38. Ragsdale SW. Life with carbon monoxide. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2004;39:165-95.
39. Techtmann SM, Lebedinski AV, Colman AS, Sokolova TG, Woyke T, Goodwin L, et al. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer of anaerobic carbon monoxide dehydrogenases. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:1-16.
40. Wu M, Ren Q, Durkin AS, Daugherty SC, Brinkac LM, Dodson RJ, et al. Life in hot carbon monoxide: the complete genome sequence of Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans Z-2901. PloS Genet. 2005;1:e60.
41. Fox JD, Kerby RL, Roberts GP, Ludden PW. Characterization of the CO-induced, CO-tolerant hydrogenase from Rhodospirillum rubrum and the gene encoding the large subunit of the enzyme. J Bacteriol. 1996;178:1515-24.
42. 2 -evolving enzyme complex from Carboxydothermus hydrogenoformans. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:5712-21.
43. 2 -metabolizing prokaryotes. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thomson F, editors. The prokaryotes: prokaryotic physiology and biochemistry. Berlin: Springer; 2013. p. 119-99.