The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease. The HUNT study

Journal of Neurology

Volumn 265, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 2120-2124

  Hustad, Eldbjørg ^a,b   Skogholt, Anne Heidi ^b   Hveem, Kristian ^b   Aasly, Jan O ^b,c  

^a Møre and Romsdal Health Trust   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c TRONDHEIM UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

Biomarkers; Diagnostic accuracy; Health registers; Parkinson disease

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PARKINSON DISEASE; PARKINSONISM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; NORWAY; REGISTER;

DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF DISEASES; NORWAY; PARKINSON DISEASE; PARKINSON DISEASE, SECONDARY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES;

EID: 85049697624     PISSN: 03405354     EISSN: 14321459     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-018-8969-6     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Braak H et al (2003) Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 24(2):197–211
2. Rizzo G et al (2016) Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 86(6):566–576
3. Roberts CL et al (2008) The accuracy of reporting of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in population health data. Hypertens Pregnancy 27(3):285–297
4. O’Malley KJ et al (2005) Measuring diagnoses: ICD code accuracy. Health Serv Res 40(5 Pt 2):1620–1639
5. Tolosa E, Wenning G, Poewe W (2006) The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 5(1):75–86
6. Jankovic J (2008) Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79(4):368–376
7. Postuma RB et al (2015) MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 30(12):1591–1601
8. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J (2003) Narrative electronic patient records as source of discharge diagnoses. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 71(3):261–268
9. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J (2005) Consequences of impaired data quality on information retrieval in electronic patient records. Int J Med Inform 74(5):387–394
10. Mikkelsen G, Aasly J (2001) Concordance of information in parallel electronic and paper based patient records. Int J Med Inform 63(3):123–131
11. Lacey JV Jr, Savage KE (2016) 50% Response rates: half-empty, or half-full? Cancer Causes Control 27(6):805–808
12. Krokstad S et al (2013) Cohort profile: the HUNT study, Norway. Int J Epidemiol 42(4):968–977
13. Wei WQ, Denny JC (2015) Extracting research-quality phenotypes from electronic health records to support precision medicine. Genome Med 7(1):41
14. Beaulieu-Jones BK, Greene CS (2016) Semi-supervised learning of the electronic health record for phenotype stratification. J Biomed Inform 64:168–178