Developing a hierarchical structure of the co-benefits of the triple bottom line under uncertainty

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 195, Issue , 2018, Pages 908-918

  Wu, Kuo Jui ^a   Zhu, Yafang ^a   Tseng, Ming Lang ^b   Lim, Ming K ^c   Xue, Bing ^d  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b ASIA UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c CHONGQING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED SUSTAINABILITY STUDIES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Co benefits; Grey theory; Interpretive structural modeling; Triple bottom line

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

CO BENEFITS; GLOBAL ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY; GREY THEORY; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; HYBRID METHOD; INTERPRETIVE STRUCTURAL MODELING; KEY PRACTICES; TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE;

ELECTRONICS INDUSTRY;

EID: 85049300736     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.264     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., A stochastic approach for sustainability analysis under the green economics paradigm. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 28:7 (2014), 1743–1753.
2. Ahi, P., Searcy, C., Assessing sustainability in the supply chain: a triple bottom line approach. Appl. Math. Model. 39:10 (2015), 2882–2896.
3. Balaban, O., Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., Sustainable buildings for healthier cities: assessing the co-benefits of green buildings in Japan. J. Clean. Prod. 163 (2017), 68–78.
4. Balbus, J.M., Greenblatt, J.B., Chari, R., Millstein, D., Ebi, K.L., A wedge-based approach to estimating health co-benefits of climate change mitigation activities in the United States. Climatic Change 127:2 (2014), 199–210.
5. Burtraw, D., Krupnick, A., Palmer, K., Paul, A., Toman, M., Bloyd, C., Ancillary benefits of reduced air pollution in the US from moderate greenhouse gas mitigation policies in the electricity sector. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45:3 (2003), 650–673.
6. Carter, C.R., Rogers, D.S., A hierarchical structure of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 38:5 (2008), 360–387.
7. Carvalho, H., Govindan, K., Azevedo, S.G., Cruz-Machado, V., Modelling green and lean supply chains: an eco-efficiency perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 120 (2017), 75–87.
8. Chae, Y., Co-benefit analysis of an air quality management plan and greenhouse gas reduction strategies in the Seoul metropolitan area. Environ. Sci. Pol. 13:3 (2010), 205–216.
9. Cui, L., Fuzzy approach to eco-innovation for enhancing business functions: a case study in China. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117:5 (2017), 967–987.
10. Deng, J.L., Control problem of grey systems. Syst. Contr. Lett. 1:5 (1982), 288–294.
11. Depken, D., Zeman, C., Small business challenges and the triple bottom line, TBL: needs assessment in a Midwest State, USA. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2017 article (in press).
12. Dou, Y., Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Evaluating green supplier development programs with a grey-analytical network process-based methodology. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 233:2 (2014), 420–431.
13. Esquer-Peralta, J., Sustainability Management Systems (SMS): an Integrated Approach to Management Systems towards Sustainable Development. PhD Dissertation, 2007, University of Massachusetts Lowell, USA.
14. Elkington, J., Cannibals with Forks. The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. 1997 (Capstone, Oxford).
15. Fairley, S., Tyler, B.D., Kellett, P., D'Elia, K., The formula one Australian grand prix: exploring the triple bottom line. Sport Manag. Rev. 14:2 (2011), 141–152.
16. Geng, Y., Ma, Z., Xue, B., Ren, W., Liu, Z., Fujita, T., Co-benefit evaluation for urban public transportation sector–a case of Shenyang, China. J. Clean. Prod. 58 (2013), 82–91.
17. Gimenez, C., Sierra, V., Rodon, J., Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140:1 (2012), 149–159.
18. Haines, A., Sustainable policies to improve health and prevent climate change. Soc. Sci. Med. 74:5 (2012), 680–683.
19. Hennessey, R., Pittman, J., Morand, A., Douglas, A., Co-benefits of integrating climate change adaptation and mitigation in the Canadian energy sector. Energy Pol. 111 (2017), 214–221.
20. Jiang, P., Xu, B., Geng, Y., Dong, W., Chen, Y., Xue, B., Assessing the environmental sustainability with a co-benefits approach: a study of industrial sector in Baoshan District in Shanghai. J. Clean. Prod. 114 (2016), 114–123.
21. Kannan, D., Diabat, A., Shankar, K.M., Analyzing the drivers of end-of-life tire management using interpretive structural modeling (ISM). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 72:9–12 (2014), 1603–1614.
22. Kim, H.W., Dong, L., Choi, A.E.S., Fujii, M., Fujita, T., Park, H.S., Co-benefit potential of industrial and urban symbiosis using waste heat from industrial park in Ulsan, Korea. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135 (2018), 225–234.
23. Kwan, S.C., Hashim, J.H., A review on co-benefits of mass public transportation in climate change mitigation. Sustainable Cities and Society 22 (2016), 11–18.
24. Lim, M.K., Tseng, M.L., Tan, K.H., Bui, T.D., Knowledge management in sustainable supply chain management: improving performance through an interpretive structural modelling approach. J. Clean. Prod. 162 (2017), 806–816.
25. Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Mangla, S.K., Structural model for sustainable consumption and production adoption - a grey-DEMATEL based approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 125 (2017), 198–207.
26. Matthews, E., Sattler, M., Friedland, C., A critical analysis of hazard resilience measures within sustainability assessment hierarchical structures. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 49 (2014), 59–69.
27. Musich, S., Hook, D., Barnett, T., Edington, D.W., The association between health risk status and health care costs among the membership of an Australian health plan. Health Promot. Int. 18:1 (2003), 57–65.
28. Nieuwenhuis, P., Katsifou, E., More sustainable automotive production through understanding decoupling points in leagile manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 95 (2015), 232–241.
29. Norman, W., MacDonald, C., Getting to the bottom of “triple bottom line”. Bus. Ethics Q. 14:2 (2004), 243–262.
30. Puppim de Oliveira, J.A.P., Doll, C.N., Kurniawan, T.A., Geng, Y., Kapshe, M., Huisingh, D., Promoting win–win situations in climate change mitigation, local environmental quality and development in Asian cities through co-benefits. J. Clean. Prod. 58 (2013), 1–6.
31. Palvia, P., Baqir, N., Nemati, H., ICT for socio-economic development: a citizens' perspective. Inf. Manag. 55:2 (2018), 160–176.
32. Pagell, M., Gobeli, D., How plant managers' experiences and attitudes toward sustainability relate to operational performance. Prod. Oper. Manag. 18:3 (2009), 278–299.
33. Pathak, M., Shukla, P.R., Co-benefits of low carbon passenger transport actions in Indian cities: case study of Ahmedabad. Transport. Res. Transport Environ. 44 (2016), 303–316.
34. Rajesh, R., Ravi, V., Modeling enablers of supply chain risk mitigation in electronic supply chains: a Grey–DEMATEL approach. Comput. Ind. Eng. 87 (2015), 126–139.
35. Sénéchal, O., Research directions for integrating the triple bottom line in maintenance dashboards. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 331–342.
36. Singh, G.G., Cisneros-Montemayor, A.M., Swartz, W., Cheung, W., Guy, J.A., Kenny, T.A., Sumaila, R., A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among Sustainable Development Goals. Marine Policy 93 (2018), 223–231.
37. Song, M., Guan, Y., Wang, J., Zhao, J., Evaluation of urban industrial ecological transformation in China. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 18:8 (2016), 2649–2662.
38. Su, C.M., Horng, D.J., Tseng, M.L., Chiu, A.S., Wu, K.J., Chen, H.P., Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach. J. Clean. Prod. 134 (2016), 469–481.
39. Shi, L., Wu, K.J., Tseng, M.L., Improving corporate sustainable development: using an interdependence hierarchical model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 119 (2017), 24–35.
40. Thompson, B.L., Nelson, D.E., Caldwell, B., Harris, J.R., Assessment of health risk behaviors: a tool to inform consumers, providers, health care organizations, and purchasers. Am. J. Prev. Med. 16:1 (1999), 48–59.
41. Tian, X., Chang, M., Shi, F., Tanikawa, H., How does industrial structure change impact carbon dioxide emissions? A comparative analysis focusing on nine provincial regions in China. Environ. Sci. Pol. 37 (2014), 243–254.
42. Tseng, M.L., Tan, K.H., Geng, Y., Govindan, K., Sustainable consumption and production in emerging markets 181:B (2016), 257–261.
43. Tseng, M.L., Wu, K.J., Ma, L., Kuo, T.C., Sai, F., A hierarchical structure for assessing corporate sustainability performance using a hybrid fuzzy synthetic method-DEMATEL. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 2018 article (in press).
44. Tseng, M.L., Chiu, A.S.F., Dong, L., Sustainable consumption and production in business decision-making models. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (2018), 118–121.
45. Wang, L., Ma, L., Wu, K.J., Chiu, A.S.F., Nathaphan, S., Applying fuzzy interpretive structural modeling to evaluate responsible consumption and production under uncertainty. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 118:2 (2018), 432–462.
46. Warfield, J.N., Developing subsystem matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1 (1974), 74–80.
47. Woodside, A.G., Bernal, P.M., Coduras, A., The general theory of culture, entrepreneurship, innovation, and quality-of-life: comparing nurturing versus thwarting enterprise start-ups in BRIC, Denmark, Germany, and the United States. Ind. Market. Manag. 53 (2016), 136–159.
48. Wise, N., Outlining triple bottom line contexts in urban tourism regeneration. Cities 53 (2016), 30–34.
49. Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M.L., Chiu, A.S., Exploring decisive factors in green supply chain practices under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 159 (2015), 147–157.
50. Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M., Chiu, K.K.S., Multi-attribute approach to sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 116:4 (2016), 777–800.
51. Wu, K.J., Liao, C.J., Tseng, M.L., Lim, M.K., Hu, J., Tan, K., Toward sustainability: using big data to explore the decisive attributes of supply chain risks and uncertainties. J. Clean. Prod. 142 (2017), 663–676.
52. Wu, K.J., Cui, L., Tseng, M.L., Hu, J., Huy, P.M., Applying big data with fuzzy dematel to discover the critical factors for employee engagement in developing sustainability for the hospitality industry under uncertainty. In Supply Chain Management in the Big Data Era, 2017, IGI Global, 218–253.
53. Xia, X., Govindan, K., Zhu, Q., Analyzing internal barriers for automotive parts remanufacturers in China using grey-DEMATEL approach. J. Clean. Prod. 87 (2015), 811–825.
54. Xue, B., Ma, Z., Geng, Y., Heck, P., Ren, W., Tobias, M., Fujita, T., A life cycle co-benefits assessment of wind power in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 41 (2015), 338–346.
55. Yang, J., Song, D., Wu, F., Regional variations of environmental co-benefits of wind power generation in China. Appl. Energy 14:2 (2017), 234–262.
56. Zhan, Y., Tan, K.H., Ji, G., Chung, L., Chiu, A.S., Green and lean sustainable development path in China: guanxi, practices and performance. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 128 (2018), 240–249.
57. Zhang, B., Poon, C.S., Use of furnace bottom ash for producing lightweight aggregate concrete with thermal insulation properties. J. Clean. Prod. 99 (2015), 94–100.