Introduction Searching for the categorization of spatial entities in language and cognition

Human Cognitive Processing

Volumn 20, Issue , 2007, Pages 1-32

  Aurnague, Michel ^a   Hickmann, Maya ^b   Vieu, Laure ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ TOULOUSE JEAN JAURÈS   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^d Laboratory of Applied Ontology   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048996000     PISSN: 13876724     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Editorial

References (65)

1. Asher, Nicholas & Pierre Sablayrolles (1996). A typology and discourse semantics for motion verbs and spatial PPs in French. In J. Pustejowsky & B. Boguraev (Eds.), Lexical semantics: The problem of polysemy (pp. 163–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Aurnague, Michel (1996). Les noms de localisation interne: Tentative de caractérisation sémantique à partir de données du basque et du français. Cahiers de Lexicologie, 69, 159–192.
3. Aurnague, Michel (2004). Les structures de l’espace linguistique: Regards croisés sur quelques constructions spatiales du basque et du français [Bibliothèque de l’Information Grammaticale 56]. Leuven & Paris: Peeters.
4. Aurnague, Michel, Laure Vieu, & Andrée Borillo (1997). Représentation formelle des concepts spatiaux dans la langue. In M. Denis (Ed.), Langage et cognition spatiale (pp. 69–102). Paris: Masson.
5. Berman, Ruth A. & Dan I. Slobin (Eds.). (1994). Different ways of relating events in narrative: A crosslinguistic developmental study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Borillo, Andrée (1988). Le lexique de l’espace: Les noms et les adjectifs de localisation interne. Cahiers de Grammaire, 13, 1–22.
7. Borillo, Andrée (1999). Partition et localisation spatiale: Les noms de localisation interne. Langages, 136, 53–76.
8. Bowerman, Melissa (1996a). The origins of children’s spatial semantic categories: Cognitive versus linguistic determinants. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 145–176). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Bowerman, Melissa (1996b). Learning how to structure space for language: A crosslinguistic perspective. In P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, & M. Garrett (Eds.), Language and space (pp. 385–436). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Bowerman, Melissa & Soonja Choi (2001). Shaping meanings for language: universal and language-specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In M. Bowerman & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development (pp. 475–511). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Bowerman, Melissa & Soonja Choi (2003). Space under construction: Language-specific categorization in first language acquistion. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 387–427). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
12. Brown, Penelope (1994). The INs and ONs of Tzeltal locative expressions: The semantics of static descriptions of location. Linguistics, 32, 743–790.
13. Carey, Susan & Elizabeth S. Spelke (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 169–200). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Casasola, Marianella (2005). Can language do the driving? The effect of linguistic input on infants’ categorization of support spatial relations. Developmental Psychology, 4, 183–192.
15. Casasola, Marianella & Leslie B. Cohen (2002). Infant categorization of containment, support and tight-fit relationships. Developmental Science, 5, 247–264.
16. Casati, Roberto & Achille Varzi (1999). Parts and places – The structures of spatial representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Chisholm, Roderick (1996). A realistic theory of categories: An essay in ontology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Choi, Soonja, Laraine McDonough, Melissa Bowerman, & Jean Mandler (1999). Early sensitivity to language-specific spatial categories in English and Korean. Child Development, 14, 241–268.
19. Comrie, Bernard (1976). Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Craig, Colette (Ed.). (1986). Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
21. Davidson, Donald (1980). Essays on action and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
22. Durand, Karine & Roger Lécuyer (2002). Object permanence observed in four month-old infants with a 2D display. Infant Behavior and Development, 25(3), 269–278.
23. Frege, Gottlob (1892). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50. Translated as “On sense and reference”. In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Gentner, Dedre (2003). Why we’re so smart. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 195–235). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
25. Gentner, Dedre & Susan Goldin-Meadow (Eds.). (2003). Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
26. Heine, Bernd (1997). Possession: Cognitive sources, forces and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, & Friederike Hünnemeyer (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Herskovits, Annette (1986). Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Hickmann, Maya (2003a). Children’s discourse: Person, space and time across languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Hickmann, Maya (2003b). Pensée verbale et pensée prélinguistique: Le problème de la relativité linguistique. In C. Vandeloise (Ed.), Langues et cognition (pp. 133–159). Paris: Hermès.
31. Hill, Deborah (1996). Distinguishing the notion “place” in an Oceanic language. In M. Pütz & R. Dirven (Eds.), The construal of space in language and thought (pp. 307–328). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
32. Jackendoff, Ray (1983). Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Jackendoff, Ray (1990). Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Kleiber, Georges (1997). Sens, référence et existence: Que faire de l’extra-linguistique? Langages, 127, 9–37.
35. Langacker, Ronald (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
36. Lécuyer, Roger, Arlette Streri, & Marie-Germaine Pêcheux (1996). Le développement cognitif du nourrisson. Paris: Nathan.
37. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1969). Towards a semantic description of English. London: Longman.
38. Leslie, Alan M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). New York: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lesniewski, Stanislaw (1927–1931). O podstawach matematyki [On the foundations of mathematics]. Przeglad Filosoficzny [Philosophical Review] 30–34. English translation in: Topoi, 2, 7–52.
40. Levinson, Stephen C. (1994). Vision, shape, and linguistic description: Tzeltal body-part terminology and object description. Linguistics, 32, 791–855.
41. Link, Godehard (1983). The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: A lattice theoretical approach. In R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. V. Stechow (Eds), Meaning, use and interpretation of language (pp. 302–323). Berlin: de Gruyter.
42. Link, Godehart (1997). Algebraic semantics in language and philosophy. CSLI, Lecture Notes.
43. Mandler, Jean M. (1988). How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system. Cognitive Development, 3, 113–136.
44. ◦ 4, 587–604.
45. Mandler, Jean M. (1998). Representation. In W. Damon, D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 2 (pp. 255–308). New York: Wiley.
46. Masolo, Claudio, Stefano Borgo, Aldo Gangemi, Nicola Guarino, & Alessandro Oltramari (2003). The WonderWeb Library of Foundational Ontologies and the DOLCE ontology. WonderWeb (EU IST Project 2001–33052) Deliverable D18.
47. Moens, Marc & Mark Steedman (1988). Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics, 14, 15–28.
48. Parsons, Terence (1970). An analysis of mass terms and amount terms. Foundations of language, 6, 363–388.
49. Parsons, Terence (1975). Afterthougths on mass terms. Synthese, 31, 517–521.
50. Pelletier, François (Ed.). (1979). Mass terms: Some philosophical problems. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
51. Quine, Willard V. (1960). Words and objects. New York & London: John Wiley & Sons.
52. Pustejovsky, James (1955). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
53. Russell, Bertrand (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14, 479–493.
54. Sider, Theodore (2003). Four-dimensionalim – An ontology of persistence and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
55. Slobin, Dan I. (1996). From ‘thought to language’ to ‘thinking for speaking’. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 70–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Slobin, Dan I. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
57. Slobin, Dan I. (2006). What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In M. Hickmann & S. Robert (Eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories (pp. 59–81). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
58. Smith, Barry (2004). Beyond concepts: Ontology as reality representation. In A. Varzi & L. Vieu (Eds.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Proceedings of the Third International Conference (pp. 73–84). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
59. Spelke, Elizabeth S. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought (pp. 277–311). Cambridge, MA & London: MIT Press.
60. ◦ 4, 605–632.
61. Stosic, Dejan (2002). Par et à travers dans l’expression des relations spatiales: Comparaison entre le français et le serbo-croate. Doctoral dissertation. Toulouse: Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.
62. Talmy, Leonard (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics (Vol. 1 & 2). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63. Vandeloise, Claude (1986). L’espace en français: sémantique des prépositions spatiales. Paris: Seuil. Vendler, Zeno (1957). Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66, 143–160.
64. Vet, Co (1994). Petite grammaire de l’Aktionsart et de l’aspect. Cahiers de Grammaire, 19, 1–18.
65. Winston, Morton, Roger Chaffin, & Douglas Herrmann (1987). A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science, 11, 417–444.