Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: Our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research

BMC Medicine

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Long, Katrina M ^a   McDermott, Fiona ^a   Meadows, Graham N ^a,b,c  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c SOUTHERN HEALTH   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complexity theory; Epistemology; Health services research; Implementation science; Methodology; Pragmatism

Indexed keywords

APPLIED RESEARCH; ARTICLE; EPISTEMOLOGY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LEARNING; SIMULATION; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC);

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PRAGMATIC CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85048976040     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1087-6     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Klein JH, Young T. Health care: a case of hypercomplexity? Health Systems. 2015;4(2):104-10.
2. Eldabi T. Implementation issues of modeling healthcare problems: misconceptions and lessons. Proceedings of the 2009 winter simulation conference (WSC). IEEE. 2009; https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2009.5429192.
3. Tako AA. Robinson S. Is simulation in health different? J Oper Res Soc. 2015;66(4):602-14.
4. Kernick D. Wanted - new methodologies for health service research. Is complexity theory the answer? Fam Pract. 2006;23(3):385-90.
5. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. Br Med J. 2001;323:625-8.
6. Plsek PE, Wilson T. Complexity, leadership, and management in healthcare organisations. Br Med J. 2001;323:746-9.
7. Sanderson I. Intelligent policy making for a complex world: pragmatism, evidence and learning. Political Studies. 2009;57(4):699-719.
8. Litaker D, Tomolo A, Liberatore V, Stange KC, Aron D. Using complexity theory to build interventions that improve health care delivery in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(S2):S30-4.
9. Plsek PE. Complexity and the adoption of innovation in health care. In: accelerating quality improvement in health care: strategies to accelerate the diffusion of evidence-based innovations. Washington, DC: National Institute for healthcare management foundation and National Committee for. Quality in Health Care. 2003;
10. Anderson RA, Crabtree BF, Steele DJ, McDaniel RR. Case study research: the view from complexity science. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(5):669-85.
11. Rockwell Automation. ARENA. In. In: 13.90 edn; 2010.
12. Mental Health Act 2014. Government of Victoria. No 26 of 2014. http://www8.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdb/au/legis/vic/num_act/mha201426o2014174/. Accessed 23 May 2018.
13. National Disability Insurance Scheme Act 2013. Parliament of Australia, No 20, 2013. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016C00894. Accessed 23 May 2018.
14. Cordery A. Innovative mental health program falling victim to funding freeze. The Sydney Morning Herald. 2015; https://www.smh.com.au/healthcare/innovative-mental-health-program-falling-victim-to-funding-freeze-20150423-1ms0wm.html. Accessed 22 May 2018
15. Victorian Healthcare Association. State budget submission 2015-16. Melbourne: VHA; 2015.
16. McDermott F. Complexity theory, trans-disciplinary working and reflective practice. In: Applying complexity theory. Pycroft a, Bartollas C. Bristol: policy press; 2014. p. 181-98.
17. Holland JH. Complexity: a very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
18. Byrne DS. Complexity theory and the social sciences: an introduction. New York, NY: Routledge; 1998.
19. Manson SM. Simplifying complexity: a review of complexity theory. Geoforum. 2001;32(3):405-14.
20. Byrne D, Callaghan G, Winter T. Complexity theory and the social sciences: the state of the art. Abingdon: Taylor and Francis; 2013.
21. McKelvey B. Complexity theory in organization science: seizing the promise or becoming a fad? Emergence. 1999;1(1):5-32.
22. Long KM, Meadows G. Simulation modelling in mental health: a systematic review. J Simulation. 2018;12(1):76-85.
23. Fone D, Hollinghurst S, Temple M, Round A, Lester N, Weightman A, Roberts K, Coyle E, Bevan G, Palmer S. Systematic review of the use and value of computer simulation modelling in population health and health care delivery. J Public Health Med. 2003;25(4):325-35.
24. Brailsford SC, Harper PR, Patel B, Pitt M. An analysis of the academic literature on simulation and modelling in health care. J Simulation. 2009;3(3):130-40.
25. Brailsford SC, Bolt TB, Bucci G, Chaussalet TM, Connell NA, Harper PR, Klein JH, Pitt M, Taylor M. Overcoming the barriers: a qualitative study of simulation adoption in the NHS. J Oper Res Soc. 2013;64(2):157-68.
26. Brailsford SC. Overcoming the barriers to implementation of operations research simulation models in healthcare. Clin Investig Med. 2005;28(6):312-5.
27. Robinson S, Pidd M. Provider and customer expectations of successful simulation projects. J Operat Res Soc. 1998;49(3):200-9.
28. van Lent WA, VanBerkel P, van Harten WH. A review on the relation between simulation and improvement in hospitals. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012;12:18.
29. Brailsford SC, Bolt T, Connell C, Klein JH, Patel B. Stakeholder engagement in health care simulation. Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2009.5429190.
30. Kirchhof P, Meseth N. A survey on the use of simulation in German healthcare. Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2012.6465026.
31. Tunnicliffe-Wilson JC. Implementation of computer simulation projects in health care. J Operat Res Soc. 1981;32(9):825-32.
32. Lane DC, Monefeldt C, Husemann E. Client involvement in simulation model building: hints and insights from a case study in a London hospital. Health Care Manage Sci. 2003;6:105-16.
33. Barnes CD, Benson C, Quiason JL, McGuiness D. Success Stories in Simulation in Health Care. Proceedings of the 29th Conference on Winter Simulation 1997. Atlanta, GA: IEEE Computer Society; 1997. p. 1280-1285.
34. Walton M. Applying complexity theory: a review to inform evaluation design. Eval Program Plann. 2014;45:119-26.
35. Haynes P. Complexity theory and evaluation in public management. Public Manage Rev. 2008;10(3):401-19.
36. Arndt M, Bigelow B. Commentary: the potential of chaos theory and complexity theory for health services management. Health Care Manag Rev. 2000;25(1):35-8.
37. Greenhalgh T, Plsek P, Wilson T, Fraser S, Holt T. Response to 'the appropriation of complexity theory in health care'. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(2):115-7.
38. Grayling AC, Baggini J, Fricker M. Pragmatism. In: In Our Time. Bragg M. BBC Radio 4; 2005. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p003k9f5. Accessed 22 May 2018.
39. Paley J. The appropriation of complexity theory in health care. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2010;15(1):59-61.
40. Goldstein J. Emergence as a construct: history and issues. Emergence. 1999;1(1):49-72.
41. Oxford English Dictionary: "pragmatic, adj. and n.": Oxford University Press.
42. Biesta G. Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In: SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd edn. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010. p. 95-118.
43. Talisse RB, Aikin SF. Pragmatism: a guide for the perplexed. London: Continuum. 2008;
44. Ruwhiu D, Cone M. Advancing a pragmatist epistemology in organisational research. Qualit Res Organ Manage. 2010;5(2):108-26.
45. Rylander A, Pragmatism and Design Research - An Overview. Designfakultetens kunskapssammanställningar. In: Stockholm; 2012. http://www.designfakulteten.kth.se/sites/default/files/designfpragdesignrapport_18.4.pdf.
46. Richardson K, Cilliers P. What is complexity science? A view from different directions. Emergence Complex Organ. 2001;3(1):5-23.
47. Dewey J. The public and its problems: an essay in political inquiry. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2012.
48. Morgan DL. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. J Mixed Methods Res. 2007;1(1):48-76.
49. Little A. Political action, error and failure: the epistemological limits of complexity. Political Studies. 2011;60(1):3-19.
50. Hathcoat JD, Meixner C. Pragmatism, factor analysis, and the conditional incompatibility thesis in mixed methods research. J Mixed Methods Res. 2015;11(4):433-49.
51. Greene JC, Hall JN. Dialetics and pragmatism: being of consequence. In: SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. 2nd edn. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications; 2010. p. 119-44.