Mixed Methods Papers in First-Person and Third-Person: Writing Voices in Dialogue

Journal of Mixed Methods Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 344-357

  Zhou, Xiaodi ^a   Hall, Jori N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Bakhtin; dialectic; first person; mixed methods writing; third person

Indexed keywords

EID: 85048851461     PISSN: 15586898     EISSN: 15586901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1558689816652755     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alfred G. J., Brusaw C. T., Oliu W. E., (2011). The business writer’s handbook. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.
2. Alvarez A., (2005). The writer’s voice. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
3. Bakhtin M. M., (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Emerson C., Holquist M., Eds.; Holquist M., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
4. Bakhtin M. M., (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (Holquist M., Emerson C., Eds.; McGee V. W., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. Bansal P., Corley K., (2012). Publishing in AMJ—Part 7: What’s different about qualitative research? Academy of Management Journal, 55, 509-513.
6. Boyatzis R. E., (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Brenner R.B., (2014). The faith and doubt of Holocaust survivors. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
8. Burke K., (2005). Aesthetic pursuits: Windows, frames, words, images: Part I. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32, 133-142.
9. Collins K., Onwuegbuzie A., Sutton I., (2006). A model incorporating the rationale and purpose for conducting mixed methods research in special education and beyond. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 4, 67-100.
10. Deleuze G., Guttari F., (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (Massumi B., Trans.). Paris, France: Les Editions de Minuit.
11. Denscombe M., (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283.
12. Egi T., (2010). Uptake, modified output, and learner perceptions of recasts: Learner responses as language awareness. Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 1-21.
13. Elmore R., (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
14. Finlay L., (2009). Writing the pain: Engaging first-person phenomenological accounts. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 12(Special Edition), 1-9.
15. Foucault M., (2010). The government of the self and others: Lectures at the collège de France 1982-1983 (Gros F., Ed.; Bushell G., Trans.). New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
16. Freshwater D., (2007). Reading mixed methods research: Contexts for criticism. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 134-146.
17. Gaertner-Johnson L., (2012). Do first and third person mix well? Business Writing, 8. Retrieved from http://www.businesswritingblog.com/business_writing/2012/08/do-first-and-third-person-mix-well.html
18. Greene J. C., (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Greene J. C., Caracelli V. J., Graham W. F., (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-274.
20. Greene J. C., Hall J. N., (2010). Dialectics and pragmatism: Being of consequence. In Tashakkori A., Teddle C., (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 119-144). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Haggas C., (2013). Writing is my drink: A writer’s story of finding her voice (and a guide to how you can too). Booklist, 110(4), 11.
22. Hall J. N., Ryan K., (2011). Educational accountability: A qualitatively-driven mixed methods approach. Qualitative Inquiry, 17, 105-115.
23. Hermans H. J. M., (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture Psychology, 7, 243-281.
24. Hermans H. J. M., Hermans-Konopka A., (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
25. Hermans H. J. M., Kempen H. J. G., van Loons R. J. P., (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23-33.
26. Johnson R. B., Onwuegbuzie A. J., (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
27. Johnson R. B., Onwuegbuzie A. J., Turner L., (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.
28. Jwa S., (2012). Modeling L2 writer voice: Discoursal positioning in fanfiction writing. Computers and Composition, 29, 323-340.
29. Kamler B., (2001). Relocating the personal: A critical writing pedagogy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
30. Morgan M. L., (2007). Paradigms lost and paradigms regained: Methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76.
31. Nardi P., (2006). Doing survey research: A guide to quantitative methods. London, England: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon.
32. Nestor T. P., (2013). Writing is my drink: A writer’s story of finding her voice (and a guide to how you can too). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
33. Newkirk T., Miller L. C., (2009). The essential Don Murray: Lessons from America’s greatest writing teacher. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
34. Newmann F. M., King M. B., Rigdon M., (1997). Accountability and school performance: Implications from restructuring schools. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 41-74.
35. Niglas K., (2009). How the novice researcher can make sense of mixed methods research designs. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 3, 34-46.
36. Onwuegbuzie A. J., Johnson R. B., (2006). The validity issues in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
37. Onwuegbuzie A. J., Leech N., (2006). Linking research questions to mixed methods data analysis procedures. Qualitative Report, 11, 474-498.
38. Poulos C. N., (2012). Writing through memories: Autoethnography as a path to transcendence. International Review of Qualitative Research, 5, 315-326.
39. Prasad P., (2005). Crafting qualitative research: Working in the postposivitist traditions. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
40. Prince R., Archer A., (2014). Exploring voice in multimodal quantitative texts. Literacy & Numeracy Studies, 22(1), 39-57.
41. Reissenweber B., (2012). Third-person limited offers flexibility. Writer, 125(7), 11.
42. Rosenblatt L. M., (1986). The aesthetic transaction. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 20(4), 122-128.
43. Rosenblatt L. M., (1994). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of literary work. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
44. Sandelowski M., (2003). Tables or tableaux: The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In Tashakkori A., Teddlie C., (eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Sandelowski M., Voils C. I., Knafl G., (2009). On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(3), 208-222.
46. Schaafsma D., Vinz R., (2011). Narrative inquiry: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press.
47. Soydan S., (2013). General view on prepositions from the words available from the works written in hybrid language. Electronic Turkish Studies, 8, 2243-2268.
48. Teddlie C., Tashakkori A., (2010). Overview of contemporary issues in mixed methods research. In Tashakkori A., Teddlie C., (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed., pp. 1-41). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Viete R., Ha P. L., (2007). The growth of voice: Expanding possibilities of representing self in academic writing. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 39-57.
50. Wendelberger H., (2014). Hide and seek: Quantitative authorship identification in psychic language concealment. Southern Journal of Linguistics, 35(2), 25-46.
51. Wetcher-Hendrix D., (2014). Analyzing quantitative data: An introduction for social researchers. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.