Efficient Evaluation of Coding Strategies for Transcutaneous Language Communication

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 10894 LNCS, Issue , 2018, Pages 600-611

  Turcott, Robert ^a   Chen, Jennifer ^a   Castillo, Pablo ^a   Knott, Brian ^a   Setiawan, Wahyudinata ^a   Briggs, Forrest ^a   Klumb, Keith ^a   Abnousi, Freddy ^a   Chakka, Prasad ^a   Lau, Frances ^a   Israr, Ali ^a  

^a FACEBOOK   (United States)

Author keywords

Frequency Decomposition; Haptic communication; Learning; Phoneme; Speech to touch; Vibrotactile display; Vocoder

Indexed keywords

DISPLAY DEVICES; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; VOCODERS; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

FREQUENCY DECOMPOSITION; HAPTIC COMMUNICATIONS; LEARNING; PHONEME; VIBROTACTILE DISPLAYS;

SPEECH COMMUNICATION;

EID: 85048677753     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93399-3_51     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Reed, C.M., Rabinowitz, W.M., Durlach, N.I., Braida, L.D., Conway-Fithian, S., Schultz, M.C.: Research on the Tadoma method of speech communication. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77, 247–257 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.392266
2. Brooks, P.L., Frost, B.J., Mason, J.L., Gibson, D.M.: Continuing evaluation of the Queen’s University tactile vocoder II: identification of open set sentences and tracking narrative. J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 23, 129–138 (1986)
3. Israr, A., Meckl, P.H., Reed, C.M., Tan, H.Z.: Controller design and consonantal contrast coding using a multi-finger tactual display. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 3925–3935 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3124771
4. Galvin, K.L., Mavrias, G., Moore, A., Cowan, R.S.C., Blamey, P.J., Clark, G.M.: A comparison of Tactaid II+ and Tactaid 7 use by adults with a profound hearing impairment. Ear Hear. 20, 471–482 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199912000-00003
5. Oller, D.K.: Tactile AIDS for the hearing impaired: an overview. Semin. Hear. 16, 289–295 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1083726
6. Miyamoto, R.T., Robbins, A.M., Osberger, M.J., Todd, S.L., Riley, A.I., Kirk, K.I.: Comparison of multichannel tactile AIDS and multichannel cochlear implants in children with profound hearing impairments. Am. J. Otol. 16, 8–13 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-5876(95)97416-6
7. Brooks, P.L., Frost, B.J.: Evaluation of a tactile vocoder for word recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74, 34–39 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.389685
8. Muda, L., Begam, M., Elamvazuthi, I.: Voice recognition algorithms using mel frequency cepstral coefficient (MFCC) and dynamic time warping (DTW). Techniques 2, 138–143 (2010). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijigsp.2016.09.03
9. Hinton, G.E., Salakhutdinov, R.R.: Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science 313, 504–507 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127647
10. Zhao, S., Israr, A., Lau, F., Abnousi, F.: Coding tactile symbols for phonemic communication. In: Proceedings of CHI 2018 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173966
11. Israr, A., Poupyrev, I.: Tactile brush: drawing on skin with a tactile grid display. In: Proceedings of CHI 2011, pp. 2019–2028 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979235
12. Pesarin, F., Salmaso, L.: The permutation testing approach: a review. Statistica 70, 481–509 (2010). https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3599
13. Lim, S.J., Holt, L.L.: Learning foreign sounds in an alien world: videogame training improves non-native speech categorization. Cogn. Sci. 35, 1390–1405 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01192.x
14. Przybylski, A.K., Rigby, C.S., Ryan, R.M.: A motivational model of video game engagement. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 14, 154–166 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019440
15. Hewlett, D., Cohen, P.: Word segmentation as general chunking. In: Proceedings of Fifteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 39–47 (2011)
16. MacMillan, N.A.: Signal detection theory. In: Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology (2002)