Magnetic field remotely controlled selective biocatalysis

Nature Catalysis

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 73-81

  Zakharchenko, Andrey ^a   Guz, Nataliia ^b   Laradji, Amine Mohamed ^a   Katz, Evgeny ^b   Minko, Sergiy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; ENZYMES; MAGNETIC FIELDS; NANOMAGNETICS; NANOPARTICLES; TARGETED DRUG DELIVERY;

BIOCATALYTIC REACTION; CONTROLLED RELEASE; CORE-SHELL MAGNETIC NANOPARTICLES; ENZYME-SUBSTRATE INTERACTIONS; EXTERNAL MAGNETIC FIELD; PROOF OF CONCEPT; THERAPEUTIC DRUGS; WEAK MAGNETIC FIELDS;

CONTROLLED DRUG DELIVERY;

EID: 85048553411     PISSN: None     EISSN: 25201158     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-017-0003-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Torchilin, V. P. Multifunctional, stimuli-sensitive nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 13, 813-827 (2014).
2. Kudina, O. et al. Highly efficient phase boundary biocatalysis with enzymogel nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 483-487 (2014).
3. Popat, A. et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for bioadsorption, enzyme immobilisation, and delivery carriers. Nanoscale 3, 2801-2818 (2011).
4. Katz, E. & Willner, I. Integrated nanoparticle-biomolecule hybrid systems: synthesis, properties, and applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 6042-6108 (2004).
5. Tokarev, A., Yatvin, J., Trotsenko, O., Locklin, J. & Minko, S. Nanostructured soft matter with magnetic nanoparticles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 26, 3761-3782 (2016).
6. Hu, J. M., Zhang, G. Q. & Liu, S. Y. Enzyme-responsive polymeric assemblies, nanoparticles and hydrogels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 5933-5949 (2012).
7. de la Rica, R., Aili, D. & Stevens, M. M. Enzyme-responsive nanoparticles for drug release and diagnostics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 64, 967-978 (2012).
8. Stuart, M. A. C. et al. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials. Nat. Mater. 9, 101-113 (2010).
9. Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J. & Couvreur, P. Magnetic nanoparticles: design and characterization, toxicity and biocompatibility, pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Chem. Rev. 112, 5818-5878 (2012).
10. Mura, S., Nicolas, J. & Couvreur, P. Stimuli-responsive nanocarriers for drug delivery. Nat. Mater. 12, 991-1003 (2013).
11. Katz, E., Lioubashevski, O. & Willner, I. Magnetic field effects on cytochrome c-mediated bioelectrocatalytic transformations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 11088-11092 (2004).
12. Katz, E., Weizmann, Y. & Willner, I. Magnetoswitchable reactions of DNA monolayers on electrodes: gating the processes by hydrophobic magnetic nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9191-9200 (2005).
13. Katz, E. & Willner, I. Switching of directions of bioelectrocatalytic currents and photocurrents at electrode surfaces by using hydrophobic magnetic nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 4791-4794 (2005).
14. Tam, T. K., Ornatska, M., Pita, M., Minko, S. & Katz, E. Polymer brushmodified electrode with switchable and tunable redox activity for bioelectronic applications. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 8438-8445 (2008).
15. Weizmann, Y., Elnathan, R., Lioubashevski, O. & Willner, I. Endonucleasebased logic gates and sensors using magnetic force-amplified readout of DNA scission on cantilevers. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 12666-12672 (2005).
16. Hayashi, K. et al. Magnetically responsive smart nanoparticles for cancer treatment with a combination of magnetic hyperthermia and remote-control drug release. Theranostics 4, 834-844 (2014).
17. Uline, M. J., Rabin, Y. & Szleifer, I. Effects of the salt concentration on charge regulation in tethered polyacid monolayers. Langmuir 27, 4679-4689 (2011).
18. Halsey, T. C. & Toor, W. Fluctuation-induced couplings between defect lines or particle chains. J. Stat. Phys. 61, 1257-1281 (1990).
19. Furst, E. M. & Gast, A. P. Particle dynamics in magnetorheological suspensions using diffusing wave spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. E 58, 3372-3376 (1998).
20. Gulley, G. L. & Tao, R. Structures of an electrorheological fluid. Phys. Rev. E 56, 4328-4336 (1997).
21. Tan, Z. J., Zou, X. W., Zhang, W. B. & Jin, Z. Z. Structure transition in cluster-cluster aggregation under external fields. Phys. Rev. E 62, 734-737 (2000).
22. Silva, A. S., Bond, R., Plouraboue, F. & Wirtz, D. Fluctuation dynamics of a single magnetic chain. Phys. Rev. E 54, 5502-5510 (1996).
23. Cheng, R., Zhu, L., Huang, W. J., Mao, L. D. & Zhao, Y. P. Dynamic scaling of ferromagnetic micro-rod clusters under a weak magnetic field. Soft Matter 12, 8440-8447 (2016).
24. Townsend, J., Burtovyy, R., Galabura, Y. & Luzinov, I. Flexible chains of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 8, 6970-6978 (2014).
25. Motornov, M. et al. Field-directed self-assembly with locking nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 12, 3814-3820 (2012).
26. Wilhelm, S. et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16014 (2016).
27. Sawant, R. M. et al. Nanosized cancer cell-targeted polymeric immunomicelles loaded with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1777-1785 (2009).
28. Liao, C. D., Sun, Q. Q., Liang, B. L., Shen, J. & Shuai, X. T. Targeting EGFR-overexpressing tumor cells using cetuximab-immunomicelles loaded with doxorubicin and superparamagnetic iron oxide. Euro. J. Radiol. 80, 699-705 (2011).
29. Zhu, L. et al. Targeted delivery of methotrexate to skeletal muscular tissue by thermosensitive magnetoliposomes. Int. J. Pharm. 370, 136-143 (2009).
30. Yang, L. L. et al. Receptor-targeted nanoparticles for in vivo imaging of breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 15, 4722-4732 (2009).
31. Liu, D. F. et al. Conjugation of paclitaxel to iron oxide nanoparticles for tumor imaging and therapy. Nanoscale 4, 2306-2310 (2012).
32. Bagalkot, V. et al. Quantum dot: aptamer conjugates for synchronous cancer imaging, therapy, and sensing of drug delivery based on bi-fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Nano Lett. 7, 3065-3070 (2007).
33. Karlsson, H. L., Gustafsson, J., Cronholm, P. & Moller, L. Size-dependent toxicity of metal oxide particles: a comparison between nano-and micrometer size. Toxicol. Lett. 188, 112-118 (2009).
34. Villanueva, A. et al. The influence of surface functionalization on the enhanced internalization of magnetic nanoparticles in cancer cells. Nanotechnology 20, doi:10.1088/0957-4484/20/11/115103 (2009).
35. Bumb, A. et al. Synthesis and characterization of ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles thinly coated with silica. Nanotechnology 19, 335601 (2008).
36. Deng, Y. H., Wang, C. C., Hu, J. H., Yang, W. L. & Fu, S. K. Investigation of formation of silica-coated magnetite nanoparticles via sol-gel approach. Colloids Surf. A 262, 87-93 (2005).
37. Jakubowski, W. & Matyjaszewski, K. Activator generated by electron transfer for atom transfer radical polymerization. Macromolecules 38, 4139-4146 (2005).
38. Miyajima, T., Mori, M., Ishiguro, S., Chung, K. H. & Moon, C. H. On the complexation of Cd(II) ions with polyacrylic acid. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 184, 279-288 (1996).
39. Schiller, A. A., Schayer, R. W. & Hess, E. L. Fluorescein-conjugated bovine albumin. Physical and biological properties. J. Gen. Physiol. 36, 489-505 (1953).
40. Leermakers, F. A. M., Ballauff, M. & Borisov, O. V. On the mechanism of uptake of globular proteins by polyelectrolyte brushes: a two-gradient self-consistent field analysis. Langmuir 23, 3937-3946 (2007).