메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2018, Pages 335-340

Harnessing the synergy between improvement science and implementation science in cancer: A call to action

(10)  Koczwara, Bogda a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Stover, Angela M a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Davies, Louise a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Davis, Melinda M a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Fleisher, Linda a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Ramanadhan, Shoba a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Schroeck, Florian R a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Zullig, Leah L a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Chambers, David A a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l   Proctor, Enola a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l  


Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CURRICULUM; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALIGNANT NEOPLASM; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; ONCOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

EID: 85048456865     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.17.00083     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (57)

References (20)
  • 1
    • 84892370974 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste
    • Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, et al.: Biomedical research: Increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 383:101-104, 2014
    • (2014) Lancet , vol.383 , pp. 101-104
    • MacLeod, M.R.1    Michie, S.2    Roberts, I.3
  • 3
    • 85029752894 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cancer patients need better care, not just more technology
    • Sullivan R, Pramesh CS, Booth CM: Cancer patients need better care, not just more technology. Nature 549:325-328, 2017
    • (2017) Nature , vol.549 , pp. 325-328
    • Sullivan, R.1    Pramesh, C.S.2    Booth, C.M.3
  • 4
    • 84922607818 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Demystifying theory and its use in improvement
    • Davidoff F, Dixon-Woods M, Leviton L, et al.: Demystifying theory and its use in improvement. BMJ Qual Saf 24:228-238, 2015
    • (2015) BMJ Qual Saf , vol.24 , pp. 228-238
    • Davidoff, F.1    Dixon-Woods, M.2    Leviton, L.3
  • 5
    • 84958176353 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimizing cancer care delivery through implementation science
    • Adesoye T, Greenberg CC, Neuman HB: Optimizing cancer care delivery through implementation science. Front Oncol 6:1, 2016
    • (2016) Front Oncol , vol.6 , pp. 1
    • Adesoye, T.1    Greenberg, C.C.2    Neuman, H.B.3
  • 6
    • 79956149639 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, research agenda
    • Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al.: Outcomes for implementation research: Conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health 38:65-76, 2011
    • (2011) Adm Policy Ment Health , vol.38 , pp. 65-76
    • Proctor, E.1    Silmere, H.2    Raghavan, R.3
  • 7
    • 84865674801 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research
    • Tabak RG, Khoong EC, Chambers DA, et al.: Bridging research and practice: Models for dissemination and implementation research. Am J Prev Med 43:337-350, 2012
    • (2012) Am J Prev Med , vol.43 , pp. 337-350
    • Tabak, R.G.1    Khoong, E.C.2    Chambers, D.A.3
  • 8
    • 85002273559 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
    • Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, et al.: SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf 25:986-992, 2015
    • (2015) BMJ Qual Saf , vol.25 , pp. 986-992
    • Ogrinc, G.1    Davies, L.2    Goodman, D.3
  • 9
    • 85014718182 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Standards for reporting implementation studies (StaRI) statement
    • Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al.: Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ 356:i6795, 2017
    • (2017) BMJ , vol.356 , pp. 16795
    • Pinnock, H.1    Barwick, M.2    Carpenter, C.R.3
  • 10
    • 85027437072 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Leveraging implementation science to improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes
    • Mitchell SA, Chambers DA: Leveraging implementation science to improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes. J Oncol Pract 13:523-529, 2017
    • (2017) J Oncol Pract , vol.13 , pp. 523-529
    • Mitchell, S.A.1    Chambers, D.A.2
  • 11
    • 0032616201 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine
    • Plsek PE: Quality improvement methods in clinical medicine. Pediatrics 103: 203-214, 1999 (suppl)
    • (1999) Pediatrics , vol.103 , pp. 203-214
    • Plsek, P.E.1
  • 15
    • 85048385863 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Open School
    • Institute for Healthcare Improvement: Open School. http://www.ihi.org/education/ihiopenschool/Pages/default.aspx
  • 17
    • 85048446047 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: EvidenceNOW Tools and Materials. https://www.ahrq.gov/evidencenow/tools-and-materials
    • EvidenceNOW Tools and Materials
  • 19
    • 84862768567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Summer Institute
    • Knowledge Translation Canada: Summer Institute. https://ktcanada.org/education/summer-institute
    • Knowledge Translation Canada
  • 20
    • 84891950581 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An instrument to differentiate between clinical research and quality improvement
    • Ogrinc G, Nelson WA, Adams SM, et al.: An instrument to differentiate between clinical research and quality improvement. IRB 35:1-8, 2013
    • (2013) IRB , vol.35 , pp. 1-8
    • Ogrinc, G.1    Nelson, W.A.2    Adams, S.M.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.