The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline

Cancer

Volumn 124, Issue 14, 2018, Pages 2964-2973

  Peterse, Elisabeth F P ^a   Meester, Reinier G S ^a,b   Siegel, Rebecca L ^c   Chen, Jennifer C ^d   Dwyer, Andrea ^e,f   Ahnen, Dennis J ^e   Smith, Robert A ^c   Zauber, Ann G ^d   Lansdorp Vogelaar, Iris ^a  

^a ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY   (United States)

^d MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^f Fight Colorectal Cancer (Fight CRC)   (United States)

Author keywords

advisory committees; colorectal neoplasms; early detection of cancer; incidence; models; preventive health services; theoretical

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INCIDENCE; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMMUNOCHEMISTRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NON PROFIT ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; SIMULATION; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEE; AGE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CANCER REGISTRY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OCCULT BLOOD; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEER PROGRAM; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85047747061     PISSN: 0008543X     EISSN: 10970142     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31543     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer statistics center. https://cancerstatisticscenter.cancer.org/?_ga=1.33682849.1877282425.1465291457#/cancer-site/Colorectum. Accessed April 30, 2018
2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:177-193
3. Holme O, Bretthauer M, Fretheim A, Odgaard-Jensen J, Hoff G. Flexible sigmoidoscopy versus faecal occult blood testing for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic individuals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(9):CD009259
4. Bibbins-Domingo K, Grossman DC, Curry SJ, et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2016;315:2564-2575
5. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al; American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Advisory Group; US Multi-Society Task Force; American College of Radiology Colon Cancer Committee. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130-160
6. Siegel RL, Fedewa SA, Anderson WF, et al. Colorectal cancer incidence patterns in the United States, 1974-2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109(8)
7. Austin H, Henley SJ, King J, Richardson LC, Eheman C. Changes in colorectal cancer incidence rates in young and older adults in the United States: what does it tell us about screening. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25:191-201
8. O'Connell JB, Maggard MA, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Livingston EH, Ko CY. Rates of colon and rectal cancers are increasing in young adults. Am Surg. 2003;69:866-872
9. Bailey CE, Hu CY, You YN, et al. Increasing disparities in the age-related incidences of colon and rectal cancers in the United States, 1975-2010. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:17-22
10. Siegel RL, Jemal A, Ward EM. Increase in incidence of colorectal cancer among young men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1695-1698
11. Singh KE, Taylor TH, Pan CG, Stamos MJ, Zell JA. Colorectal cancer incidence among young adults in California. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2014;3:176-184
12. North American Association of Central Cancer Registries. NAACCR Incidence Data-CiNA Analytic File, 1995-2014, Public Use (which includes data from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR), CCCR's Provincial and Territorial Registries, and the NCI's Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Registries), certified by the NAACCR as meeting high-quality incidence data standards for the specified time periods, submitted December 2016
13. National Center for Health Statistics. US Vital Statistics System. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2016
14. Knudsen AB, Zauber AG, Rutter CM, et al. Estimation of benefits, burden, and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: modeling study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315:2595-2609
15. van Hees F, Habbema JD, Meester RG, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG. Should colorectal cancer screening be considered in elderly persons without previous screening? A cost-effectiveness analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160:750-759
16. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, Habbema JD, Kuipers EJ. Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1412-1422
17. Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Mariotto AB, et al. Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:849-857, W152
18. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:230-236
19. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER*Stat Software, version 8.3.4. Surveillance Research Program. http://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/. Accessed August 24, 2017
20. Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Levin TR. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844-857
21. Mark DH. Visualizing cost-effectiveness analysis. JAMA. 2002;287:2428-2429
22. Sanders GD, Neumann PJ, Basu A, et al. Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA. 2016;316:1093-1103
23. Atreja A, Bellam N, Levy SR. Strategies to enhance patient adherence: making it simple. MedGenMed. 2005;7:4
24. Murphy CC, Lund JL, Sandler RS. Young-onset colorectal cancer: earlier diagnoses or increasing disease burden? Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1809-1812.e3
25. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Colorectal cancer mortality rates in adults aged 20 to 54 years in the United States, 1970-2014. JAMA. 2017;318:572-574
26. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 National Health Interview Survey. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis.htm. Accessed September 27 2017
27. Colquhoun P, Chen HC, Kim JI, et al. High compliance rates observed for follow up colonoscopy post polypectomy are achievable outside of clinical trials: efficacy of polypectomy is not reduced by low compliance for follow up. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6:158-161
28. Shaukat A, Mongin SJ, Geisser MS, et al. Long-term mortality after screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1106-1114
29. Meester RGS, Peterse EFP, Knudsen AB, et al. optimizing colorectal cancer screening by race and sex: microsimulation analysis II to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline. Cancer. 2018;124:2974-2985