The role of participation and control in the effects of computer monitoring on fairness perceptions, task satisfaction, and performance

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 867-874

  Douthitt, Elizabeth A ^a   Aiello, John R ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; PERCEPTION; PRIVACY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; JOB SATISFACTION; MALE; MICROCOMPUTERS; PERCEPTION; PRIVACY; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 85047684352     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.867     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aiello, J. R., & Kolb. K. J. (1995). Electronic performance monitoring and social context: Impact on productivity and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, 339-353.
2. Aiello, J. R., & Shao, Y. (1993). Electronic performance monitoring and stress: The role of feedback and goal setting. In M. J. Smith & G. Salvendy (Eds.), Human computer interaction: Applications and case studies (pp. 1011-1016). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
3. Aiello, J. R., & Svec, C. M. (1993). Computer monitoring of work oerformance: Extending the social facilitation framework to electronic aresence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 537-548.
4. Aribrose, M. L., & Alder, G. S. (2000). Designing, implementing, and utilizing computerized performance monitoring: Enhancing organizational justice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 187-219.
5. American Management Association. (1999). Workplace monitoring and surveillance: A 1999 AMA survey. Retrieved July 1, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.amanet.org/research/monit/index.htm
6. Berkowitz, L., & Donnerstein, E. (1982). External validity is more than skin deep: Some answers to criticisms of laboratory experiments. American Psychologist, 37, 245-257.
7. Bond, C. F., & Titus, L. J. (1983). Social facilitation: A meta-analysis of 241 studies. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 265-292.
8. Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., Jr., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In S. E. Seashore, E. E. Lawler III, P. H. Mirvis, & C. Cammann (Eds.), Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices (pp. 71-138). New York: Wiley.
9. Cawley, B. D., Keeping, L. M., & Levy, P. E. (1998). Participation in the performance appraisal process and employee reaction: A meta-analytic review of field investigations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 615-633.
10. Chalykoff, J., & Kochan, T. A. (1989). Computer-aided monitoring: Its influence on employee job satisfaction and turnover. Personnel Psychology, 42, 807-834.
11. DeTienne, K. B., & Abbott, N. T. (1993). Developing an employee-centered electronic monitoring system. Journal of Systems Management, 44(8), 12.
12. Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. A. (1989). Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115-130.
13. Greenberg, J. (1986a). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340-342.
14. Greenberg, J. (1986b). Organizational performance appraisal procedures: What makes them fair? Research on Negotiation in Organizations, 1, 25-41.
15. Greenberger, D. B., Strasser, S., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). The impact of personal control on performance and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 29-51.
16. Greenlaw, P. S., & Prundeanu, C. (1997). The impact of federal legislation to limit electronic monitoring. Public Personnel Management, 26, 227.
17. Griffith, T. L. (1993). Monitoring and performance: A comparison of computer and supervisor monitoring. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 549-572.
18. Guerin, B. (1986). The effects of mere presence on a motor task. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 399-401.
19. Guerin, B. (1993). Social facilitation. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
20. Irving, R. H., Higgins, C. A., & Safayeni, F. R. (1986). Computerized performance monitoring systems: Use and abuse. Communications of the ACM, 29, 794-801.
21. Kanfer, R., Sawyer, J., Barley, P. C., & Lind, E. A. (1987). Fairness and participation in evaluation procedures: Effects on task attitudes and performance. Social Justice Research, 1, 235-249.
22. Kidwell, R. E., Jr., & Bennett, N. (1994). Electronic surveillance as employee control: A procedural justice interpretation. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 5, 39-57.
23. Korsgaard, M. A., Schweiger, D. M., & Sapienza, H. J. (1995). Building commitment, attachment, and trust in strategic decision-making teams: The role of procedural justice. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 60-84.
24. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.). Social exchange: Advances in Theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum Press.
25. Lind, E. A., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. C. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
26. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
27. Martin, C., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group and Organization Management, 21, 84-104.
28. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626-637.
29. McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1996). Does having a say matter only if you get your way? Instrumental and value-expressive effects of employee voice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18, 289-303.
30. Miller, K. I., & Monge, P. R. (1986). Participation, satisfaction, and productivity: A meta-analytic review. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 727-753.
31. Mishra, J. M., & Crampton, S. M. (1998). Employee monitoring: Privacy in the workplace? SAM Advanced Management Journal, 63, 4.
32. Mook, D. G. (1983). In defense of external validity. American Psychologist, 38, 379-387.
33. Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 527-556.
34. Pedhazur, E. J. (1997). Multiple regression in behavioral research. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
35. Picard, M. (1994). Working under an electronic thumb. Training, 31(2), 47.
36. Reynolds, L. (1993, September). Congress may look at new regulations for monitoring. HR Focus, 70, 1-2.
37. Stanton, J. M., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (1996). Effects of electronic performance monitoring on personal control, task satisfaction, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 738-745.
38. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
39. Tyler, T. R., Rasinski, K., & Spodick, N. (1985). The influence of voice on satisfaction with leaders: Exploring the meaning of process control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 72-81.
40. Van den Bos, K., Vermunt, R., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1996). The consistency rule and the voice effect: The influence of expectations on procedural fairness judgements and performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 411-428.
41. Wagner, J. A., III. (1994). Participation's effects on performance and satisfaction: A reconsideration of research evidence. Academy of Management Review, 19, 312-330.
42. Zajonc, R. B. (1965, June 1). Social facilitation. Science, 149, 269-274.