Cued shifts of attention and memory encoding in partial report: A dual-task approach

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 695-725

  Giesbrecht, Barry ^a,b   Dixon, Peter ^a   Kingstone, Alan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 85047683488     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755989     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Averbach, E., & Coriell, A.S. (1961). Short-term memory in vision. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 40, 309-328.
2. Awh, E., & Jonides, J. (1998). Spatial working memory and spatial selective attention. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain (pp. 353-380). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Awh, E., Jonides, J., & Reuter-Lorenz, P.A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 780-790.
4. Chun, M.M., & Potter, M.C. (1995). A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 109-127.
5. Cohen, J. (1994). The Earth is round (p < .05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
6. Coltheart, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 183-228.
7. De Jong, R. (1993). Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 965-980.
8. Dixon, P. (1998). Why scientists value p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 390-396.
9. Dixon, P., & Di Lollo, V. (1991). Effects of display luminance, stimulus meaningfulness, and probe duration on visible and schematic persistence. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 54-74.
10. Dixon, P., Gordon, R.D., Leung, A., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Attentional components of partial report. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1253-1271.
11. Dixon, P., & O'Reilly, T. (1999). Scientific versus statistical inference. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 133-149.
12. Giesbrecht, B., & Di Lollo, V. (1998). Beyond the attentional blink: Visual masking by object substitution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1454-1466.
13. Giesbrecht, B., & Dixon, P. (1999). Isolating the interference caused by cue duration in partial report: A quantitative approach. Memory & Cognition, 27, 220-233.
14. Goodman, S.N., & Royall, R. (1988). Evidence and scientific research. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 1568-1574.
15. Hillyard, S.A., Vogel, E.K., & Luck, S.J. (1998). Sensory gain control (amplification) as a mechanism of selective attention: Electrophysiological and neuroimaging evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 353, 1257-1270.
16. Irwin, D.E., & Yeomans, J.M. (1986). Sensory registration an informational persistence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 343-360.
17. Ivry, R.B., Franz, E.A., Kingstone, A., & Johnston, J.C. (1998). The psychological refractory period effect following callosotomy: Uncoupling of lateralized response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 463-480.
18. Johnston, J.C., McCann, R.S., & Remington, R.W. (1995). Chronometric dissociation of two types of attention. Psychological Science, 6, 365-369.
19. Jolicoeur, P. (1998). Modulation of the attentional blink by on-line response selection: Evidence from speeded and unspeeded Task 1 decisions. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1014-1032.
20. Jolicoeur, P. (1999a). Dual-task interference and visual encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 596-616.
21. Jolicoeur, P. (1999b). Restricted attentional capacity between sensory modalities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 87-92.
22. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1998). The demonstration of short-term consolidation. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 138-202.
23. Jolicoeur, P., & Dell'Acqua, R. (1999). Attentional and structural constraints on visual encoding. Psychological Research, 62, 154-164.
24. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye movement. In J.B. Long & A.D. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Loftus, G.R. (1993). A picture is worth a thousand p values: On the irrelevance of hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 250-256.
26. Loftus, G.R., & Masson, M.E.J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subjects designs. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 476-490.
27. Mangun, G.R., & Hillyard, S.A. (1991). Modulation of sensory-evoked brain potentials provide evidence for changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074.
28. McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J.C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471-484.
29. Mewhort, D.J.K., Campbell, A.J., Marchetti, P.M., & Campbell, J.I.D. (1981). Identification, localization, and "iconic memory": An evaluation of the bar-probe task. Memory & Cognition, 9, 50-67.
30. Moran, J., & Desimone, R. (1985). Selective attention gates visual processing in extrastriate cortex. Science, 229, 782-783.
31. Müller, H.J., & Rabbitt, P.M.A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 315-330.
32. Pashler, H. (1984). Evidence against late selection: Stimulus quality effects in previewed displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 429-448.
33. Pashler, H. (1989). Dissociations and dependencies between speed and accuracy: Evidence for a two-component theory of divided attention in simple tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 469-514.
34. Pashler, H. (1991). Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: Distinct attentional mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1023-1040.
35. Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220-244.
36. Pashler, H. (1998). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Pashler, H., & Johnston, J.C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
38. Posner, M.I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3-25.
39. Prinzmetal, W. (1992). The word superiority effect does not require a T-scope. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 473-484.
40. Prinzmetal, W., Presti, D.E., & Posner, M.I. (1986). Does attention affect visual feature integration? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 361-369.
41. Rogers, R.D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
42. Ross, N.E., & Jolicoeur, P. (1999). Attentional blink for color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1483-1494.
43. Shapiro, K.L., Raymond, J.E., & Arnell, K.M. (1994). Attention to visual pattern information precedes the attentional blink in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 357-371.
44. Smith, E.E., Jonides, J., Koeppe, R.A., Awh, E., Schumacher, E.H., & Minoshima, S. (1995). Spatial versus object working memory: PET investigations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 337-356.
45. Sperling, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 74, 1-29.
46. Sperling, G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 5, 19-31.
47. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). Can mental rotation occur before the dual-task bottleneck? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 905-921.
48. Vogel, E.K., Luck, S.J., & Shapiro, K.L. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for a post-perceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1656-1674.
49. Welford, A.T. (1980). The single-channel hypothesis. In A.T. Welford (Ed.), Reaction time. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
50. Wolford, G. (1975). Perturbation model for letter identification. Psychological Review, 82, 184-190.