Power use in cooperative and competitive settings

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 291-300

  Van Knippenberg, Barbara ^a   Van Knippenberg, Daan ^b   Wilke, Henk A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047682543     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15324834BASP2304_5     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aguinis, H., & Adams, S. K. R. (1998). Social-role versus models of gender and influence use in organizations: A strong inference approach. Group and Organization Management, 23, 414-446.
2. Bacharach, S. B., & Lawler, E. J. (1981). Bargaining: Power, tactics and outcomes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Berger, J., Wagner, D., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1985). Expectation states theory: Review and assessment. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch (Eds.), Status, rewards and influence (pp. 1-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Berger, J., Webster, M., Jr., Ridgeway, C., & Rosenholtz, S. J. (1986). Status cues, expectations, and behavior, In E. J. Lawler(Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 3, pp. 1-22). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6. Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate statistical methods in behavioral research. New York: McGraw-Hill.
7. Bruins, J. (1997, April). Predicting the use of influence tactics: A classification and the role of group membership. Paper presented at the Power Dynamics and Organizational Change II Symposium of the Eighth European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology, Verona, Italy.
8. Camerer, C., & Thaler, R. H. (1995). Anomalies: Ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, 209-219.
9. Conner, T. L. (1977). Performance expectations and the initiation of problem solving attempts. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 5, 187-198.
10. Dahl, R. A. (1957).The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2, 201-218.
11. De Gilder, D., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1994). Expectation states theory and the motivational determinants of social influence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 243-269). London: Wiley.
12. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
13. Eberhardt, J., & Fiske, S. (1996). Motivating individuals to change: What is a target to do? In N. Macrea, C. Stangor, & M. Hewstone (Eds.), Stereotypes and stereotyping (pp. 369-415). New York: Guilford.
14. Farmer, S. M., Maslyn, J. M., Fedor, D. B., & Goodman, J. S. (1997). Putting upward influence strategies in context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 12-42.
15. Fiske, S. T., Morling, B., & Stevens, L. E. (1996). Controlling self and others: A theory of anxiety, mental control, and social control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 115-123.
16. French, J. R. P., Jr., & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
17. Friedland, N. (1976). Social influence via threats. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 552-563.
18. Greenberg, J. (1978). Effects of reward value and retaliative power on allocation decisions: Justice, generosity, or greed? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 367-379.
19. Hays, W. L. (1963). Statistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
20. Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, special fields and applications (pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
21. Hull, J. G., Tedlie, J. C., & Lehn, D. A. (1992). Moderator variables in personality research: The problem of controlling for plausible alternatives. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 115-117.
22. Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1986). Fairness as a constraint on profit seeking: Entitlements in the market. American Economic Review, 76, 728-741.
23. Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
24. Kimmel, M. J., Pruitt, D. G., Magenau, J. M., Konar-Goldband, E., & Carnevale, P. J. D. (1980). Effects of trust, aspiration, and gender on negotiation tactics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 9-22.
25. Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33-41.
26. Kipnis, D. (1976). The powerholders. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whistler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877-889.
28. McClelland, J. S. (1996). A history of Western political thought. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
29. Molm, M. D. (1985). Gender and power use: An experimental analysis of behavior and perceptions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 285-300.
30. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Boston: Pittman.
31. Poeschl, G. (1999, July). Family power and spouses' influence strategies. Paper presented at the General Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Oxford, UK.
32. Pruitt, D. G., & Carnevale, P. J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
33. Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict, escalation, stalemate and settlement. New York: Random House.
34. Raven, B. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
35. Skvoretz, J. (1995). Status characteristics, expectation dates, and participation in task groups. In J. Berger & M. Zelditeh (Eds.), Status, rewards and influence (pp. 163-188). San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.
36. Tepper, B. J., Brown, S. J., & Hunt, M. D. (1993). Strength of subordinates upward influence tactics and gender congruency effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1903-1919.
37. Tjosvold, D. (1981). Unequal power relationships within a cooperative or competitive context. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 11, 137-150.
38. Tjosvold, D. (1984). Influence strategy, perspective taking, and relationships between high-and low-power individuals in cooperative and competitive contexts. The Journal of Psychology, 116, 187-202.
39. Tjosvold, D. (1985). Power and social context in superior-subordinate interaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 35, 281-293.
40. Tjosvold, D. (1995). Effects of power to reward and punish in cooperative and competitive contexts. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 733-736.
41. van Dijk, E., & Vermunt, R. (2000). Strategy and fairness in social decision making: Sometimes it pays to be powerless. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 1-25.
42. van Knippenberg, B., & Steensma, H. (1999, May). An extended time horizon and the use of hard and soft influence tactics. Paper presented at the Power Dynamics and Organizational Change III Symposium of the Ninth European Congress on Work and Organizational Psychology, Helsinki, Finland.
43. van Knippenberg, B., van Knippenberg, D., Blaauw, E., & Vermunt, R. (1999). Relational considerations in the use of influence tactics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 806-819.
44. van Knippenberg, B., van Eijbergen, R., & Wilke, H. (1999). The use of hard and soft influence tactics in cooperative task groups. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 2, 231-244.
45. van Leeuwen, E., & van Knippenberg, D. (1999). Social value orientations and group performance: The role of expectations of other group members on effort. Manuscript submitted for publication.
46. Vecchio, R. P. (1997). Power, politics and influence. In R. P. Vecchio (Ed.), Leadership: Understanding the dynamics of power and influence in organizations (pp. 71-100). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1995)
47. Yukl, G., & Tracy, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 525-535.