The effect of arbitration program characteristics on applicants' intentions toward potential employers

Journal of Applied Psychology

Volumn 86, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 1006-1013

  Richey, Brenda ^b   Bernardin, H John ^a   Tyler, Catherine L ^b   McKinney, Nancy ^b  

^a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JOB FINDING; MALE; PERCEPTION; POLICY; RANDOMIZATION;

ADULT; DECISION MAKING; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; JOB APPLICATION; MALE; NEGOTIATING; ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY; PERCEPTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION;

EID: 85047682271     PISSN: 00219010     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.1006     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Americans With Disabilities Act. 42 U.S.C. § 12, 1-12, 13 (1994).
2. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
3. Barak, M. E. M., Cherin, D. A., & Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 34, 82-104.
4. Barber, A. E. (1998). Recruiting employees. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Bass, S. L. (1999). What the courts say about mandatory arbitration. Dispute Resolution Journal, 54(4), 24-31.
6. Bazerman, M. H., Schroth, H. A., Shah, P. P., Diekmann, K. A., & Tenbrunsel, A. E. (1994). The inconsistent role of comparison others and procedural justice in reactions to hypothetical job descriptions: Implications for job acceptance decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 60, 326-352.
7. Bingham, L. B. (1995). Is there a bias in arbitration of nonunion employment disputes? An analysis of actual cases and outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 6, 369-386.
8. Bloomberg, M. (1997). Staying out of the courtroom. Across the Board, 34(1), 36-37.
9. Breaugh, J. A. (1992). Recruitment: Science and practice. Boston: PWS-Kent.
10. Breaugh, J. A., & Billings, R. S. (1988). The realistic job preview: Five key elements and their importance for research and practice. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 291-305.
11. Brockner, J., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (1996). An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 189-208.
12. Caudron, S. (1997). Blow the whistle on employment disputes. Personnel Journal, 76(5), 50-57.
13. Civil Rights Reform Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981-1981a (1994).
14. Cobb, A. T., Folger, R., & Wooten, K. (1995). The role justice plays in organizational change. Public Administration Quarterly, 19, 135-151.
15. Cole, S. R. (1997). A funny thing happened on the way to the (alternative) forum: Reexamining Alexander v. Gardner-Denver in the wake of Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp. Brigham Young University Law Review, 3, 591-629.
16. EEOC v. Frank's Nursery & Crafts, No. 97-1698 (6th Cir. 1999).
17. Flynn, G. (1997, June). Mandatory binding arbitration - Ensure your plan is usable. Workforce, 76, 121-124.
18. Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A., & Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993). Corporate image, recruitment image, and initial job choice decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 414-427.
19. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corporation, 500 U.S. 20 (1991).
20. Goldberg, A. C. (1998). Top employment law issues for 1999. HR Focus, 75(12), S1-S3.
21. Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 334-342.
22. Hardin, P. D. (2000). Sacrificing statutory rights on the altar of pre-dispute employment agreements mandating arbitration. Capital University Law Review, 28, 455-477.
23. Highhouse, S., Stierwalt, S. L., Bachiochi, P., Elder, A. E., & Fisher, G. (1999). Effects of advertised human resource management practices on attraction of African-American applicants. Personnel Psychology, 52, 425-442.
24. Ilgen, D. R. (1986). Laboratory research: A question of when, not if. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (pp. 257-267), Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
25. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307-321.
26. Karambayya, R., & Brett, J. M. (1989). Managers handling disputes: Third-party roles and perceptions of fairness. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 687-704.
27. Kinnecome, D. M. (1999). Where procedure meets substance: Are arbitral procedures a method of weakening the substantive protections afforded by employment rights statutes? Boston University Law Review, 79, 745-777.
28. Levy, T. I. (1999). Designing a program for arbitration. Management Review, 88(10), 46-48.
29. Lewicki, R. J., & Sheppard, B. H. (1985). Choosing how to intervene: Factors affecting the use of process and outcome control in third party dispute resolution. Journal of Occupational Behaviour, 6, 49-64.
30. Lind, E. A., & Tyler T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
31. McGeehan, P. (1998, May 11). Federal court rules employees can't be denied day in court in bias cases. Wall Street Journal, p. A4.
32. Nicolau, G. (1996). Future of labor arbitration. Dispute Resolution Journal, 51, 74-81.
33. Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., & Chitstiansen, N. D. (1997). Support for affirmative action, justice perceptions, and work attitudes: A study of gender and racial-ethnic group differences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 376-389.
34. Perkins Coie LLP. (1997). Don't litigate, arbitrate! Oregon Employment Law Letter, 4(1), 2.
35. Phillips, G. F. (2000). What your client needs to know about ADR. Dispute Resolution Journal, 55, 64-68.
36. Rynes, S. L., & Barber, A. E. (1990). Applicant attraction strategies: An organizational perspective. Academy of Management Review, 15, 286-311.
37. Rynes, S. L., Bretz, R. D., Jr., & Gerhart, B. (1991). Importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking. Personnel Psychology, 44, 487-521.
38. Schwoerer, C., & Rosen, B. (1989). Effects of employment-at-will policies and compensation policies on corporate image and job pursuit intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 653-656.
39. Siegal, J. S. (1997). Changing public policy: Private arbitration to resolve statutory employment disputes. Labor Lawyer, 13(1), 86-106.
40. Stallworth, L. E., & Stroh, L. K. (1996). Who is seeking to use ADR? Dispute Resolution Journal 51, 30-38.
41. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658-672.
43. Turban, D. B., & Keon, T. L. (1993). Organizational attractiveness: An, interactionist perspective. Journal of Applied Psvchologv, 78, 184-193.
44. Tyler, T. R. (1989). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
45. van des Bos, K., Wilke, A. M., & Lind, E. A. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1449-1458.
46. Wanous, J. P., & Colella, A. (1989). Organizational entry research: Current status and future research directions. In K. Rowland & G. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources (Vol. 7, pp. 59-120). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
47. Zack, A. M. (1997). Can alternative dispute resolution help resolve employment disputes.? International Labour Review, 136, 95-108.
48. Zinsser, J. W. (1996). Employment dispute resolution systems: Experience grows but some questions persist. Negotiation Journal, 12, 151-165.