Microvesicles shed from fibroblasts act as metalloproteinase carriers in a 3-D collagen matrix

Journal of Circulating Biomarkers

Volumn 5, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Laghezza Masci, Valentina ^a   Taddei, Anna Rita ^a   Gambellini, Gabriella ^a   Giorgi, Franco ^b   Fausto, Anna Maria ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

collagen matrix; ectosome; exosome; metalloproteinase; Microvesicles

Indexed keywords

EID: 85047558390     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18494544     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1849454416663660     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Gilbert SF. Cell-cell comunication in development. In: Sinauer Associates, (ed) Developmental biology. 7th ed. Sunderland: Elsevier Science, 2000, pp. 143–179
2. Goodenough DA, Paul DL. Gap junctions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009; 1: a002576
3. De Broe ME, Wieme RJ, Logghe GN. Spontaneous shedding of plasma membrane fragments by human cells in vivo and in vitro. Clin Chim Acta 1977; 81: 237–245
4. Vittorelli ML. Shed membrane vesicles and clustering of membrane-bound proteolytic enzymes. Curr Top Dev Biol 2003; 54: 411–432
5. Ratajczak J, Wysoczynski M, Hayek F. Membrane-derived microvesicles: important and underappreciated mediators of cell-to-cell communication. Leukemia 2006; 20(9): 1487–1495
6. Cocucci E, Racchetti G, Meldolesi J. Shedding microvesicles: artefacts no more. Trends Cell Biol 2009; 19(2): 43–51
7. Pap E, Pállinger É, Falus A. The role of membrane vesicles in tumorigenesis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011; 79(3): 213–223
8. Turturici G, Tinnirello R, Sconzo G. Extracellular membrane vesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication: advantages and disadvantages. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2014; 306(7): C621–C633
9. Heijnen HF, Schiel AE, Fijnheer R. Activated platelets release two types of membrane vesicles: microvesicles by surface shedding and exosomes derived from exocytosis of multivesicular bodies and alpha-granules. Blood 1999; 94: 3791–3799
10. Théry C. Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. Biol Rep 2011; 3: 15
11. Cocucci E, Racchetti G, Podini P. Enlargeosome traffic: exocytosis triggered by various signals is followed by endocytosis, membrane shedding or both. Traffic 2007; 8: 742–757
12. Deregibus MC, Cantaluppi V, Calogero R. Endothelial progenitor cell derived microvesicles activate an angiogenic program in endothelial cells by a horizontal transfer of mRNA. Blood 2007; 110: 2440–2448
13. Mathivanan S, Ji H, Simpson RJ. Exosomes: extracellular organelles important in intercellular communication. J Proteomics 2010; 73(10): 1907–1920
14. Ginestra A, La Placa MD, Saladino F. The amount and proteolytic content of vesicles shed by human cancer cell lines correlates with their in vitro invasiveness. Anticancer Res 1998; 18: 3433–3437
15. Ginestra A, Miceli D, Dolo V. Membrane vesicles in ovarian cancer fluids: a new potential marker. Anticancer Res 1999; 19: 3439–3445
16. Sidhu SS, Mengistab AT, Tauscher AN. The microvesicle as a vehicle for EMMPRIN in tumor-stromal interactions. Oncogene 2004; 23: 956–963
17. Collino F, Deregibus MC, Bruno S. Microvesicles derived from adult human bone marrow and tissue specific mesenchymal stem cells shuttle selected pattern of miRNAs. PLoS One 2010; 5(7): e11803
18. Camussi G, Deregibus MC, Bruno S. Exosome/microvesicle-mediated epigenetic reprogramming of cells. Am J Cancer Res 2011; 1(1): 98–110
19. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature 2008; 453(7193): 314–321
20. Diegelmann RF, Evans MC. Wound healing: an overview of acute, fibrotic and delayed healing. Front Biosci 2004; 9: 283–289
21. Carlson MA, Longaker MT. The fibroblast-populated collagen matrix as a model of wound healing: a review of the evidence. Wound Repair Regen 2004; 12(2): 134–147
22. Yun YR, Won JE, Jeon E. Fibroblast growth factors: biology, function, and application for tissue regeneration. Tissue Eng 2010; 2010: 218142
23. Guo S, DiPietro LA. Factor affecting wound healing. J Dent Res 2010; 89(3): 219–229
24. McDougall S, Dallon J, Sherratt J. Fibroblast migration and collagen deposition during dermal wound healing: mathematical modelling and clinical implications. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci 2006; 364(1843): 1385–1405
25. Nedelec B, Ghahary A, Scott PG. Control of wound contraction. Basic and clinical features. Hand Clin 2000; 16(2): 289–302
26. Madsen DH, Engelholm LH, Ingvarsen S. Extracellular collagenases and the endocytic receptor, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor-associated protein/Endo180, cooperate in fibroblast-mediated collagen degradation. J Biol Chem 2007; 282(37): 27037–27045
27. Rohani MG, Chow YH, Razumova MV. uPARAP function in cutaneous wound repair. PLoS One 2014; 9(3): e92660
28. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev 2003; 83: 835–870
29. Armstrong DG, Jude EB. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in wound healing. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002; 92(1): 12–18
30. Grotendorst GR, Rahmanie H, Duncan MR. Combinatorial signaling pathways determine fibroblast proliferation and myofibroblast differentiation. FASEB J 2004; 18(3): 469–479
31. Everts V, van der Zee E, Creeemers L. Phagocytosis and intracellular digestion of collagen, its role in turnover and remodelling. Histochem J 1996; 28(4): 229–245
32. Abraham LC, Dice JF, Lee K. Phagocytosis and remodeling of collagen matrices. Exp Cell Res 2007; 313(5): 1045–1055
33. Löffek S, Schilling O, Franzke CW. Series “matrix metalloproteinases in lung health and disease”: biological role of matrix metalloproteinases: a critical balance. Eur Respir J 2011; 38(1): 191–208
34. Gaffney J, Solomonov I, Zehorai E. Multilevel regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in tissue homeostasis indicates their molecular specificity in vivo. Matrix Biol 2015; 44–46C: 191–199
35. Fanjul-Fernández M, Folgueras AR, Cabrera S. Matrix metalloproteinases: evolution, gene regulation and functional analysis in mouse models. Biochim Biophys Acta 2010; 1803(1): 3–19
36. Chakraborti S, Mandal M, Das S. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases: an overview. Mol Cell Biochem 2003; 253: 269–285
37. Maretzky T, Yang G, Ouerfelli O. Characterization of the catalytic activity of the membrane-anchored metalloproteinase ADAM15 in cell-based assays. Biochem J 2009; 420(1): 105–113
38. Tocchi A, Parks WC. Functional interactions between matrix metalloproteinases and glycosaminoglycans. FEBS J 2013; 280(10): 2332–2341
39. Adam JC. Heavy metal intensification of DAB-based HRP reaction product HRP reaction product. J Histochem Cytochem 1981; 29(6): 775
40. Toth M, Fridman R. Assessment of gelatinases (MMP-2 and MMP-9) by gelatin zymography. Methods Mol Med 2001; 57: 163–174
41. Laghezza Masci V, Taddei AR, Gambellini G. Ultrastructural investigation on fibroblast interaction with collagen scaffold. J Biomed Mater Res A 2016; 104(1): 272–282
42. Nagase H, Visse R, Murphy G. Structure and function of matrix metalloproteinases and TIMPs. Cardiovasc Res 2006; 69: 562–573
43. Frankowski H, Gu YH, Heo JH. Use of gel zymography to examine matrix metalloproteinase (gelatinase) expression in brain tissue or in primary glial cultures. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 814: 221–233
44. Lee TH, D’Asti E, Magnus N. Microvesicles as mediators of intercellular communication in cancer – the emerging science of cellular ‘debris’. Semin Immunopathol 2011; 33(5): 455–467
45. Furuhata S, Nemoto N, Miyazawa S. Pitfalls in the double labelling immunoelectron microscopy using one face of the grid. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 1992; 41(2): 120–122
46. Agren M, Jorgensen LN, Andersen M. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 level predicts optimal collagen deposition during early wound repair in humans. Br J Surg 1998; 85(1): 68–71
47. Dittmer J, Leyh B. Paracrine effects of stem cells in wound healing and cancer progression (Review). Int J Oncol 2014; 44: 1789–1798
48. Muralidharan-Chari V, Clancy JW, Sedgwick A. Microvesicles: mediators of extracellular communication during cancer progression. J Cell Sci 2010; 123: 1603–1611
49. Fertig ET, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Extracellular vesicles release by cardiac telocytes: electron microscopy and electron tomography. J Cell Mol Med 2015; 18: 1938–1943
50. Faussone Pellegrini M-S, Popescu LM. Telocytes. BioMol Concepts 2011; 2(6): 481–489
51. Ceafalan L, Gherghiceanu M, Popescu LM. Telocytes in human skin – are they involved in skin regeneration? J Cell Mol Med 2012; 16: 1405–1420
52. Akers JC, Gonda D, Kim R. Biogenesis of extracellular vesicles (EV): exosomes, microvesicles, retrovirus-like vesicles, and apoptotic bodies. J Neurooncol 2013; 113: 1–11
53. Andreu Z, Yáñez-Mó M. Tetraspanins in extracellular vesicle formation and function. Front Immunol 2014; 5: 442
54. Cocucci E, Meldolesi J. Ectosomes and exosomes: shedding the confusion between extracellular vesicles. Trends Cell Biol 2015; 25(6): 364–372
55. Abel M, Vliagoftis H. Mast cell-fibroblast interactions induce MMP-9 release from fibroblasts: role for IgE-mediated mast cell activation. J Immunol 2008; 180: 3543–3550
56. Brett D. A review of collagen and collagen-based wound dressings. Wounds 2008; 20(12): 347–356