A swinging seesaw as a novel model mechanism for time-dependent hormesis under dose-dependent stimulatory and inhibitory effects: A case study on the toxicity of antibacterial chemicals to Aliivibrio fischeri

Chemosphere

Volumn 205, Issue , 2018, Pages 15-23

  Sun, Haoyu ^a   Calabrese, Edward J ^b   Zheng, Min ^a   Wang, Dali ^a   Pan, Yongzheng ^c   Lin, Zhifen ^a,d,e   Liu, Ying ^d  

^a TONGJI UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

^c SHANGHAI OCEAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^d Shanghai Key Laboratory of Chemical Assessment and Sustainability   (China)

^e INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Aliivibrio fischeri; Antibacterial chemical; Hormesis; Swinging seesaw; Time dependent

Indexed keywords

BIOLUMINESCENCE; DYNAMICS; MEDICINE; PLANTS (BOTANY); TOXICITY;

ALIIVIBRIO FISCHERI; ANTIBACTERIAL CHEMICALS; HORMESIS; SWINGING SEESAW; TIME DEPENDENT;

INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; BENZOFURAN DERIVATIVE; FURANONE DERIVATIVE; MESSENGER RNA; SULFAPYRIDINE; TETRACYCLINE; TRIMETHOPRIM;

ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY; BACTERIUM; BIOLUMINESCENCE; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; GENE EXPRESSION; MODEL; PROTEIN; RNA; TIME DEPENDENT BEHAVIOR; TOXICITY;

ALIIVIBRIO FISCHERI; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLUMINESCENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION; HORMESIS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUORUM SENSING; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RESPIRATORY CHAIN; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TIME-DEPENDENT INHIBITION; TOXICITY TESTING; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; EVOLUTION; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS);

ALIIVIBRIO FISCHERI; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HORMESIS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; QUORUM SENSING;

EID: 85047420197     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.043     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Calabrese, E.J., Overcompensation stimulation: a mechanism for hormetic effects. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 31 (2001), 425–470.
2. Calabrese, E.J., Paradigm lost, paradigm found: the re-emergence of hormesis as a fundamental dose response model in the toxicological sciences. Environ. Pollut. 138 (2005), 378–411, 10.1016/j.envpol.2004.10.001.
3. Calabrese, E.J., Hormesis: why it is important to toxicology and toxicologists. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27 (2008), 1451–1474, 10.1897/07-541.1.
4. Calabrese, E.J., Hormetic mechanisms. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 43 (2013), 580–606, 10.3109/10408444.2013.808172.
5. Calabrese, E.J., Hormesis within a mechanistic context. Homeopathy 104 (2015), 90–96, 10.1016/j.homp.2015.01.002.
6. Calabrese, E.J., Baldwin, L.A., Hormesis as a biological hypothesis. Environ. Health Perspect. 106 (1998), 357–362.
7. Calabrese, E.J., Baldwin, L.A., Agonist concentration gradients as a generalizable regulatory implementation strategy. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 31 (2001), 471–473.
8. Calabrese, E.J., Baldwin, L.A., Defining hormesis. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 21 (2002), 91–97, 10.1191/0960327102ht217oa.
9. Calabrese, E.J., Baldwin, L.A., Toxicology rethinks its central belief. Nature 421 (2003), 691–692, 10.1038/421691a.
10. Calabrese, E.J., Baldwin, L.A., Hormesis: the dose-response revolution. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 43 (2003), 175–197, 10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.43.100901.140223.
11. Christofi, N., Hoffmann, C., Tosh, L., Hormesis responses of free and immobilized light-emitting bacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 52 (2002), 227–231, 10.1006/eesa.2002.2203.
12. Defoirdt, T., Miyamoto, C.M., Wood, T.K., Meighen, E.A., Sorgeloos, P., Verstraete, W., Bossier, P., The natural furanone (5Z)-4-bromo-5-(bromomethylene)-3-butyl-2(5H)-furanone disrupts quorum sensing-regulated gene expression in Vibrio harveyi by decreasing the DNA-binding activity of the transcriptional regulator protein LuxR. Environ. Microbiol. 9 (2007), 2486–2495, 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01367.x.
13. Deng, Z., Lin, Z., Zou, X., Yao, Z., Tian, D., Wang, D., Yin, D., Model of hormesis and its toxicity mechanism based on quorum sensing: a case study on the toxicity of sulfonamides to Photobacterium phosphoreum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46 (2012), 7746–7754, 10.1021/es203490f.
14. Froehner, K., Meyer, W., Grimme, L., Time-dependent toxicity in the long-term inhibition assay with Vibrio fischeri. Chemosphere 46 (2002), 987–997, 10.1016/S0045-6535(01)00209-0.
15. Fulladosa, E., Murat, J., Villaescusa, I., Effect of cadmium (II), chromium (VI), and arsenic (V) on long-term viability-and growth-inhibition assays using Vibrio fischeri marine bacteria. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 49 (2005), 299–306, 10.1007/s00244-004-0170-5.
16. Ge, H., Liu, S., Zhu, X., Liu, H., Wang, L., Predicting hormetic effects of ionic liquid mixtures on luciferase activity using the concentration addition model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45 (2010), 1623–1629, 10.1021/es1018948.
17. Girotti, S., Ferri, E.N., Fumo, M.G., Maiolini, E., Monitoring of environmental pollutants by bioluminescent bacteria. Anal. Chim. Acta 608 (2008), 2–29, 10.1016/j.aca.2007.12.008.
18. Hash, J.H., Wishnick, M., Miller, P.A., On the mode of action of the tetracycline antibiotics in Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 239 (1964), 2070–2078.
19. Henry, R.J., The mode of action of sulfonamides. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 7 (1943), 175–262.
20. Hitchings, G.H., Mechanism of action of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole—I. J. Infect. Dis. 128 (1973), 433–436, 10.1093/infdis/128.Supplement_3.S433.
21. Paalzow, L.K., Paalzow, G.H., Concentration-response relations for apomorphine effects on heart rate in conscious rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 38 (1986), 28–34, 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1986.tb04462.x.
22. Ranke, J., Mölter, K., Stock, F., Bottin-Weber, U., Poczobutt, J., Hoffmann, J., Ondruschka, B., Filser, J., Jastorff, B., Biological effects of imidazolium ionic liquids with varying chain lengths in acute Vibrio fischeri and WST-1 cell viability assays. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 58 (2004), 96–404, 10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00105-2.
23. Rasmussen, T.B., Givskov, M., Quorum-sensing inhibitors as anti-pathogenic drugs. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 296 (2006), 149–161, 10.1016/j.ijmm.2006.02.005.
24. Schultz, T.W., Cronin, M.T., Walker, J.D., Aptula, A.O., Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: a historical perspective. J. Mol. Struct. TheoChem. 622 (2003), 1–22, 10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00614-0.
25. Shen, K., Shen, C., Lu, Y., Tang, X., Zhang, C., Chen, X., Shi, J., Lin, Q., Chen, Y., Hormesis response of marine and freshwater luminescent bacteria to metal exposure. Biol. Res. 42 (2009), 183–187, 10.4067/S0716-97602009000200006.
26. Stebbing, A., Hormesis—the stimulation of growth by low levels of inhibitors. Sci. Total Environ. 22 (1982), 213–234, 10.1016/0048-9697(82)90066-3.
27. Szabadi, E., A model of two functionally antagonistic receptor populations activated by the same agonist. J. Theor. Biol. 69 (1977), 101–112, 10.1016/0022-5193(77)90390-3.
28. You, R., Sun, H., Yu, Y., Lin, Z., Qin, M., Liu, Y., Time-dependent hormesis of chemical mixtures: a case study on sulfa antibiotics and a quorum-sensing inhibitor of Vibrio fischeri. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 41 (2016), 45–53, 10.1016/j.etap.2015.10.013.