Impacts of transit and walking amenities on robust local knowledge economy

Cities

Volumn 81, Issue , 2018, Pages 161-171

  Zandiatashbar, Ahoura ^a   Hamidi, Shima ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Creative industries; Innovation; KIBS; Knowledge economy; Transit; Walkability

Indexed keywords

AMENITY; CREATIVE INDUSTRY; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY; NEIGHBORHOOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE; URBAN DEVELOPMENT; WALKING;

JAPAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85046723054     PISSN: 02642751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2018.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Acs, Z.J., Anselin, L., Varga, A., Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy 31:7 (2002), 1069–1085.
2. Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P., R&D spillovers and innovative activity. Managerial and Decision Economics 15:2 (1994), 131–138.
3. Aghion, P., Akcigit, U., Bergeaud, A., Blundell, R., Hémous, D., Innovation and top income inequality. 2015, National Bureau of Economic Research.
4. Appleyard, B., Ferrell, C.E., Taecker, M., Toward a typology of transit corridor livability. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2543 (2016), 71–81, 10.3141/2543-08.
5. Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P., R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review 86:3 (1996), 630–640.
6. Audretsch, D.B., Feldman, M.P., Knowledge spillovers and the geography of innovation. Handbook of regional and urban economics, Vol. 4, 2004, Elsevier, 2713–2739.
7. Bakhshi, H., McVittie, E., Simmie, J., Creating Innovation: Do the creative industries support innovation in the wider economy?. 2008 Nesta London.
8. Bereitschaft, B., Cammack, R., Neighborhood diversity and the creative class in Chicago. Applied Geography 63 (2015), 166–183.
9. Bereitschaft, B., Cammack, R., Neighborhood diversity plays a limited role in the residential preferences of creative class workers in Chicago. 2015, USApp–American Politics and Policy Blog.
10. Black, G., The geography of small firm innovation. Vol. 1, 2005, Springer Science & Business Media.
11. Boschma, R., Proximity and innovation: A critical assessment. Regional Studies 39:1 (2005), 61–74.
12. Cervero, R., Radisch, C., Travel choices in pedestrian versus automobile oriented neighborhoods. Transport Policy 3:3 (1996), 127–141.
13. Chatman, D.G., Noland, R.B., Do public transport improvements increase agglomeration economies? A review of literature and an agenda for research. Transport Reviews 31:6 (2011), 725–742.
14. Combes, P.P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., The identification of agglomeration economies. Journal of Economic Geography 11:2 (2010), 253–266.
15. Cooke, P., Regional innovation systems, clusters, and the knowledge economy. Industrial and Corporate Change 10:4 (2001), 945–974.
16. Cooke, P., Leydesdorff, L., Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: The construction of advantage. The Journal of Technology Transfer 31:1 (2006), 5–15.
17. Credit, K., Transit-oriented economic development: The impact of light rail on new business starts in the Phoenix, AZ Region, USA. Urban Studies, 1-25, 2017, 10.1177/0042098017724119 0042098017724119.
18. Crescenzi, R., Rodriguez-Pose, A., Storper, M., The territorial dynamics of innovation: A Europe–United States comparative analysis. Journal of Economic Geography 7:6 (2007), 673–709.
19. Doloreux, D., Shearmur, R., How much does KIBS contribute to R&D activities of manufacturing firms. Economia politica 29:3 (2012), 319–341.
20. Doloreux, D., Amara, N., Landry, R., Mapping regional and sectoral characteristics of knowledge‐intensive business services: Evidence from the Province of Quebec (Canada). Growth and Change 39:3 (2008), 464–496.
21. ESRI, ArcGIS Business Analyst. 2017 Available at: http://www.esri.com/software/arcgis/extensions Accessed November 2017.
22. Europe 2020 indicators - R&D and innovation - Statistics Explained, Retrieved February 8, 2018, from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Europe_2020_indicators_-_R%26D_and_innovation, 2010.
23. Feldman, M.P., Florida, R., The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84:2 (1994), 210–229.
24. Fetter, F.A., Alfred Weber's theory of the location of industries. 1930, JSTOR.
25. Florida, R., The rise of the creative class. The Washington Monthly 34:5 (2002), 15–25.
26. Florida, R., The economic geography of talent. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 92:4 (2002), 743–755.
27. Florida, R., The rise of the creative class–revisited: Revised and expanded. 2014, Basic Books, AZ.
28. Furman, J.L., Porter, M.E., Stern, S., The determinants of national innovative capacity. Research Policy 31:6 (2002), 899–933.
29. Gallouj, F., Knowledge-intensive business services: Processing knowledge and producing innovation. Productivity, Innovation and Knowledge in Services: New Economic and Socio-Economic Approaches, 256, 2002.
30. Gilderbloom, J.I., Riggs, W.W., Meares, W.L., Does walkability matter? An examination of walkability's impact on housing values, foreclosures and crime. Cities 42 (2015), 13–24.
31. Grabher, G., The weakness of strong ties; the lock-in of regional development in Ruhr area. The embedded firm; on the socioeconomics of industrial networks, 1993, 255–277.
32. Grace, J.B., Structural equation modeling and natural systems. 2006, Cambridge University Press.
33. Hamidi, S., Measuring metropolitan form: Remaking urban form for sustainability. 2015, The University of Utah.
34. Hamidi, S., Ewing, R., Renne, J., How affordable is HUD affordable housing?. Housing Policy Debate 26:3 (2016), 437–455.
35. Hamidi, S., Zandiatashbar, A., Does built environment matter for innovation? A quantitative study of the physical assets of innovation districts in the United States (No. 17-05704). 2017.
36. Hamidi, S., Zandiatashbar, A., The forgotten dimension: National investigation of the relationship between urban sprawl, transportation accessibility, and regional innovative capacity (No. 17-02505). 2017.
37. Hamidi, S., Zandiatashbar, A., Does urban form matter for innovation productivity? A national multi-level study of the association between neighbourhood innovation capacity and urban spraw. Urban Studies, 2018, 10.1177/0042098018767002.
38. Hertog, P.d., Knowledge-intensive business services as co-producers of innovation. International Journal of Innovation Management 4:04 (2000), 491–528.
39. Hoyman, M., Faricy, C., It takes a village: A test of the creative class, social capital, and human capital theories. Urban Affairs Review 44:3 (2009), 311–333.
40. Huang, Y., Bocchi, A.M., (eds.) Reshaping economic geography in East Asia, 2008, World Bank Publications.
41. Jacobs, J., The economy of cities. 1969, Vintage Books.
42. Joseph, M., Mullen, E.W., Spake, D., University branding: Understanding students’ choice of an educational institution. Journal of Brand Management 20:1 (2012), 1–12, 10.1057/bm.2012.13.
43. Klein, N.J., Smart, M.J., Millennials and car ownership: Less money, fewer cars. Transport Policy 53 (2017), 20–29.
44. Knudsen, B., Florida, R., Stolarick, K., Gates, G., Density and creativity in US regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98:2 (2008), 461–478.
45. Leinberger, C.B., Lynch, P., The Walk-Up Wake-Up Call, Boston. Center for Real Estate and Urban Analysis, 2015, The George Washington University School of Business, Washington, DC.
46. Markusen, A., Wassall, G.H., DeNatale, D., Cohen, R., Defining the creative economy: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly 22:1 (2008), 24–25.
47. Marshall, A., Principles of economics: Unabridged. eighth edition, 2009, Cosimo, Inc.
48. Müller, K., Rammer, C., Trüby, J., The role of creative industries in industrial innovation. Innovations 11:2 (2009), 148–168.
49. Muro, M., Rothwell, J., Andes, S., Fikri, K., Kulkarni, S., America's advanced industries: What they are, where they are, and why they matter. 2015, Brookings.
50. Nase, I., Berry, J., Adair, A., Real estate value and quality design in commercial office properties. Journal of European Real Estate Research 6:1 (2013), 48–62.
51. Nelson, A.C., Transit stations and commercial property values: A case study with policy and land-use implications. Journal of Public Transportation, 2(3), 1999, 4.
52. Noland, R.B., Chatman, D., Klein, N.J., Transit access and the agglomeration of new firms: A case study of Portland and Dallas. 2014, Mineta National Transit Research Consortium.
53. Pacione, M., Urban liveability: A review. Urban Geography 11:1 (1990), 1–30.
54. Pivo, G., Fisher, J.D., The walkability premium in commercial real estate investments. Real Estate Economics 39:2 (2011), 185–219.
55. Ramsey, K., Bell, A., Access to Jobs and Workers via Transit. 2014, US EPA Office of Sustainable Communities, Washington, DC https://edg.epa.gov/data/Public/OP/SLD/SLD_Trans45_UG.pdf.
56. Rao, Y., Dai, D., Creative class concentrations in Shanghai, China: What is the role of neighborhood social tolerance and life quality supportive conditions?. Social Indicators Research 132:3 (2017), 1237–1246.
57. Rausch, S., Negrey, C., Does the creative engine run? A consideration of the effect of creative class on economic strength and growth. Journal of Urban Affairs 28:5 (2006), 473–489.
58. Ruan, J., Zhang, X., Finance and cluster-based industrial development in China. Economic Development and Cultural Change 58:1 (2009), 143–164.
59. Sanchez, T.W., Shen, Q., Peng, Z.-R., Transit mobility, jobs access and low-income labour participation in US metropolitan areas. Urban Studies 41:7 (2004), 1313–1331.
60. Scott, A.J., Creative cities: Conceptual issues and policy questions. Journal of Urban Affairs 28:1 (2006), 1–17.
61. Shearmur, R., Scale, distance and embeddedness: Knowledge-intensive business services location and growth in Canada. 2010, Knowledge-Intensive Business Services: Geography and Innovation, 43–74.
62. Shearmur, R., The geography of intrametropolitan KIBS innovation: Distinguishing agglomeration economies from innovation dynamics. Urban Studies 49:11 (2012), 2331–2356.
63. Storper, M., Venables, A.J., Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography 4:4 (2004), 351–370.
64. TransitCenter, Who's on board: 2014 mobility attitudes survey. 2016, Transit Center New York, NY Retrieved from http://Transitcenter.Org/Wp-Content/Uploads/2014/08/WhosOnBoard2014-ForWeb.Pdf. (Accessed 10 November 2018)
65. Trip, J.J., Assessing quality of place: a comparative analysis of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. Journal of Urban Affairs 29:5 (2007), 501–517.
66. Uppenberg, K., The knowledge economy in Europe: A review of the 2009 EIB Conference in Economics and Finance. 2010 Annual Economic Conference and Publication.
67. Urban Land Institute, Urban Land Institute. (2015). America in 2015: A ULI survey of views on housing, transportation, and community. 2015, June 15, Urban Land Institute. - Google Search, Washington, DC (Retrieved February 21, 2018, from).
68. Van der Panne, G., Agglomeration externalities: Marshall versus jacobs. Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14:5 (2004), 593–604.
69. Wallsten, S.J., An empirical test of geographic knowledge spillovers using geographic information systems and firm-level data. Regional Science and Urban Economics 31:5 (2001), 571–599.
70. Weber, A., Theory of the location of industries. 1929, University of Chicago Press.
71. Weissmann, J., Why don't young Americans buy cars? - The Atlantic. Retrieved February 20, 2018, from https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2012/03/why-dont-young-americans-buy-cars/255001/, 2012, March 25.
72. Wood, S., Dovey, K., Creative multiplicities: Urban morphologies of creative clustering. Journal of Urban Design 20:1 (2015), 52–74.