Logistic LASSO regression for the diagnosis of breast cancer using clinical demographic data and the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography

Ultrasonography

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 36-42

  Kim, Sun Mi ^a   Kim, Yongdai ^b   Jeong, Kuhwan ^b   Jeong, Heeyeong ^a   Kim, Jiyoung ^a  

^a Seoul National University Bundang Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Breast; Breast neoplasms; Diagnosis; Logistic models; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; BENIGN NEOPLASM; BODY WEIGHT; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CALCIFICATION; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; FINE NEEDLE ASPIRATION BIOPSY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INCIDENCE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVENTIONAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASM; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL RECORD; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME;

EID: 85046455671     PISSN: 22885919     EISSN: 22885943     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14366/usg.16045     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sickles EA, Wolverton DE, Dee KE. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002;224:861-869.
2. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, breast imaging atlas. 4th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003.
3. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Williford ME, Floyd CE Jr. Breast cancer: prediction with artificial neural network based on BI-RADS standardized lexicon. Radiology 1995;196:817-822.
4. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Lo JY, Floyd CE Jr. Artificial neural network: improving the quality of breast biopsy recommendations. Radiology 1996;198:131-135.
5. Chhatwal J, Alagoz O, Lindstrom MJ, Kahn CE Jr., Shaffer KA, Burnside ES. A logistic regression model based on the national mammography database format to aid breast cancer diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192:1117-1127.
6. Houssami N, Irwig L, Simpson JM, McKessar M, Blome S, Noakes J. The influence of clinical information on the accuracy of diagnostic mammography. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004;85:223-228.
7. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol 1996;58:267-288.
8. Bickel PJ, Ritov Y, Tsybakov AB. Simultaneous analysis of Lasso and dantzig selector. Ann Stat 2009;37:1705-1732.
9. Efron B, Hastie T, Johnstone I, Tibshirani R. Least angle regression. Ann Stat 2004;32:407-451.
10. Lee S, Kwon S, Kim Y. A modified local quadratic approximation algorithm for penalized optimization problems. Comput Stat Data Anal 2016;94:275-286.
11. Ackermann S, Schoenenberger CA, Zanetti-Dallenbach R. Clinical data as an adjunct to ultrasound reduces the false-negative malignancy rate in BI-RADS 3 breast lesions. Ultrasound Int Open 2016;2:E83-E89.
12. Ayer T, Chhatwal J, Alagoz O, Kahn CE Jr., Woods RW, Burnside ES. Informatics in radiology: comparison of logistic regression and artificial neural network models in breast cancer risk estimation. Radiographics 2010;30:13-22.
13. Kim SM, Han H, Park JM, Choi YJ, Yoon HS, Sohn JH, et al. A comparison of logistic regression analysis and an artificial neural network using the BI-RADS lexicon for ultrasonography in conjunction with introbserver variability. J Digit Imaging 2012;25:599-606.
14. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2005;67:301-320.
15. Huang J, Ma S, Li H, Zhang CH. The sparse Laplacian shrinkage estimator for high-dimensional regression. Ann Stat 2011;39:2021-2046.