Economic Inequality and the Value of Nature

Ecological Economics

Volumn 150, Issue , 2018, Pages 340-345

  Drupp, Moritz A ^a,b   Meya, Jasper N ^c,d   Baumgärtner, Stefan ^e   Quaas, Martin F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Distribution; Environmental goods; Income inequality; Nature conservation; Valuation; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045856061     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.03.029     Document Type: Note

References (76)

1. Adler, M.D., Benefit–cost analysis and distributional weights: an overview. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:2 (2016), 264–285.
2. Anthoff, D., Hepburn, C., Tol, R.S., Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol. Econ. 68:3 (2009), 836–849.
3. Atkinson, G., Mourato, S., Environmental cost-benefit analysis. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 33 (2008), 317–344.
4. Barbier, E.B., Baumgärtner, S., Chopra, K., Costello, C., Duraiappah, A., Hassan, R., Kinzig, A.P., Lehman, M., Pascual, U., Polasky, S., Perrings, C., The valuation of environmental goods. Naeem, S., Bunker, D.E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., Perrings, C., (eds.) Biodiversity, Ecosystem Functioning, and Human Wellbeing, 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 248–262.
5. Barbier, E.B., Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., Is the income elasticity of the willingness to pay for pollution control constant?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 68 (2017), 663–682.
6. Barrage, L., Be careful what you calibrate for: social discounting in general equilibrium. J. Public Econ. 160C (2018), 33–49.
7. Bateman, I.J., Harwood, A., Mace, G.M., Watson, R., Abson, D.J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., Day, B.H., Dugdale, S., Fezzi, C., Foden, J., Haines-Young, R., Hulme, M., Kontoleon, A., Lovett, A.A., Munday, P., Pascual, U., Paterson, J., Perino, G., Sen, A., Siriwardena, G., van Soest, D., Termansen, M., Bringing environmental goods into economic decision making: land use in the UK. Science 341:6141 (2013), 45–50.
8. Baumgärtner, S., Quaas, M.F., What is sustainability economics?. Ecol. Econ. 69:3 (2010), 445–450.
9. Baumgärtner, S., Klein, A.-M., Thiel, D., Winkler, K., Ramsey discounting of ecosystem services. Environ. Resour. Econ. 61:2 (2015), 273–296.
10. Baumgärtner, S., Drupp, M.A., Munz, J.M., Meya, J.N., Quaas, M.F., Income inequality and willingness to pay for environmental public goods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 85 (2017), 35–61.
11. Baumgärtner, S., Drupp, M.A., Quaas, M.F., Subsistence, substitutability and sustainability in consumption. Environ. Resour. Econ. 67:1 (2017), 47–66.
12. Bento, A.M., Equity impacts of environmental policy. Ann. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5:1 (2013), 181–196.
13. Bento, A., Freedman, M., Lang, C., Who benefits from environmental regulation? Evidence from the clean air act amendments. Rev. Econ. Stat. 97:3 (2015), 610–622.
14. Bishop, R.C., Boyle, K.J., Carson, R.T., Chapman, D., Hanemann, W.M., Kanninen, B., Kopp, R.J., Krosnick, J.A., List, J., Meade, N., Paterson, R., Presser, S., Smith, V.K., Tourangeau, R., Welsh, M., Wooldridge, J.M., DeBell, M., Donovan, C., Konopka, M., Scherer, N., Putting a value on injuries to natural assets: The BP oil spill. Science 356:6335 (2017), 253–254.
15. Boyce, J.K., Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecol. Econ. 11:3 (1994), 169–178.
16. Boyce, J.K., Klemer, A.R., Templet, P.H., Willis, C.E., Power distribution, the environment, and public health: a state-level analysis. Ecol. Econ. 29:1 (1999), 127–140.
17. Broberg, T., Relative income and the WTP for public goods–a case study of forest conservation in Sweden. CERE Working Paper 2014, 2014, 6.
18. Butchart, S., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A.J., Scharlemann, E. Almond, Watson, R., Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:5982 (2010), 1164–1168.
19. Cai, B., Cameron, T.A., Gerdes, G.R., Distributional preferences and the incidence of costs and benefits in climate change policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:4 (2010), 429–458.
20. Chiroleu-Assouline, M., Fodha, M., From regressive pollution taxes to progressive environmental tax reforms. Eur. Econ. Rev. 69 (2014), 126–142.
21. Corbera, E., Valuing nature, paying for environmental goods and realizing social justice: a response to Matulis (2014). Ecol. Econ. 110 (2015), 154–157.
22. Costanza, R., What is ecological economics?. Ecol. Econ. 1:1 (1989), 1–7.
23. Defra, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. An Introductory Guide to Valuing Environmental Goods, 2007, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London.
24. DellaVigna, S., Psychology and economics: evidence from the field. J. Econ. Lit. 47:2 (2009), 315–372.
25. Dietz, S., Hepburn, C., Benefit–cost analysis of non-marginal climate and energy projects. Energy Econ. 40 (2013), 61–71.
26. Drupp, M.A., Limits to substitution between environmental goods and manufactured goods and implications for social discounting. Environ. Resour. Econ. 69:1 (2018), 135–158.
27. Drupp, M.A., Hänsel, M.C., Relative prices and climate policy: how the scarcity of non-market goods drives policy evaluation. Kiel Economics Working Paper No 2018-01, 2018.
28. Ebert, U., Environmental goods and the distribution of income. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25:4 (2003), 435–459.
29. Emmerling, J., Discounting and intragenerational equity. Environ. Dev. Econ. 23:1 (2018), 19–36.
30. Emmerling, J., Groom, B., Wettingfeld, T., Discounting and the representative median agent. Econ. Lett. 161 (2017), 78–81.
31. Fleurbaey, M., Abi-Rafeh, R., The use of distributional weights in benefit–cost analysis: insights from welfare economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:2 (2016), 286–307.
32. Flores, N.E., Carson, R.T., The relationship between the income elasticities of demand and willingness to pay. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 33:3 (1997), 287–295.
33. Frank, E.G., Schlenker, W., Balancing economic and ecological goals. Science 353:6300 (2016), 651–652.
34. Freeman, A.M. III, The measurement of environmental and resource values. Theory and methods. second edition, (eds.) Resources for the Future, Washington D.C, 2003.
35. Frondel, M., Sommer, S., Vance, C., The burden of Germany's energy transition: an empirical analysis of distributional effects. Econ. Anal. Policy 45 (2015), 89–99.
36. Fullerton, D., Six distributional effects of environmental policy. Risk Anal. 31:6 (2011), 923–929.
37. Fullerton, D., Muehlegger, E., Who bears the economic costs of environmental regulations?. NBER Working Paper No. 23677, 2017.
38. Gollier, C., Ecological discounting. J. Econ. Theory 145 (2010), 812–829.
39. Gollier, C., Discounting, inequality and economic convergence. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 69 (2015), 53–61.
40. Grainger, C.A., Kolstad, C.D., Who pays a price on carbon?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:3 (2010), 359–376.
41. Haan, P., Simmler, M., Wind electricity subsidies – a windfall for landowners? Evidence from a feed-in tariff in Germany. J. Public Econ. 159 (2018), 16–32.
42. Heal, G., Kriström, B., Distribution, sustainability and environmental policy. Atkinson, G., Dietz, S., Neumayer, E., (eds.) Handbook of Sustainable Development, 2007, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, USA, 155–170.
43. Heblich, S., Trew, A., Zylberberg, Y., East side story: historical pollution and persistent neighborhood sorting. University of St. Andrews, School of Economics and Finance Discussion Paper No. 1613, 2016.
44. HMT, Her Majesty's Treasury The Green Book. 2011, Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, London TSO (114 pp.).
45. Hoel, M., Sterner, T., Discounting and relative prices. Clim. Chang. 84 (2007), 265–280.
46. IMF, Understanding the downward trend in labor income shares. World Economic Outlook, April 2017: Gaining Momentum?, 2017 http://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WEO/Issues/2017/04/04/world-economic-outlook-april-2017#Chapter%203.
47. Jacobsen, J., Hanley, N., Are there income effects on global willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 43:2 (2009), 137–160.
48. Johansson-Stenman, O., Konow, J., Fair air: distributive justice and environmental economics. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:2 (2010), 147–166.
49. Johansson-Stenman, O., Sterner, T., Discounting and relative consumption. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 71 (2015), 19–33.
50. Klenert, D., Schwerhoff, G., Edenhofer, O., Mattauch, L., Environmental taxation, inequality and Engel's law: the double dividend of redistribution. Environ. Resour. Econ., 2016, 10.1007/s10640-016-0070-y.
51. Kriström, B., Riera, P., Is the income elasticity of environmental improvements less than one?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 7:1 (1996), 45–55.
52. Lee, S., Lin, J., Natural amenities, neighbourhood dynamics, and persistence in the spatial distribution of income. Rev. Econ. Stud. 85 (2018), 663–694.
53. Lienhoop, N., Bartkowski, B., Hansjürgens, B., Informing biodiversity policy: the role of economic valuation, deliberative institutions and deliberative monetary valuation. Environ. Sci. Pol. 54 (2015), 522–532.
54. List, J.A., Behavioral economics and the environment. Keynote Lecture at the 19th Annual International BIOECON Conference, Tilburg, 22.09.2017, 2017.
55. Mäler, K.-G., Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry. 1974, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
56. Matulis, B.S., The economic valuation of nature: a question of justice?. Ecol. Econ. 104 (2014), 155–157.
57. Matulis, B.S., Valuing nature: a reply to Esteve Corbera. Ecol. Econ. 110 (2015), 158–160.
58. MEA, Millennium ecosystem assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. 2005, World Resources Institute, Washington, DC.
59. Meya, J.N., Drupp, M.A., Hanley, N., Income inequality and the international transfer of environmental values. Kiel Economics Working Paper No 2017-03, 2017.
60. OECD, Income inequality remains high in the face of weak recovery. https://www.oecd.org/social/OECD2016-Income-Inequality-Update.pdf, 2016.
61. Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R.T., Dessane, E.B., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M.F., Subramanian, S.M., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y.S., Amankwah, E., Asah, S.T., Berry, P., Bilgin, A., Breslow, S.J., Bullock, C., Cáceres, D., Daly-Hassen, H., Figueroa, E., Golden, C.D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., González-Jiménez, D., Houdet, J., Keune, H., Kumar, R., Ma, K., May, P.H., Mead, A., O'Farrell, P., Pandit, R., Pengue, W., Pichis-Madruga, R., Popa, F., Preston, S., Pacheco-Balanza, D., Saarikoski, H., Strassburg, B.B., van den Belt, M., Verma, M., Wickson, F., Yagi, N., Valuing nature's contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26 (2017), 7–16.
62. Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., Mourato, S., Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: recent developments. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2006.
63. Piketty, T., Capital in the Twenty-first Century. 2014, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. University College London, Cambridge, MA.
64. Pimm, S.L., Jenkins, C.N., Abell, R., Brooks, T.M., Gittleman, J.L., Joppa, L.N., Roberts, C.M., Sexton, J.O., The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science, 344(6187), 2014.
65. Richardson, L., Loomis, J., Kroeger, T., Casey, F., The role of benefit transfer in ecosystem service valuation. Ecol. Econ. 115 (2015), 51–58.
66. Samuelson, P.A., The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev. Econ. Stat. 36:4 (1954), 387–389.
67. Schläpfer, F., Contingent valuation: a new perspective. Ecol. Econ. 64:4 (2008), 729–740.
68. Schläpfer, F., Democratic valuation (DV): using majority voting principles to value public services. Ecol. Econ. 122 (2016), 36–42.
69. Spash, C.L., Deliberative monetary valuation (DMV): issues in combining economic and political processes to value environmental change. Ecol. Econ. 63:4 (2007), 690–699.
70. Sterner, T., Persson, U.M., An even sterner review: introducing relative prices into the discounting debate. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 2:1 (2008), 61–76.
71. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.P., Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. 2010, Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.
72. Teixidó J.J., Verde, S.F., Is the gasoline tax regressive in the twenty-first century? Taking wealth into account. Ecol. Econ. 138 (2017), 109–125.
73. Traeger, C.P., Sustainability, limited substitutability, and non-constant social discount rates. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 62:2 (2011), 215–228.
74. UBA, Umweltbundesamt Methoden der ökonomischen Bewertung Anhang A der “Methodenkonvention 2.0 zur Schätzung von Umweltkosten”. 2012, Dessau-Roßlau Umweltbundesamt.
75. Vatn, A., An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecol. Econ. 68:8 (2009), 2207–2215.
76. Weikard, H.-P., Zhu, X., Discounting and environmental quality: when should dual rates be used?. Econ. Model. 22 (2005), 868–878.