The changing copyright landscape in academic publishing

Learned Publishing

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 270-275

  Dodds, Francis ^a  

^a Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85045128012     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1157     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson, K. (2017, 17 August). Have we reached an inflection point in online collaboration [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/news/analysis-opinion/have-we-reached-inflection-point-online-collaboration
2. Anonymous. (2016). The state of open data. London, England: Digital Science.
3. Anonymous. (2017a, 21 November). Insight and recommendations for the scholarly publishing community [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/news/insight-and-recommendations-scholarly-publishing-community
4. Bjork, B.-C. (2017). Gold, green and black open access. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 173–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1096/abstract
5. Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2014). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329
6. Borrego, A. (2017). Institutional repositories versus ResearchGate: The depositing habits of Spanish researchers. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1099
7. CGIAR. (2017). CGIAR open access and open data support pack. Retrieved from http://www.cgiar.org/resources/open-access/open-access-support/
8. Collins, E., & Milloy, C. (2016). OAPEN-UK final report: A five-year study into open access monograph publishing in the humanities and social sciences. OAPEN-UK. Retrieved from http://oapen-uk.jiscebooks.org/files/2016/01/OAPEN-UK-final-report.pdf
9. Dodds, F. (2017). The future of academic publishing: Revolution or evolution? [Abstract]. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1109
10. Donohoe, P., Sherman, J., & Mistry, A. (2015). The long road to JATS. Proceedings of the Journal Article Tagging Suite Conference (JATS-Conf). Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK279831/
11. Dylla, F. (2016, 24 March). Article sharing on scholarly collaboration networks [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://libraryconnect.elsevier.com/articles/article-sharing-scholarly-collaboration-networks
12. Elsevier. (2017). Author and user rights. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/55654/AuthorUserRights.pdf See also copyright guidance to authors https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/copyright
13. Fyffe, A., Coate, K., Curry, S., Lawson, S., Moxham, N., & Mørk Røstvik, C. (2017). Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. St Andrews, England: University of St Andrews. Retrieved from https://zenodo.org/record/546100#.WTK4eKP2bIU
14. Gadd, E. (2017, 31 October). Academics and copyright ownership: Ignorant, confused or misled? [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/10/31/guest-post-academics-copyright-ownership-ignorant-confused-misled/
15. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., & Probets, S. (2003). RoMEO studes 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation, 59(3), 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410310698239
16. Harjuniemi, M. (2012). Survey of academic attitudes towards open access and institutional repositories. Jyväskylä, Finland: Jyväskylä University. Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/37729/OA-Survey_Results.pdf;sequence=1
17. Harseim, T., & Goodey, G. (2017, 15 June). How do researchers use social networks and scholarly collaboration networks (SCNs) [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://blogs.nature.com/ofschemesandmemes/2017/06/15/how-do-researchers-use-social-media-and-scholarly-collaboration-networks-scns
18. Jamali, H. R. (2017). Copyright compliance and infringement in ResearchGate full-text journal articles. Scientometrics, 112, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2291-4
19. Jubb, M. (2017). Academic books and their futures: A report to the AHRC and the British Library. London, England. Retrieved from https://academicbookfuture.files.wordpress.com/2017/06/academic-books-and-their-futures_jubb1.pdf
20. Lee, N. (2017, 21 July). A broken model: Transforming scholarly communications [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/interview/broken-model
21. Lizzi, V. (2017). Implementation of JATS at Taylor and Francis. Proceedings of the Journal Article Tagging Suite Conference (JATS-Conf). Bethesda, MD: National Center for Biotechnology Information. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425705/
22. Lovett, J., Rathemacher, A., Boukai, D., & Lang, C. (2017). Institutional repositories and academic social networks: Competition or complement? A study of open access policy compliance versus ResearchGate participation. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 5(1). http://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2183
23. Lyubetskaya, A. (2017, 27 April). What do (and don't) researchers know about data sharing? [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.copyright.com/blog/dont-researchers-know-data-sharing/
24. Matthews, D. (2017, 5 October). Publishers seek removal of millions of papers from ResearcGate [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/publishers-seek-removal-millions-papers-researchgate
25. McCormick, A. (2014). Copyright, fair use and the digital age in academic libraries: A review of the literature. SLIS Student Research Journal, 4(2). Retrieved from http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1171&context=slissrj
26. McKay, M. (2017). How can I share it? Research Information. Retrieved from https://www.researchinformation.info/news/analysis-opinion/how-can-i-share-it
27. McKenzie, L. (2017, 16 June). Biologists debate how to license pre-prints. Nature News and Comments.
28. National Institutes of Health. (2017). NIH Public Access Policy. Retrieved from https://publicaccess.nih.gov/
29. Nature. (2017). Nature's peer review debate. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/
30. Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Abdullah, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Świgoń, M., … Herman, E. (2016). Early career researchers. London, England: Publishing Research Consortium. Retrieved from http://publishingresearchconsortium.com/index.php/137-news-main-menu/ecrs-year-one-key-findings/175-early-career-researchers-year-one-2016-key-findings
31. NISO. (2015). Access and license indicators [NISO RP-22-2015]. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/workrooms/ali/
32. OASPA. (2017, 26 May). Steady growth of articles in fully OA journals using a CC-BY License [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://oaspa.org/steady-growth-fully-oa-journals-ccby-license/
33. Owen, L. (Ed.). (2017). Clark's publishing agreements: A book of precedents (10th ed.). Haywards Heath, England: Bloomsbury Professional. ISBN: 9781784519469. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsburyprofessional.com/uk/clarks-publishing-agreements-9781784519469/
34. Plume, A., & van Weijen, D. (2014). Publish or perish: The rise of the fractional author. Research Trends, 38, 16–18. Retrieved from https://www.researchtrends.com/issue-38-september-2014/publish-or-perish-the-rise-of-the-fractional-author/
35. Poynder, R. (2016). Q&A with CNI's Clifford Lynch: Time to rethink the institutional repository? Retrieved from https://www.richardpoynder.co.uk/Clifford_Lynch.pdf
36. Publishers Association. (2017). Scholarly communications license. Retrieved from https://www.publishers.org.uk/activities/copyright-ip/scholarly-communications-licence/
37. Rapple, C. (2017, 7 April). Updated figures on the scale and nature of researchers’ use of scholarly collaboration networks [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/04/07/updated-figures-scale-nature-researchers-use-scholarly-collaboration-networks/
38. Rowley, L., Johnson, F., Sbaffi, L., Frass, W., & Devine, E. (2017). Academics behaviours and attitudes towards open access publishing in scholarly journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1201–1211. https://doi.org/10.10002/asi.23710
39. Schlosser, M. (2016). Write up! A study of copyright information on library-published journals. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication, 4, eP110. https://doi.org/10.7710/2162-3309.2110
40. SHERPA RoMEO. (2017). RoMEO statistics. Retrieved from http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/index.php
41. Soetendorp, R., Haberman, M., & Smith, S. (2016). University IP policy: Perception and practice. Intellectual Property Awareness Network. Retrieved from http://ipaware.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/IPAN_NUS_University_IP_Policy_16aug16.pdf
42. STM. (2008). STM/PSP/ALSP statement on journal publishing agreements. Retrieved from https://www.stm-assoc.org/2008_03_01_Statement_on_Journal_Publishing_Agreements.pdf
43. STM. (2014). The STM permissions guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2017_06_21_STM_Permissions_Guidelines_2014.pdf
44. STM. (2015). STM consultation on article sharing. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/stm-consultations/scn-consultation-2015/
45. STM. (2017a). Open access licensing: Making open access work. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/copyright-legal-affairs/licensing/open-access-licensing/
46. STM. (2017b). How can I share it? Retrieved from http://www.howcanishareit.com/
47. STM. (2017c). ResearchGate changes its terms of service and IP policy. STM Membership Matters. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/mm/december-1-2017/?utm_source=Master+List&utm_campaign=6550b02fc4-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2017_04_21&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_bc3a89abba-6550b02fc4-94525889#researchgate-changes-its
48. Suber, P. (2013, 21 October). Open access: Six myths to put to rest [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2013/oct/21/open-access-myths-peter-suber-harvard
49. Thomas, A. (2017, October/November). An evolving process. Research Information.
50. Tickell, A. (2017, 27 October). How open and accessible is university research? An update [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/blog/Pages/open-access-university-research-update-2017.aspx
51. Van den Eynden, V., Knight, G., & Vlad, A. (2016). Towards open research: Practices, experiences, barriers and opportunities. London, England: Wellcome Trust. Retrieved from http://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/3332696/1/TowardsOpenResearch.pdf
52. Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512, 126–129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a
53. Ware, M., & Mabe, M. (2015). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The Hague, The Netherlands: STM. Retrieved from http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf
54. Wellcome Trust. (2017). Open access policy. Retrieved from https://wellcome.ac.uk/funding/managing-grant/open-access-policy
55. Wulf, K. (2017, 26 July). Missing the target: The UK scholarly communications licence [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/07/26/missing-target-uk-scholarly-communications-license/