Risk, responsibility and roles redefined: Is counterterrorism a corporate responsibility?

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 403-420

  Petersen, Karen Lund ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044982315     PISSN: 09557571     EISSN: 1474449X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09557570802253633     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Adams, John. 1995. Risk, London: UCL Press.
2. Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm. 2004. “ Supervisionsstaten og den politiske virksomhed [The supervisory state and the political company] ”. In Virksomhedens politisering [The politicisation of the company], Edited by: Frankel, Christian. 231–260. Copenhagen, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
3. Andersen, Niels Åkerstrøm, and Born, Asmund. 2003. “ Shifters ”. In Organiseret kommunikation [Organised communication], Edited by: Højlund, Holger, and Knudsen, Morten. 182–206. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzel.
4. Aradau, Claudia, and van Münster, Rens. 2007. Governing terrorism through risk: taking precautions, (un)knowing the future. European Journal of International Relations, 30 (1): 89–115.
5. Aradau, Claudia, and van Münster, Rens. forthcoming. “ Insuring terrorism, assuring subjects, ensuring normality: the politics of risk after 9/11 ”. In Alternatives Vol. 33, 2
6. Beck, Ulrich. 1999. World risk society, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
7. Berlingske Tidende (2007) ‘Hele samfundet må mobiliseres [All of society must be mobilized]’, 21 May
8. Bernstein, Peter L. 1998. Against the gods, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
9. Bigo, Didier. 2002. “ Reassuring and protecting: internal security implications of French participation in the coalition against terrorism ”. In Critical views of September 11: analyses from around the world, Edited by: Hershberg, Eric, and Moore, Kevin W. 72–94. New York: New Press.
10. Carroll, Archie B. 1999. Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 38 (3): 128–295.
11. Coyle, Geoff. 2003. “ Scenario thinking and strategic modeling ”. In The Oxford handbook on strategy: a strategy overview and competitive strategy, Edited by: Faulkner, David O., and Campbell, Andrew. volume 1, 308–348. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
12. Dean, Mitchell. 1998. Risk, calculable and incalculable. Soziale Welt, 49: 25–42.
13. Dean, Mitchell. 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern society, London: Sage.
14. Easton, David. 1960. The political system, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
15. Ericson, Richard, and Doyle, Aaron. 2003. “ Risk and morality ”. In Risk and morality, Edited by: Ericson, Richard, and Doyle, Aaron. 1–10. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
16. Ericson, Richard, and Doyle, Aaron. 2004a. Uncertain business: risk, insurance and the limits of knowledge, Toronto, Canada: Toronto University Press.
17. Ericson, Richard, and Doyle, Aaron. 2004b. Catastrophe risk, insurance and terrorism. Economy and Society, 33 (2): 135–173.
18. Ewald, Francois. 1991. “ Insurance and risk ”. In The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality, Edited by: Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. 197–210. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Ewald, Francois. 2002. “ The return of Descartes's malicious demon: an outline of a philosophy of precaution ”. In Embracing risk, Edited by: Baker, Tom, and Simon, Jonathan. 273–302. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2004. Report to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States: the FBI's counterterrorism program since September 2002, Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation.
21. Foucault, Michel. 1991. “ Governmentality ”. In The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality, Edited by: Burchell, Graham, Gordon, Colin, and Miller, Peter. 87–104. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Frankel, Christian. 2004. “ Indledning ”. In Virksomhedens politisering, Edited by: Frankel, Christian. 9–28. Copenhagen, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
23. Freeman, R Edward. 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach, Boston, Massachusetts: Pitman.
24. Freidman, Milton. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, 13 September
25. Garland, David. 2001. The culture of control, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Garriga, Elisabet, and Melé, Domènec. 2004. Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53: 51–71.
27. Giddens, Anthony. 2002. Runaway world: how globalisation is reshaping our lives, London: Profile Books.
28. Green, Robert. 1972. Political instability as a determinant of US foreign investment, Austin, Texas: Bureau of Business Research, University of Austin.
29. Gubrium, Jaber F, and Holstein, James A. 1995. The active interview, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
30. Gubrium, Jaber F, and Holstein, James A. 1997. The new language of qualitative method, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Hackings, Ian. 2003. “ Risk and dirt ”. In Risk and morality, Edited by: Ericson, Richard, and Doyle, Aaron. 22–47. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
32. Halibozek, Edward, Jones, Andy, and Kovacich, Garald L. 2008. The corporate security professional's handbook on terrorism, Oxford, UK: Elsevier Inc.
33. Hashmin, M Anaam, and Guvenli, Turgut. 1992. Importance of political risk assessment function in US multinational corporations. Global Finance Journal, 3 (2): 137–144.
34. Haufler, Virginia. 1999. “ Self-regulation and business norms: political risk, political activism ”. In Private authority and international affairs, Edited by: Cutler, Claire, Haufler, Virginia, and Porter, Tony. 199–222. New York: State University of New York Press.
35. Hont, Istvan. 2005. Jealousy of trade: international competition and the nation-state in historical perspective, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
36. Jarvis, Darryl (2004) ‘International relations and international risk: method and technique in political risk analysis’, Paper presented at the ISA convention, Montreal, Canada
37. Järvinen, Margareta. 2005. “ Interview i en interaktionistisk begrebsramme ”. In Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv, Edited by: Järvinen, Margareta, and Mik-Meyer, Nanna. 27–48. Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
38. Järvinen, Margareta, and Mik-Meyer, Nanna, eds. 2005. Kvalitative metoder i et interaktionistisk perspektiv, Copenhagen, Denmark: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
39. Koselleck, Reinhart. 1985. Futures past, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
40. Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The practice of conceptual history: timing history, spacing concepts, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
41. Krobin, Stephen. 1979. Political risk: a review and reconsideration. Journal of International Business Studies, 10 (1): 67–80.
42. Leander, Anna. 2005. The power to construct international security: on the significance of private military companies. Millennium, 33 (2): 803–826.
43. Lewis, John E (2005) ‘Remarks to the 4th annual conference on Public Safety: Technology and Counterterrorism, Counterterrorism Initiatives and Partnerships’, San Francisco, 14 March
44. Lloyds. 2007. Under attack? Global business and the threat of political violence, London: Economic Intelligence Unit.
45. Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Essays on self-reference, New York: Columbia University Press.
46. Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Risk: a sociological theory, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
47. Luhmann, Niklas. 2002. Theories of distinction: redescribing the descriptions of modernity, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
48. Morgenthau, Hans J. 1948. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace, New York: Alfred A Knopf.
49. Morsing, Mette, and Thyssen, Christina, eds. 2003. Corporate values and responsibility: the case of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark: Samfundslitteratur.
50. Pedersen, Ove Kaj. 1994. Demokratiets lette tilstand—syv beslutningstagere om Denmark og fremtid [The easy condition of democracy—seven decision-makers on Denmark and future], Copenhagen, Denmark: Spectrum.
51. PET/Danish Security Intelligence (2003) Årsrapport [Annual Report] (Cophenhagen: The Danish Security Intelligence Service)
52. Petersen, Karen Lund. 2007. “ Private enterprise and the risk of terrorism ”. In Terrorism: global economic impacts, Edited by: Mrudula, E. 137–158. Panjagutta, India: ICFAI University Press.
53. Petersen, Karen Lund (2008) ‘Terrorism: corporate risk and national security (re)defined’ (PhD Dissertation No 2/2008, University of Copenhagen, Denmark)
54. Petersen, Karen Lund. forthcoming. “ Terrorism: when risk meets security ”. In Alternatives Vol. 33, 174–192. 2
55. Porter, Michael E, and Kramer, Mark R. 2006. Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review,: 1–14. December
56. Power, Michael. 2003. “ Risk management and the responsible business ”. In Risk and morality, Edited by: Ericson, Richard, and Doyle, Aaron. 145–164. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
57. Rasmussen, Mikkel. 2006. The risk society at war: terror, technology and strategy in the twenty-first century, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
58. Richter, Melvin. 1990. Reconstructing the history of political languages: Pocock, Skinner, and the geschichtliche grundbegriffe. History and Theory, XXIX: 38–70.
59. Richter, Melvin. 1995. The history of political and social concepts, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
60. Salter, Mark B. 2008. Imagining numbers: risk, quantification, and aviation security. Security Dialogue, 39 (2–3): 243–266.
61. Skinner, Quentin. 2002. Visions of politics, volume I, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Spence, Keith. 2005. World risk society and war against terrorism. Political Studies, 53 (2): 284–302.
63. Teubner, Gunther. 1991. “ Autopoiesis and steering: how politics profit from the normative surplus of capital ”. In Autopoiesis and configuration theory: new approaches to societal steering, Edited by: 'tVeld, RJ, Termeer, CJ, Schaap, L, and van Twist, MJW. 127–142. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
64. Tully, James. 1988. “ Introduction ”. In Meaning and context, Edited by: Tully, James. 7–25. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
65. Wæver, Ole. 1998. The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization, 52 (4): 687–727.
66. Wæver, Ole (2002) ‘Security: a conceptual history for international relations’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British International Studies Association in London, 16–18 December
67. Walt, Stephen M. 1991. The renaissance of security studies. International Studies Quarterly, 35 (2): 211–239.
68. Weldes, Jutta. 1996. Constructing national interests. European Journal of International Affairs, 2 (3): 275–318.
69. Weston, Fred V, and Sorge, Bart W. 1972. International managerial finance, Homewood, Illinois: Richard D Irwin.
70. Williams, Michael. 2005. Revisiting established doctrine in an age of risk. The RUSI Journal, 150 (5): 48–52.
71. Wolf, Klaus Dieter, Deitelhoff, Nicole, and Engert, Stefan. 2007. Corporate security responsibility: towards a conceptual framework for a comparative research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict, 42 (3): 294–320.
72. Wolfers, Arnold. 1952. National security as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly, LXCII (4): 481–502.
73. Zarkada-Fraser, Anna, and Fraser, Campbell. 2002. Risk perception of UK firms towards the Russian market. International Journal of Project Management, 20: 99–105.
74. Žižek, Slavoj. 2003. Parallax. London Review of Books, 25 (7): 9