Institutional research misconduct reports need more credibility

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 319, Issue 13, 2018, Pages 1315-1316

  Gunsalus, C K ^a   Marcus, Adam R ^b   Oransky, Ivan ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Center for Integrative Medicine   (United States)

^c NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; CONFIDENTIALITY; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; FUNDING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SCIENTIST; SHORT SURVEY; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES; ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION; PERSONNEL; STANDARDS; UNIVERSITY;

ACADEMIES AND INSTITUTES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 85044940382     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.0358     Document Type: Short Survey

References (6)

1. US Dept of Health and Human Services (HHS). Public Health Service policies on research misconduct: final rule. Fed Regist. 2005;70(94): 28369-28400.
2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements: A New Framework for Research Universities in the 21st Century; Committee on Science, Technology, and Law; Board on Higher Education andWorkforce; Policy and Global Affairs. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2016.
3. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices: current knowledge and issues. In: Fostering Integrity of Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2017.
4. Institute of Medicine. Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2012:122.
5. Valdesolo P, DeSteno D. Moral hypocrisy: social groups and the flexibility of virtue. Psychol Sci. 2007;18(8):689-690.
6. Davidoff F. Checklists and guidelines: imaging techniques for visualizing what to do. JAMA. 2010; 304(2):206-207. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.972