The limits of interregionalism: The EU and North America

Journal of European Integration

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 327-346

  Aggarwal, Vinod K ^a   Fogarty, Edward A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

counterpart coherence; economic relations; international cooperation; Interregionalism; regionalism; trade policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044888884     PISSN: 07036337     EISSN: 14772280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07036330500190214     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Aggarwal, V., and Fogarty, E., 2004. “ Between Regionalism and Globalism: European Union Interregional Trade Strategies ”. In EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism, Edited by: Aggarwal, V., and Fogarty, E., New York: Palgrave.
2. Aggarwal, V., and Morrison, C., eds. 1998. Asia–Pacific Crossroads: Regime Creation and the Future of APEC, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
3. Aggarwal, V., and Ravenhill, J., 2001. How open sectoral agreements undermine the WTO. Asia–Pacific Issues, 50
4. Bhagwati, J. N., and Arvind, P., 1996. “ Preferential trading areas and multilateralism: strangers, friends, or foes? ”. In Free Trade Areas or Free Trade? The Economics of Preferential Trade Agreements, Edited by: Bhagwati, J. N., and Panagariya, A., Washington, DC: AEI Press.
5. Blair, T., 2001. Speech to Canadian Parliament Ottawa 23 February
6. Council of Europe. 2000. Prospects for a new transatlantic trade relationship Report of the Committee on Economic Affairs and Development to the Parliamentary Assembly, 6 June
7. Department of Trade and Industry, United Kingdom (DTI). 2001. World trade and international trade rules: North America available at: http://www.dti.gov.uk/worldtrade/namerica.htm (accessed [date])
8. Deutsch, K., 1957. Political Community: North–Atlantic Area, New York: Greenwood Press.
9. Deutsch, K., 1966. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality, Cambridge: MIT Press.
10. Dupont, C., 2001. “ Euro–pressure: avenues and strategies for lobbying the European Union ”. In Winning in Asia, European Style: Market and Nonmarket Strategies for Success, Edited by: Aggarwal, V., New York: Palgrave.
11. European Commission. 2003. EU–US bilateral economic relations Available at: www.europa.eu.int/comm/external_relations/US/sum06_04/econ.pdf (accessed July 2005)
12. European Commission, DG Trade. 2000. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament accompanying the final text of the draft decisions by the EC–Mexico Joint Council Brussels 18 January
13. Faust, J., 2004. “ Blueprint for an Interregional Future? The European Union and the Southern Cone ”. In EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism, Edited by: Aggarwal, V., and Fogarty, E., New York: Palgrave.
14. Fogarty, E., 2004. “ Be Careful What You Wish For: European Union and North America ”. In EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism, Edited by: Aggarwal, V., and Fogarty, E., New York: Palgrave.
15. Fogarty, E., The dog that barked (did it bite?): the antiglobalisation movement and the multilateral trade regime. paper presented at the ‘Annual Conference of the International Studies Association’. 13 March, Honolulu.
16. Frieden, J., 1991. Invested interests: the politics of national economic policies in a world of global finance. International Organization, 45(4): 425–451.
17. Frieden, J., and Rogowski, R., 1996. “ The impact of the international economy on national policies: an analytical overview ”. In Internationalization and Domestic Politics, Edited by: Keohane, R., and Milner, H., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Gilson, J., 2004. “ Weaving a New Silk Road: Europe Meets Asia ”. In EU Trade Strategies: Between Regionalism and Globalism, Edited by: Aggarwal, V., and Fogarty, E., New York: Palgrave.
19. Gower, M., 2000. Titans of trade: signing free–trade deals with heavyweights like North America and the European Union has placed Mexico on the world stage, American Chamber of Commerce of Mexico. 1 October
20. Greenwood, J., 1997. Representing Interests in the European Union, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
21. Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1996. Electoral competition and special interest politics. Review of Economic Studies, 63: 265–286.
22. Hiscox, M., 2001. Class versus industry cleavages: inter–industry factor mobility and the politics of trade. International Organization, 55(1): 1–46.
23. Inglehart, R., 1988. The Renaissance of political culture. American Political Science Review, 82(4): 1120–1130.
24. Judt, T., 2003. Old Europe, New Europe — US illusions book review on Countercurrents.org, 8 March
25. Kagan, R., 2003. Of Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order, New York: Knopf.
26. Kühnhardt, L., 2003. “ Contrasting Transatlantic Interpretations: The EU and the US Towards a Common Global Role ”. In Occasional Paper 2003:1, Stockholm: SIEPS.
27. Lamy, P., 1999. Speech to Transatlantic Business Dialogue Brussels 23 May
28. Lamy, P., 2000. Speech to Confederation of British Industry London 6 July
29. Manners, I., 2002. Normative power Europe: a contradiction in terms?. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2): 235–258.
30. Manners, I., 2001. The ‘difference engine’: constructing and representing the international identity in the European Union Web paper downloaded from CIAOnet
31. Prodi, R., 2000. Europe As I See It, Cambridge: Polity.
32. Rogowski, R., 1989. Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
33. Sapir, A., 1998. The political economy of EC regionalism. European Economic Review, 42: 717–732.
34. Sbragia, A., 2001. “ European Union and NAFTA ”. In European Union and New Regionalism: Regional Actors and Global Governance in a Post–Hegemonic Era, Edited by: Telò, M., London: Ashgate.
35. Wæver, O., 1998. “ Integration as security: constructing a Europe at peace ”. In Atlantic Security, Edited by: Kupchan, C., New York: Council on Foreign Relations.