Low Rates of Gastrointestinal and Non-Gastrointestinal Complications for Screening or Surveillance Colonoscopies in a Population-Based Study

Gastroenterology

Volumn 154, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 540-555.e8

  Wang, Louise ^a   Mannalithara, Ajitha ^b   Singh, Gurkirpal ^b,c   Ladabaum, Uri ^b  

^a HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Institute of Clinical Outcomes Research and Education   (United States)

Author keywords

Adverse Events; Cardiovascular; Colorectal; Population based; Pulmonary

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROSCOPY; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION; BLACK PERSON; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; CATARACT; COLONOSCOPY; COMORBIDITY; DATA BASE; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM PERFORATION; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LITHOTRIPSY; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AGE; BIOPSY; CALIFORNIA; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE; FACTUAL DATABASE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITALIZATION; LUNG DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOPSY; CALIFORNIA; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COLONOSCOPY; COMMUNICABLE DISEASES; COMORBIDITY; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASES; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; LUNG DISEASES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 85044845412     PISSN: 00165085     EISSN: 15280012     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.006     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Peery, A.F., Dellon, E.S., Lund, J., et al. Burden of gastrointestinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. Gastroenterology 143 (2012), 1179–1187 e1–e3.
2. Seeff, L.C., Richards, T.B., Shapiro, J.A., et al. How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity. Gastroenterology 127 (2004), 1670–1677.
3. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care, Bacchus, C.M., Dunfield, L., et al. Recommendations on screening for colorectal cancer in primary care. CMAJ 188 (2016), 340–348.
4. Zauber, A.G., Knudsen, A.B., Rutter, C.M., et al. Evaluating the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening strategies: a collaborative modeling approach. AHRQ 14 (2015), 1–122.
5. Lin, J., Piper, M., Perdue, L., et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review for the USPSTF. AHRQ 14 (2015), 1–240.
6. HCUP quality control procedures. 2017. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/quality.pdf. (Accessed May 15, 2017).
7. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Introduction to the HCUP State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases (SASD). 2017. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/sasddist/Introduction_to_SASD.pdf. (Accessed May 15, 2017).
8. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Introduction to the HCUP State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD). 2017. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/sedddist/Introduction_to_SEDD.pdf. (Accessed May 15, 2017).
9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Introduction to the HCUP State Inpatient Databases (SID). 2017. Available at: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/siddist/Introduction_to_SID.pdf. (Accessed May 15, 2017).
10. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUP supplemental variables for revisit analyses. Available at: https://hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/revisit/revisit.jsp. (Accessed May 15, 2017).
11. Ladabaum, U., Levin, Z., Mannalithara, A., et al. Colorectal testing utilization and payments in a large cohort of commercially insured US adults. Am J Gastroenterol 109 (2014), 1513–1525.
12. Ko, C.W., Dominitz, J.A., Complications of colonoscopy: magnitude and management. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 20 (2010), 659–671.
13. Arora, G., Mannalithara, A., Singh, G., et al. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009), 654–664.
14. Sporn, E., Petroski, G.F., Mancini, G.J., et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy–is it worth the cost? Trend analysis in the US from 2000 to 2005. J Am Coll Surg 208 (2009), 179–185.e2.
15. Kreder, H.J., Deyo, R.A., Koepsell, T., et al. Relationship between the volume of total hip replacements performed by providers and the rates of postoperative complications in the state of Washington. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 (1997), 485–494.
16. Deyo, R.A., Cherkin, D.C., Ciol, M.A., Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45 (1992), 613–619.
17. Reumkens, A., Rondagh, E.J.A., Bakker, C.M., et al. Post-colonoscopy complications: a systematic review, time trends, and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Am J Gastroenterol 111 (2016), 1092–1101.
18. Ko, C.W., Riffle, S., Michaels, L., et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 8 (2010), 166–173.
19. Warren, J.L., Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Ann Intern Med, 150, 2009 849–810.
20. Rabeneck, L., Paszat, L.F., Hilsden, R.J., et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 135 (2008), 1899–1906.e1.
21. Levin, T.R., Zhao, W., Conell, C., et al. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med 145 (2006), 880–889.
22. Basson, M.D., Etter, L., Panzini, L.A., Rates of colonoscopic perforation in current practice. Gastroenterology, 114, 1998, 1115.
23. Kang, H.Y., Kang, H.W., Kim, S.G., et al. Incidence and management of colonoscopic perforations in Korea. Digestion 78 (2008), 218–223.
24. Polter, D.E., Risk of colon perforation during colonoscopy at Baylor University Medical Center. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 28 (2015), 3–6.
25. Lippert, E., Herfarth, H.H., Grunert, N., et al. Gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients aged 75 years and older: risks, complications, and findings—a retrospective study. Int J Colorectal Dis 30 (2015), 363–366.
26. Kahi, C.J., Azzouz, F., Juliar, B.E., et al. Survival of elderly persons undergoing colonoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 66 (2007), 544–550.
27. Rathgaber, S.W., Wick, T.M., Colonoscopy completion and complication rates in a community gastroenterology practice. Gastrointest Endosc 64 (2006), 556–562.
28. Zubarik, R., Fleischer, D., Mastropietro, C., et al. Prospective analysis of complications 30 days after outpatient colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 50 (1999), 1–7.
29. Lüning, T.H., Keemers-Gels, M.E., Barendregt, W.B., et al. Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc 21 (2007), 994–997.
30. Eckardt, V.F., Kanzler, G., Schmitt, T., et al. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointest Endosc 49 (1999), 560–565.
31. Sieg, A., Hachmoeller-Eisenbach, U., Eisenbach, T., Prospective evaluation of complications in outpatient GI endoscopy: a survey among German gastroenterologists. Gastrointest Endosc 53 (2001), 620–627.
32. Nelson, D.B., McQuaid, K.R., Bond, J.H., Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55 (2002), 307–314.
33. Viiala, C.H., Zimmerman, M., Cullen, D.J.E., et al. Complication rates of colonoscopy in an Australian teaching hospital environment. Intern Med J 33 (2003), 355–359.
34. Geenen, J.E., Schmitt, M.G., Wu, W.C., et al. Major complications of coloscopy: bleeding and perforation. Am J Dig Dis 20 (1975), 231–235.
35. Farley, D.R., Bannon, M.P., Zietlow, S.P., et al. Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clinic Proc 72 (1997), 729–733.
36. Anderson, M.L., Pasha, T.M., Leighton, J.A., Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 95 (2000), 3418–3422.
37. Chukmaitov, A., Bradley, C.J., Dahman, B., et al. Association of polypectomy techniques, endoscopist volume, and facility type with colonoscopy complications. Gastrointest Endosc 77 (2013), 436–446.
38. Bielawska, B., Day, A.G., Lieberman, D.A., et al. Risk factors for early colonoscopic perforation include non-gastroenterologist endoscopists: a multivariable analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12 (2014), 85–92.
39. Singh, H., Penfold, R.B., DeCoster, C., et al. Colonoscopy and its complications across a Canadian regional health authority. Gastrointest Endosc 69 (2009), 665–671.
40. Adeyemo, A., Bannazadeh, M., Riggs, T., et al. Does sedation type affect colonoscopy perforation rates?. Dis Colon Rectum 57 (2014), 110–114.
41. Blotière, P.-O., Weill, A., Ricordeau, P., et al. Perforations and haemorrhages after colonoscopy in 2010: a study based on comprehensive French health insurance data (SNIIRAM). Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 38 (2014), 112–117.
42. Cooper, G.S., Kou, T.D., Rex, D.K., Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance: a population-based analysis. JAMA Intern Med 173 (2013), 551–556.
43. Dominitz, J.A., Baldwin, L.M., Green, P., et al. Regional variation in anesthesia assistance during outpatient colonoscopy is not associated with differences in polyp detection or complication rates. Gastroenterology 144 (2013), 298–306.
44. Hamdani, U., Risk factors for colonoscopic perforation: a population-based study of 80118 cases. World J Gastroenterol, 19, 2013 3596–3596.
45. Stock, C., Ihle, P., Sieg, A., et al. Adverse events requiring hospitalization within 30 days after outpatient screening and nonscreening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 77 (2013), 419–429.
46. Quintero, E., Castells, A., Bujanda, L., et al. Colonoscopy versus fecal immunochemical testing in colorectal-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 366 (2012), 697–706.
47. Mozaffarian, D., Benjamin, E.J., Go, A.S., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 131 (2015), e29–e322.
48. Rutter, C.M., Johnson, E., Miglioretti, D.L., et al. Adverse events after screening and follow-up colonoscopy. Cancer Causes Control 23 (2011), 289–296.
49. Ranasinghe, I., Parzynski, C.S., Searfoss, R., et al. Differences in colonoscopy quality among facilities: development of a post-colonoscopy risk-standardized rate of unplanned hospital visits. Gastroenterology 150 (2016), 103–113.
50. Holt, C.L., Shipp, M., Eloubeidi, M., et al. Use of focus group data to develop recommendations for demographically segmented colorectal cancer educational strategies. Health Educ Res 24 (2009), 876–889.
51. Wilkins, T., Gillies, R.A., Harbuck, S., et al. Racial disparities and barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural areas. J Am Board Fam Med 25 (2012), 308–317.
52. Bromley, E.G., May, F.P., Federer, L., et al. Explaining persistent under-use of colonoscopic cancer screening in African Americans: a systematic review. Prev Med 71 (2015), 40–48.
53. James, A.S., Daley, C.M., Greiner, K.A., Knowledge and attitudes about colon cancer screening among African Americans. Am J Health Behav 35 (2011), 393–401.
54. Siegel, R., DeSantis, C., Jemal, A., Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64 (2014), 104–117.
55. Almario, C.V., May, F.P., Ponce, N.A., et al. Racial and ethnic disparities in colonoscopic examination of individuals with a family history of colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 13 (2015), 1487–1495.
56. Laiyemo, A.O., Thompson, N., Williams, C.D., et al. Race and colorectal cancer screening compliance among persons with a family history of cancer. World J Gastrointest Endosc 7 (2015), 1300–1305.
57. Decker, K.M., Demers, A.A., Nugent, Z., et al. Longitudinal rates of colon cancer screening use in Winnipeg, Canada: the experience of a universal health-care system with an organized colon screening program. Am J Gastroenterol 110 (2015), 1640–1646.
58. O'Malley, A.S., Forrest, C.B., Feng, S., et al. Disparities despite coverage: gaps in colorectal cancer screening among Medicare beneficiaries. Arch Intern Med 165 (2005), 2129–2135.
59. May, F.P., Bromley, E.G., Reid, M.W., et al. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans in an integrated Veterans Affairs health care network. Gastrointest Endosc 80 (2014), 291–298.
60. Haddad, J.D., You, D.M., Colorectal cancer screening and race in an equal access medical system. J Community Health 41 (2016), 78–81.
61. Gatto, N.M., Frucht, H., Sundararajan, V., et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95 (2003), 230–236.
62. Zafar, H.M., Harhay, M.O., Yang, J., et al. Adverse events following computed tomographic colonography compared to optical colonoscopy in the elderly. Prev Med Rep 1 (2014), 3–8.
63. Hsieh, T.K., Hung, L., Kang, F.C., et al. Anesthesia does not increase the rate of bowel perforation during colonoscopy: a retrospective study. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan 47 (2009), 162–166.
64. Kamath, A.S., Iqbal, C.W., Sarr, M.G., et al. Colonoscopic splenic injuries: incidence and management. J Gastrointest Surg 13 (2009), 2136–2140.
65. Tam, M.S., Abbas, M.A., Perforation following colorectal endoscopy: what happens beyond the endoscopy suite?. Perm J 17 (2013), 17–21.
66. Pox, C.P., Altenhofen, L., Brenner, H., et al. Efficacy of a nationwide screening colonoscopy program for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 142 (2012), 1460–1467.e2.
67. Korman, L.Y., Overholt, B.F., Box, T., et al. Perforation during colonoscopy in endoscopic ambulatory surgical centers. Gastrointest Endosc 58 (2003), 554–557.
68. Wernli, K.J., Brenner, A.T., Rutter, C.M., et al. Risks associated with anesthesia services during colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 150 (2016), 888–894.
69. Bretthauer, M., Kaminski, M.F., Løberg, M., et al. Population-based colonoscopy screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med 176 (2016), 894–902.
70. Chen, S.C., Rex, D.K., Endoscopist can be more powerful than age and male gender in predicting adenoma detection at colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 102 (2007), 856–861.
71. Layton, J.B., Klemmer, P.J., Christiansen, C.F., et al. Sodium phosphate does not increase risk for acute kidney injury after routine colonoscopy, compared with polyethylene glycol. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 12 (2014), 1514–1521.e3.