Imagined technology futures in demand-oriented technology assessment

Journal of Responsible Innovation

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 177-196

  Decker, Michael ^a   Weinberger, Nora ^a   Krings, Bettina Johanna ^a   Hirsch, Johannes ^a  

^a KARLSRUHE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anticipation; demand pull; dementia; envisioning; grand challenges

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044825861     PISSN: 23299460     EISSN: 23299037     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1360720     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bieber, D., and K., Schwarz, eds. 2011. Mit AAL-Dienstleistungen altern. Nutzerbedarfsanalysen im Kontext des Ambient Assisted Living. iso-Institut: Saarbrücken.
2. Blackman, S., C., Matlo, C., Bobrovitskiy, A., Waldoch, M. L., Fang, P., Jackson, A., Mihailidis, L., Nygård, A., Astell, and A., Sixsmith. 2016. “Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review.” Journal of Intelligent Systems 25 (1): 364–369. doi: 10.1515/jisys-2014-0136
3. BMG (Bundesministerium für Gesundheit). 2013. Unterstützung Pflegebedürftiger durch technische Assistenzsysteme. Abschlussbericht: Berlin.
4. Calvaresi, D., D., Cesarini, P., Sernani, M., Marinoni, A. F., Dragoni, and A., Sturm. 2017. “Exploring the Ambient Assisted Living Domain: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing 8: 239–257. doi: 10.1007/s12652-016-0374-3
5. Cuhls, K., 2003. “From Forecasting to Foresight Processes–New Participative Foresight Activities in Germany.” Journal of Forecasting 22 (2/3): 93–111. doi: 10.1002/for.848
6. De Hoop, E., A., Pols, and H., Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396
7. Ferri, C., M., Prince, C., Brayne, H., Brodaty, L., Fratiglioni, M., Ganguli, K., Hall, et al. 2005. “Global Prevalence of Dementia: A Delphi Consensus Study.” Lancet 366: 2112–2117. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67889-0
8. Fisher, E., and R. L., Mahajan. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Nanotechnology Research in an Academic Laboratory.” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME).
9. Flipse, S. M., and S., Puylaert. 2017. “Organizing a Collaborative Development of Technological Design Requirements Using a Constructive Dialogue on Value Profiles: A Case in Automated Vehicle Development.” Science and Engineering Ethics: 1–24.
10. Friedman, B., P., Kahn, and A., Borning. 2002. “Value Sensitive Design: Theory and Methods.” University of Washington Technical Report, 02–12.
11. Geels, F. W., 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33: 897–920. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
12. Geyer, J., 2015. “Einkommen und Vermögen der Pflegehaushalte in Deutschland.” DIW-Wochenbericht 82 (14/15): 323–328.
13. Grunwald, A., 2011. “Responsible Innovation: Bringing Together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS Research.” Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies 7: 9–31.
14. Guston, D. H., E., Fisher, A., Grunwald, R., Owen, T., Swierstra, and S., van der Burg. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: Motivations for a New Journal.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 1–8. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.885175
15. Guston, D. H., and D., Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (1): 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
16. Hmida, H. B., and A., Braun. 2017. “Enabling an Internet of Things Framework for Ambient Assisted Living.” In Ambient Assisted Living, edited by R., Wichert and B., Mand, 181–196. Switzerland: Springer International.
17. Krings, B.-J., K., Böhle, M., Decker, L., Nierling, and C., Schneider. 2014. “ITA-Monitoring ‘Serviceroboter in Pflegearrangements’.” In Zukünftige Themen der Innovations- und Technikanalyse. Lessons Learned und ausgewählte Ergebnisse, KIT Scientific Reports, edited by M., Decker, T., Fleischer, J., Schippl, and N., Weinberger, 63–122. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific.
18. Litz, F. T., 2008. Toward a Constructive Dialogue on Federal and State Roles in US Climate Change Policy. Arlington, VA.
19. Moschetti, A., L., Fiorini, M., Aquilano, F., Cavallo, and P., Dario. 2014. “Preliminary Findings of the AALIANCE2 Ambient Assisted Living Roadmap.” In Ambient Assisted Living, edited by S., Longhi, P., Siciliano, M., Germani, and A., Monteriu, 335–342. Switzerland: Springer International.
20. Owen, R., P., Macnaghten, and J., Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093
21. Prince, M., E., Albanese, M., Guerchet, and M., Prina. 2014. Dementia and Risk Reduction. An Analysis of Protective and Modifiable Factors. World Alzheimer Report 2014. Alzheimer’s Disease International.
22. Rip, A., T. J., Misa, and J., Schot, eds. 1995. Managing Technology in Society. The Approach of Constructive Technology Assessment. New York: Pinter.
23. Rip, A., and H., Te Kulve. 2008. “Constructive Technology Assessment and Socio-technical Scenarios.” In Presenting Futures, edited by E. Fisher, C. Selin, and J. M. Wetmore, The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, Vol. 1, 49–70. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
24. Schot, J., and A., Rip. 1997. “The Past and Future of Constructive Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 54 (2/3): 251–268. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00180-1
25. Stahl, B. C., 2011. Pathways Towards Responsible ICT Innovation. Policy brief of STOA on the ETICA project. Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Report. Publication Office of the European Parliament.
26. Stahl, B., M., Jirotka, and G., Eden. 2013. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs.” In Responsible Innovation, 1st ed., edited by R., Owen, M., Heintz, and J., Bessant, 199–218. London: John Wiley.
27. Stilgoe, J., R., Owen, and P., Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
28. von Schomberg, R., ed. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. Accessed August 31, 2016. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/mep-rapport-2011_en.pdf.
29. von Schomberg, Rene., 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methode, edited by M., Dusseldorp and R., Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: Springer.
30. Weinberger, N., and M., Decker. 2015. “Technische Unterstützung für Menschen mit Demenz? Zur Notwendigkeit einer bedarfsorientierten Technikentwicklung.” Technikfolgenabschätzung–Theorie und Praxis 24 (2): 36–45.