A critical discourse analysis of the special education referral process: A case study

Discourse

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 139-158

  Rogers, Rebecca ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044813355     PISSN: 01596306     EISSN: 14693739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01596300303040     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. ALLAN, J., EROWN, S., and RIDDELL, S., 1998. “ Permission to speak? Theorizing special education inside the classroom ”. In Theorising Special Education, Edited by: CLARK, C., DYSON, A., and MILLWARD, A., New York: Routledge.
2. ALLINGTON, R., and MC GILL-FRANZEN, A., 1995. “ Placing children at riak: schools respond to reading problems ”. In At-Risk Students: portraits, policies, programs and practices, Edited by: DONMOYER, R., and KOS, R., New York: State University of New York Press.
3. BAlLEY, J., 1998. “ Medical and psychologial models in special needs education ”. In Theorising Special Education, Edited by: CLARK, C., DYSON, A., and MILLWARD, A. A., New York: Routledge.
4. BAKHTIN, M., 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: four essays by M.M. Bokktin, Edited by: Holquist, M., Emerson, C., and Holquist, M., Austin: University of Texas Press.
5. BARTON, D., and HAMILTON, M., 1998. Local Literacies: reading and writing in one community, London: Routledge.
6. BLOOME, D., KATZ, L., SOLSKEN, J., WILLETT, J., and WILSON-KEENAN, J., 2000. Interpellations of family/community and classroom literacy practices. Journal of Educational Research, 93(3): 155–163.
7. CHOULIAKAKI, L., and FAIRCILOUGH, N., 1999. Discovers in Lata Modernity: rethinking critical discovers analysis, Edinburgs: Edinburgh Uiversity Press.
8. COLES, G., 1987. The Learning Mystique a critical look at 'Learning disabilities', New York: Pantheon.
9. COLLINS, J., 1993. “ Determination and contradiction: an appreciation and critique of the work of Pierre Bourdieu on language and education ”. In Botadia: critical porspections, Edited by: CALHOUN, C., LIPUMA, E., and POSTONE, M., New York: Policy Free.
10. COLUNS, J., 1996. “ Socialization to text structure and contradiction in scgiiked literacy ”. In Natural Historiesof Discovers, Edited by: SILVERSTEIN, M., and URBAN, G., Chicago: Univeersity of Chicago Press.
11. COLLINS, J., 2000. Benstein, Boundieu and the new literacy studies. Linguistics abd Education, 10(4): 1–8.
12. COLLINS, J., 2001. Selling the market educational standards, disourse, and social inequality. Critiques of Anthropology, 21(2): 143–164.
13. COOK-GUMPERZ, J., 1986. Tin Social Constractions of Literacy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. FAIRCLOUGH, N., 1989. Languages and Foam, London: Longman.
15. FAIRCLOUGH, N., 1992. Discern ami Social Charge, Cambridge: Polity Press.
16. FAIRCLOUGH, N., 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: the critical study of language, New York: Longman.
17. FOUCAULT, N., 1977. Disciplins ad Punish: the birth of the prison, New York: Random Home.
18. FOUCAULT, N., 1984. “ The order of discourse ”. In Languages and Politics, Edited by: SHAPIRO, M., Oxford: Blackwell.
19. GARTNER, A., and KERNZER-LIPSKY, D., 1987. Beyond special education: toward a quality system for all students. Homard Educational Review, 57(4): 367–395.
20. GEE, J., 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies: ideology in discourses, London: Palmer Press.
21. GEE, J., 1999. An Introduction to Discourses Analysis, New York: Routledge.
22. GEE, J., 2000. “ New people in new worlds: networks, the new capitalism, and schools ”. In Multiliteracies. learning and the design of social futures, Edited by: COPE, B., and KALANTZIS, M., New York: Routledge.
23. HALUDAY, M., 1978. Languages as Social Somatic: the social interpretation of languages and meaning, Baltimore: University Park Press.
24. HEATH, S.B., 1983. Ways with Words: language, life and work in community and classrooms, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. HODGE, R., and KRESS, G., 1979. Languages as Ideologu, London: Routledge.
26. HOLQUIST, M., 1991. Dialogism: BaKhin and Us world, London: Routledge.
27. JOHNSTON, P., SHANNON, P., MURPHY, S., and HANSON, J., 1998. The role of consequences, in Fragils Evidences: a critique of reading assessment, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
28. KNOBEL, M., 1998. Everyday Literacins. Students, discourse, andsocial practics, New York: Peter Lang.
29. KRAIS, B., 1993. “ Gender and symbolic violence: female oppression in the light of Pierre Bourdieu's theory of social practice ”. In Bourdiew: critical perspectives, Edited by: CALHOUN, C., LIPUMA, E., and POSTONE, M., New York: Policy Press.
30. LAREAU, A., 1988. Home Advantages: social doss and parental intervention in elementary education, New York: Falmer Press.
31. LEWIS, C., KETTER, J., and FABOK, B., 2001. Reading race in a rural context. International Journal of Qualitive Studies n Education, 14(3): 317–350.
32. LUKE, A., 1995/1996. “ Text and disscourse in education: an introduction to critical discourse analysis ”. In Review of Research in Education, Edited by: APPLE, M.W., Washington: American Educational Research Association.
33. McDERMOTT, R., 1987. “ Achieving school failure: an anthropological approach to illiteracy and social startification ”. In Education and Cultural Process, 2nd edn, Edited by: SPLINDLER, G, D., Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
34. McDERMOTT, R., 1996. “ The acquisition of a child by a learning disability ”. In Understanding Practices: Practice perspectives on activity and context, Edited by: CHAKLIN, S., and LAVE, J., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. McGlLL-FRANZEN, A., and ALLINGTON, R., 1991. The gridlock of low-achievement: perspectives on policy and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 12: 20–30.
36. MEHAN, H., 1996. “ The construction of an LD student a CBK study of die politics of representation ”. In Natural Histories of Discourses, Edited by: SILVERSTEIN, M., and URBAN, G., Chicago: University of Chicago press.
37. MEHAN, H., HERTWECK, M.J., and MEIHLS, J.L., 1986. Handicapping the Handicapped: decision making in students' careers, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
38. MURPHY, S., 1997. Literacy assement and the politics of identities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 13: 261–278.
39. NICHOLLS, J.G., 1989. Tin Competitive Ethos and Democratic Education, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. ORELLANA, M., 1999. “ Good guys and "bad' girls: identity construction by latino and latins student writers ”. In Revieventing Identities: the gendered self in discourses, Edited by: BUGHOLTZ, M., LUNG, A., and SUTTON, L., New York: Oxford University Press.
41. PATTON, J., 1998. The disproportionate representation of African Americans in special education: lookingbehind the curtain for understanding and solution. Journal of Special Education, 32(1): 25–31.
42. ROGERS, R., 2002. Between contexts: a critical discourse analysis of family literacy, discursive practices, and Literate subjectivities. Reading Research Quarterly, 37(3): 248–276.
43. ROGERS, R., 2003. A Critical discourse Analysis of Family Literacy Practices: power in and out of print, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44. SGRIENER, S., and COLE, M., 1981. The Psychology of Literacy, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. SILVERSTEIN, M., and URBAN, G., eds. 1996. Natural Histories of Discourse, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. STREET, B., 1993. “ literacy and Linguistics ”. In Literacy in Theory and Practice, Edited by: STREET, B., Cambridge: Cambridge Universtiy press.
47. TAYLOR, D., and DORSEY-GAINES, C., 1988. Growing up Literats: learning from inner city families, Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
48. VOLOSINOV, V., 1973. Marxism ad tin Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univeersity Press.
49. YSSELDYKE, J.E., ALGOZZINE, B., RIGHEY, L., and GRADEN, J., 1984. Declaring students eligible for learning disability services: why bother with the dan?. Learning Disability Qrarterly, 5: 37–42.