Mean Rank, Equipercentile, and Regression Mapping of World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief (WHOQOL-BREF) to EuroQoL 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Utilities

Medical Decision Making

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 319-333

  Wee, Hwee Lin ^a   Yeo, Khung Keong ^b   Chong, Kok Joon ^c   Khoo, Eric Yin Hao ^c   Cheung, Yin Bun ^d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Singapore)

^c Dept Medicine Endocrinol Diabet   (Singapore)

^d DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

health related quality of life; linking values; mapping functions; patient reported outcomes; preference based measures

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTRIBUTION PARAMETERS; EMERGENCY CARE; ERROR; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTPATIENT; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; POPULATION; PREDICTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESIDENT; SIMULATION; SINGAPORE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGAPORE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85044746949     PISSN: 0272989X     EISSN: 1552681X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0272989X18756890     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
2. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of Eq-5d (Eq-5d-5l). Qual Life Res. 2011;20:1727–1736.
3. Brazier J, Roberts J, Deverill M. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the Sf-36. J Health Econ. 2002;21:271–292.
4. Horsman J, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance G. The Health Utilities Index (Hui): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:54.
5. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2013.
6. Fayers PM, Hays RD. Should linking replace regression when mapping from profile-based measures to preference-based measures? Value Health. 2014;17:261–265.
7. Young TA, Mukuria C, Rowen D, Brazier JE, Longworth L. Mapping functions in health-related quality of life: Mapping from two cancer-specific health-related quality-of-life instruments to Eq-5d-3l. Med Decis Making. 2015;35:912–926.
8. Versteegh MM, Leunis A, Luime JJ, Boggild M, Uyl-de Groot CA, Stolk EA. Mapping Qlq-C30, Haq, and Msis-29 on Eq-5d. Med Decis Making. 2012;32:554–568.
9. Brazier JE, Yang Y, Tsuchiya A, Rowen DL. A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measures. Eur J Health Econ. 2010;11:215–225.
10. The Whoqol Group. Development of the World Health Organization Whoqol-Bref quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28:551–558.
11. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (Whoqol): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–1409.
12. Dorans NJ. Linking scores from multiple health outcome instruments. Qual Life Res. 2007;16Suppl 1:85–94.
13. Holland PW, Thayer DT. The Kernel Method of Equating Score Distributions. Educational Testing Service; 1989.
14. Huang IC, Frangakis C, Atkinson MJ. Addressing ceiling effects in health status measures: A comparison of techniques applied to measures for people with HIV disease. Health Serv Res. 2008;43:327–339.
15. Petrou S, Rivero-Arias O, Dakin H. Preferred reporting items for studies mapping onto preference-based outcome measures: The Maps Statement. Med Decis Making. 2015;35:NP1–NP8.
16. World Health Organization Division of Mental Health. Whoqol-Bref: Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the Assessment: Field Trial Version. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
17. van Hout B, Janssen MF, Feng YS. Interim scoring for the Eq-5d-5l: Mapping the Eq-5d-5l to Eq-5d-3l value sets. Value Health. 2012;15:708–715.
18. Tsuchiya A, Ikeda S, Ikegami N. Estimating an Eq-5d population value set: The case of Japan. Health Econ. 2002;11:341–353.
19. Sow WT, Wee HL, Wu Y. Normative data for the Singapore English and Chinese Sf-36 Version 2 health survey. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2014;43:15–23.
20. Van Kerm P. Kernel-smoothed cumulative distribution function estimation with Akdensity. Stata J. 2012;12:543–548.
21. Cowling A, Hall P. On pseudodata methods for removing boundary effects in kernel density estimation. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B. 1996;58:551–563.
22. Hall P, Wehrly TE. A geometrical method for removing edge effects from kernel-type nonparametric regression estimators. J Am Stat Assoc. 1991;86:665–672.
23. Silverman BW. Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Boca Raton: CRC press; 1986.
24. Donner A. A review of inference procedures for the intraclass correlation coefficient in the One-Way random effects model. Int Stat Rev. 1986;54:67–82.
25. Venkataraman K, Tan LS, Bautista DC. Psychometric properties of the problem areas in diabetes (paid) instrument in Singapore. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136759.
26. Gray AM, Rivero-Arias O, Clarke PM. Estimating the association between Sf-12 responses and Eq-5d utility values by response mapping. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:18–29.
27. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V. Mapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sample. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:401–409.
28. Cheung YB, Thumboo J, Gao F. Mapping the English and Chinese versions of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General to the Eq-5d utility index. Value Health. 2009;12:371–376.
29. Gillard PJ, Devine B, Varon SF, Liu L, Sullivan SD. Mapping from disease-specific measures to health-state utility values in individuals with migraine. Value Health. 2012;15:485–494.
30. Cheung YB, Luo N, Ng R, Lee CF. Mapping the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast (FACT-B) to the 5-level EuroQoL Group’s 5-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) utility index in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014;12:180.
31. Chan KK, Willan AR, Gupta M, Pullenayegum E. Underestimation of uncertainties in health utilities derived from mapping algorithms involving health-related quality-of-life measures: statistical explanations and potential remedies. Med Decis Making. 2014;34:863–872.