Psychometric properties of the problem areas in diabetes (PAID) instrument in Singapore

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2015, Pages

  Venkataraman, Kavita ^a   Tan, Luor Shyuan Maudrene ^a   Bautista, Dianne Carrol Tan ^b,c   Griva, Konstadina ^d   Zuniga, Yasmin Laura Marie ^e   Amir, Mohamed ^d   Lee, Yung Seng ^f,g,h   Lee, Jeannette ^a   Tai, E Shyong ^a,e   Khoo, Eric Yin Hao ^e   Wee, Hwee Lin ^a,d  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (Singapore)

^b DUKE NUS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Singapore)

^c SINGAPORE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Singapore)

^d NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^e Dept Medicine Endocrinol Diabet   (Singapore)

^f NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^g NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^h AGENCY FOR SCIENCE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDIT OF DIABETES DEPENDENT QUALITY OF LIFE SCALE; CONCURRENT VALIDITY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DIABETES HEALTH PROFILE PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE; DIABETIC NEPHROPATHY; DIABETIC NEUROPATHY; DIABETIC PATIENT; EFFECT SIZE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; KESSLER PSYCHOLOGICAL DISTRESS SCALE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PROBLEM AREAS IN DIABETES SCALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; RASCH ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SINGAPORE; SINGAPOREAN; SOCIAL INTERACTION; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SINGAPORE; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL;

EID: 84947460430     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136759     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, Welch G, Jacobson AM, Aponte JE, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes care. 1995; 18(6):754-60. PMID: 7555499.
2. Welch GW, Jacobson AM, Polonsky WH. The Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale. An evaluation of its clinical utility. Diabetes care. 1997; 20(5):760-6. PMID: 9135939.
3. Snoek FJ, Pouwer F, Welch GW, Polonsky WH. Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Diabetes care. 2000; 23 (9):1305-9. PMID: 10977023.
4. Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, Polonsky WH. Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabetic medicine: a journal of the British Diabetic Association. 2003; 20(1):69-72. PMID: 12519323.
5. Graue M, Haugstvedt A, Wentzel-Larsen T, Iversen MM, Karlsen B, Rokne B. Diabetes-related emotional distress in adults: reliability and validity of the Norwegian versions of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID) and the Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS). International journal of nursing studies. 2012; 49(2):174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.08.007 PMID: 21924422.
6. Amsberg S, Wredling R, Lins PE, Adamson U, Johansson UB. The psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (Swe-PAID-20): scale development. International journal of nursing studies. 2008; 45(9):1319-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.09.010 PMID: 17983618.
7. Sigurdardottir AK, Benediktsson R. Reliability and validity of the Icelandic version of the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale. International journal of nursing studies. 2008; 45(4):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j. ijnurstu.2006.10.008 PMID: 17161401.
8. Huang MF, Courtney M, Edwards H, McDowell J. Validation of the Chinese version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-C) scale. Diabetes care. 2010; 33(1):38-40. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0768 PMID: 19808922; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2797982.
9. MOH. National Health Survey 2010 Singapore. 2011.
10. Phan TP, Alkema L, Tai ES, tan KHX, Yang Q, Lim WY, et al. Forecasting the burden of type 2 diabetes in Singapore using a demographic epidemiological model of Singapore. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care. 2014; 2:e000012. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2013-000012 PMID: 25452860
11. Aikens JE. Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes care. 2012; 35(12):2472-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0181 PMID: 23033244; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3507577.
12. Vileikyte L, Rubin RR, Leventhal H. Psychological aspects of diabetic neuropathic foot complications: an overview. Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews. 2004; 20 Suppl 1:S13-8. doi: 10.1002/dmrr. 437 PMID: 15150807.
13. Eborall HC, Griffin SJ, Prevost AT, Kinmonth AL, French DP, Sutton S. Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2007; 335(7618):486. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39303.723449.55 PMID: 17761995; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1971192.
14. Park P, Simmons RK, Prevost AT, Griffin SJ. Screening for type 2 diabetes is feasible, acceptable, but associated with increased short-term anxiety: a randomised controlled trial in British general practice. BMC public health. 2008; 8:350. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-350 PMID: 18840266; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2567326.
15. Key Household Income Trends, 2013. In: Department of Statistics S, editor. Singapore2013.
16. Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Krichbaum M, Kubiak T, Haak T. How to screen for depression and emotional problems in patients with diabetes: comparison of screening characteristics of depression questionnaires, measurement of diabetes-specific emotional problems and standard clinical assessment. Diabetologia. 2006; 49(3):469-77. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-0094-2 PMID: 16432706.
17. Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, Hiripi E, Mroczek DK, Normand SL, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological medicine. 2002; 32(6):959-76. PMID: 12214795.
18. Meadows K, Steen N, McColl E, Eccles M, Shiels C, Hewison J, et al. The Diabetes Health Profile (DHP): a new instrument for assessing the psychosocial profile of insulin requiring patients-development and psychometric evaluation. Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 1996; 5(2):242-54. PMID: 8998493.
19. Wee HL, Tan CE, Goh SY, Li SC. Usefulness of the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) questionnaire in patients with diabetes in a multi-ethnic Asian country. Pharmaco Economics. 2006; 24(7):673-82. PMID: 16802843.
20. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
21. Gross CC, Scain SF, Scheffel R, Gross JL, Hutz CS. Brazilian version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (B-PAID): validation and identification of individuals at high risk for emotional distress. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2007; 76(3):455-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.022 PMID: 17081645.
22. Miller ST, Elasy TA. Psychometric evaluation of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) survey in Southern, rural African American women with Type 2 diabetes. BMC public health. 2008; 8:70. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-70 PMID: 18294380; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2268930.
23. Arzhagi SM, Mahjouri MY, Heshmat R, Khashayar P, Larijani B. Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes scale (IR-PAID-20) Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders. 2011; 2011:1-7.
24. Boone WJ, Staver JR, Yale MS. Rasch Analysis in the Human Sciences: Springer Netherlands; 2014.
25. Fayers P, Machin D. Quality of Life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2007.
26. Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Further evidence supporting an SEM-based criterion for identifying meaningful intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1999; 52(9):861-73. PMID: 10529027.
27. Lam CL, Tse EY, Gandek B. Is the standard SF-12 health survey valid and equivalent for a Chinese population? Quality of life research: an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation. 2005; 14(2):539-47. PMID: 15892443.
28. Cohen J. The t-test for measures. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Asscoiates; 1988.
29. Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM, Wolinsky FD. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Medical care. 1999; 37 (5):469-78. PMID: 10335749.
30. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
31. Census of Population 2010 Statistical Release 1. Demographic Characteristics, Education, Language and Religion. In: Statistics Do, editor.: Ministry of Trade & Industry, Republic of Singapore; 2011.