3D augmented reality visualization for navigated osteosynthesis of pelvic fractures;„3D-augmented-reality“-Visualisierung für die navigierte Osteosynthese von Beckenfrakturen

Unfallchirurg

Volumn 121, Issue 4, 2018, Pages 264-270

  Befrui, N ^a   Fischer, M ^a   Fuerst, B ^b   Lee, S C ^b   Fotouhi, J ^b   Weidert, S ^a   Johnson, A ^c   Euler, E ^a   Osgood, G ^c   Navab, N ^b   Bocker W ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Feasibility studies; Kirschner wires; Radiation exposure; Time factors

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FRACTURE; HUMAN; INJURIES; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PELVIC GIRDLE; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; FRACTURES, BONE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PELVIC BONES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85044746474     PISSN: 01775537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00113-018-0466-y     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Routt MC Jr, Simonian PT, Mills WJ (1997) Iliosacral screw fixation: early complications of the percutaneous technique. J Orthop Trauma 11(8):584–589
2. Guy P, Al-Otaibi M, Harvey EJ, Helmy N (2010) The „safe zone“ for extraarticular screw placement during intrapelvic acetabular surgery. J Orthop Trauma 24(5):279–283
3. Stöckle U, Schaser K, König B (2007) Image guidance in pelvic and acetabular surgery expectations, success and limitations. Injury 38(4):450–462
4. Matthews F, Hoigne DJ, Weiser M, Wanner GA, Regazzoni P, Suhm N, Messmer P (2007) Navigating the fluoroscope’s C‑arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow. J Orthop Trauma 21(10):687–692
5. Gebhard FT, Kraus MD, Schneider E, Liener UC, Kinzl L, Arand M (2027) Does computerassisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine 31(17):2024–2006
6. Gras F, Marintschev I, Klos K, Mückley T, Hofmann GO, Kahler DM (2012) Screw placement for acetabular fractures: which navigation modality (2-dimensional vs.3-dimensional) should be used? An experimental study. J Orthop Trauma 26(8):466–473
7. Kraus M, Weiskopf J, Dreyhaupt J, Krischak G, Gebhard F (2015) Computer aided surgery does not increase the accuracy of dorsal pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of 2,003 pedicle screws in a level I trauma center. Global Spine J 5(2):93
8. Dixon BJ, Daly MJ, Chan H et al (2013) Surgeons blinded by enhanced navigation: the effect of augmented reality on attention. Surg Endosc 27:454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2457-3
9. Langlotz F (2004) Potential pitfalls of computer aided orthopedic surgery. Injury 35(1):17–23
10. Wilson MR, Poolton JM, Malhotra N, Ngo K, Bright E, Masters RSW (2011) Development and validation of a surgical workload measure: the Surgery Task Load Index (SURG-TLX). World J Surg 35(9):1961–1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1141-4