Assisted Reproduction and Parental Relationships

Children and their Families: Contact, Rights and Welfare

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 301-311

  Richards, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044690077     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. ANON, My Story (Sheffield Infertility Research Trust, 1991).
2. BARAN, A and PANNAR, R, Lethal Secrets: The Psychology of Donor Insemination (New York, Amisted, 1989).
3. BARTHOLOMEW, GW., ‘The Development and Use of Artificial Insemination’ (1958) 49 The Eugenics Review 187.
4. BHARADWAJ, A, ‘Why Adoption is Not an Option in India: the Visibility of Infertility, the Secrecy of Donor Insemination and Other Cultural Complexities’ (2003) 56 Social Science and Medicine 1867.
5. BLYTH, E, CRAWSHAW, M and SPEIRS, J, Truth and the Child 10 Years On: Information Exchange in Donor Assisted Conception (Birmingham, British Association of Social Workers, 1998).
6. BLYTH, E, ‘Donor Assisted Conception and Donor Offspring Rights to Genetic Origin Information’ (1998) 6 International Journal of Children’s Rights 237.
7. BLYTH, E and HUNT, J, ‘Sharing Genetic Origin Information in Donor Assisted Conception. Views from Licensed Centres on HFEA Donor Information Form’ (1998) 13 Human Reproduction 3274.
8. BREWER, H, ‘Eutelegenesis’ (1935) 27 The Eugenics Review 121.
9. CARSTEN, J, ' “Knowing Where You’ve Come From”: Ruptures and Continuities of Time and Kinship in Narratives of Adoption Reunions’ (2000) 6 Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (NS) 687.
10. CARTER, CO, ‘Eugenic Implications of New Techniques’. in CO Carter (ed), Developments in Human Reproduction and their Eugenic/Ethical Implications (London, Academic Press, 1983).
11. COOK, R and GOLOMBOK, S, ‘A Survey of Semen Donation: Phase 2-The View of Donors’ (1995) 10 Human Reproduction 951.
12. COOK, R, ‘Donating Parenthood: Perspectives on Parenthood from Surrogacy and Gamete Donation’ in A Bainham, S Day Sclater, and M Richards (eds), What is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1999).
13. COOK, R, ‘Villain, Hero or Masked Stranger: Ambivalence in Transactions with Human Gametes’ in A Bainham, S Day Sclater and M Richards (eds), Body Lore and Laws (Hart, Oxford, 2002).
14. Department of Health, Donor Information Consultation, (2001) http://www.doh.gov. uk/gametedonors.
15. DOLGIN, JL, ‘Family Law and the Facts of Family’ in S Yanagisako and C Delaney (eds), Naturalizing Power (New York, Routledge, 1995).
16. Donor Conception Support Group of Australia Inc, Let the Offspring Speak (Georges Hall, NSW, The DC Support Group of Australia, 1997).
17. FREEMAN, M, ‘The New Birth Right?' (1996) 4 International Journal of Children’s Rights 273.
18. GOLOMBOK, S, ‘Parenting and Contemporary Reproductive Technologies’ in MH Bornstein (ed), Handbook of Parenting (Mahwah NJ, Erlbaum, 2002).
19. GOLOMBOK, S, MACCALLUM, FM, GOODMAN, E and RUTTER, M, ‘Families with Children Conceived by Donor Insemination: A Follow Up at Age Twelve’ (2002) 73 Child Development 952.
20. GOTTLIEB, C, LALOS, O and LINDBLAD, E, ‘Disclosure of Donor Insemination to the Child:the Impact of Swedish Legislation’ (2000) 15 Human Reproduction 2052.
21. HAIMES, E, ‘Issues of Gender in Gamete Donation’ (1993) 36 Social Science and Medicine 85.
22. HERRING, J, ‘Giving, Selling and Sharing Bodies’ in A Bainham, S Day Sclater, and M Richards (eds), Body Lore and Laws (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002).
23. HOWE, D and FEAST, J, Adoption, Search and Reunion (London, The Children’s Society, 2000).
24. JOHNSON, M, ‘A Biomedical Perspective on Parenthood’ in A Bainham, S Day Sclater, and M Richards (eds), What is a Parent? A Socio-Legal Analysis (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 1999).
25. LALOS, A, DANIELS, K, GOTTLIEB, C and LALOS, O, ‘Recruitment and motivation of semen providers in Sweden’ (2003) 18 Human Reproduction 212.
26. MACLEAN, S and MACLEAN, M, ‘Secrets in Assisted Reproduction-The Tension Between Donor Anonymity and the Need of the Child for Information’ (1996) 8 Child and Family Law Quarterly 243.
27. MCWINNIE, J, Families Following Assisted Conception. What Do We Tell Our Child? (Dundee, Dept of Law, University of Dundee, 1996).
28. MODELL, JS, Kinship with Strangers. Adoption and Interpretation of Kinship in American Culture (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1994).
29. MULLER, HJ, Out of the Night: A Biologist’s View of the Future (New York, Garland, 1984, originally published in 1936).
30. O’DONOVAN, K, ‘What Shall We Tell the Children? Reflections on Children’s Perspectives and the Reproduction Revolution’ in R Lee and D Morgan (eds), Birthright, Law and Ethics and the Beginning of Life (London, Routledge, 1989).
31. O’NEILL, O, What is Genetic Identity? (Unpublished, 2002) Newnham College, Cambridge.
32. RICHARDS, M, ‘Future Bodies: Some History and Future Prospects for Human Genetic Selection’ in A Bainham, S Day Sclater, and M Richards (eds), Body Lore and Laws (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2002).
33. RICHARDS, MPM, ‘Assisted Reproduction and Genetic Technologies and Family Life’ in J Scott, J Treas, and MPM Richards (eds), Blackwell Companion to the Sociology of Families (Oxford, Blackwell, 2003).
34. SPARKS, C and HAMILTON, JA, ‘Psychological Issues related to Alternative Insemination’ (1991) 22 Professional Psychology Research and Practice 308.
35. STEPTOE, P and EDWARDS, RG, ‘Birth after the Replacement of a Human Embryo’ (1978) ii Lancet 366.
36. WILSON, S, ‘Identity, Genealogy and the Social Family: The Case of Donor Insemination’ (1997) 11 International Journal of Law, Policy & The Family 270.
37. YANAGISAKO, S and DELANEY, C (eds), Naturalizing Power (New York, Routledge, 1995).