Measuring discursive influence across scholarship

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 115, Issue 13, 2018, Pages 3308-3313

  Gerow, Aaron ^a   Hu, Yuening ^b   Boyd Graber, Jordan ^c,d   Blei, David M ^e,f   Evans, James A ^g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b GOOGLE INC   (United States)

^c University of Maryland ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^e Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^f NONE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Probabilistic modeling; Scholarly influence; Science of science

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CITATION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MEDICAL EDUCATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; AWARDS AND PRIZES; PHYSICS; REPORTING BIAS; TRAVEL; WRITING;

EID: 85044400165     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1719792115     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Hirsch JE (2007) Does the h index have predictive power? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:19193–19198.
2. Bergstrom CT, West JD, Wiseman MA (2008) The eigenfactor metrics. J Neurosci 28:11433–11434.
3. Fersht A (2009) The most influential journals: Impact factor and eigenfactor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:6883–6884.
4. Price DdS (1976) A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes. J Am Soc Inf Sci 27:292–306.
5. Wang M, Yu G, Yu D (2008) Measuring the preferential attachment mechanism in citation networks. Phys A 387:4692–4698.
6. Newman MEJ (2004) Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:5200–5205.
7. Alberts B (2013) Impact factor distortions. Science 340:787–787.
8. Wilhite AW, Fong EA (2012) Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science 335:542–543.
9. Wenneras C, Wold A (2001) Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Women, Science, and Technology, eds Wyer M, Barbercheck M, Cookmeyer D, Ozturk H, Wayne M (Routledge, London), pp 46–52.
10. Bartneck C, Kokkelmans S (2010) Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis. Scientometrics 87:85–98.
11. Zhivotovsky L, Krutovsky K (2008) Self-citation can inflate h-index. Scientometrics 77:373–375.
12. Adam D (2002) Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature 415:726–729.
13. Uzzi B, Mukherjee S, Stringer M, Jones B (2013) Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342:468–472.
14. Whalen R et al. (2016) Citation distance: Measuring changes in scientific search strategies. Companion to the 25th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2016) (International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland), pp 419–423.
15. Stringer MJ, Sales-Pardo M, Amaral LAN (2008) Effectiveness of journal ranking schemes as a tool for locating information. PLoS One 3:e1683.
16. MacRoberts MH, MacRoberts BR (2010) Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom-cited influences. J Assoc Inf Sci Technol 61:1–12.
17. Wang D, Song C, Barabási AL (2013) Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science 342:127–132.
18. Althouse BM, West JD, Bergstrom CT, Bergstrom T (2009) Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60:27–34.
19. Harzing AW, Alakangas S, Adams D (2014) hIa: An individual annual h-index to accommodate disciplinary and career length differences. Scientometrics 99:811–821.
20. Blei DM, Lafferty J (2006) Dynamic topic models. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2006) (International Machine Learning Society, La Jolla, CA), pp 113–120.
21. Wang X, McCallum A (2006) Topics over time: A non-Markov continuous-time model of topical trends. Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD 2006) (ACM Press, New York), pp 424–433.
22. Gerrish S, Blei DM (2010) A language-based approach to measuring scholarly impact. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2010) (International Machine Learning Society, La Jolla, CA), pp 375–382.
23. Bird S et al. (2008) The ACL Anthology Reference Corpus: A reference dataset for bibliographic research in computational linguistics. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008) (European Language Resources Association, Paris), pp 1755–1759.
24. Blei DM, Ng AY, Jordan MI (2003) Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res 3:993–1022.
25. Blei DM (2012) Probabilistic topic models. Commun ACM 55:77–84.
26. Griffiths TL, Steyvers M (2004) Finding scientific topics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:5228–5235.
27. Chang J, Gerrish S, Wang C, Boyd-graber JL, Blei DM (2009) Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, eds Bengio Y, Schuurmans D, Lafferty J, Williams C, Culotta A (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, La Jolla, CA), Vol 22, pp 288–296.
28. Wang C, Blei D, Heckerman D (2008) Continuous time dynamic topic models. Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence (UAI 2008) (AUAI Press, Corvallis, OR), pp 579–586.
29. Shwed U, Bearman PS (2010) The temporal structure of scientific consensus formation. Am Sociol Rev 75:817–840.
30. Wallach HM, Murray I, Salakhutdinov R, Mimno D (2009) Evaluation methods for topic models. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2009) (Sage Publications, Los Angeles), pp 1105–1112.
31. Orbanz P, Teh YW (2011) Modern Bayesian nonparametrics. Advances in Neural Information Processing 24, eds Shawe-Taylor J, Zemel RS, Bartlett PL, Pereira F, Weinberger KQ (Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, La Jolla, CA).
32. Orbanz P, Teh YW (2011) Bayesian nonparametric models. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, eds Sammut C, Webb GI (Springer, Berlin), pp 81–89.
33. Bloch F (1946) Nuclear induction. Phys Rev 70:460–474.
34. Wallace PR (1947) The band theory of graphite. Phys Rev 71:622–634.
35. Ke Q, Ferrara E, Radicchi F, Flammini A (2015) Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:7426–7431.
36. Marcus MP, Marcinkiewicz MA, Santorini B (1993) Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Comput Linguist 19:313–330.
37. Cagle FR (1939) A System of marking turtles for future identification. Copeia 1939:170–173.
38. Perrins CM (1965) Population fluctuations and clutch-size in the great tit, Parus major L. J Anim Ecol 34:601–647.
39. Peltzman S (1976) Toward a more general theory of regulation. J Law Econ 19:211–240.