Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production of AgMO3 (M = Ta, Nb, V) perovskite materials using CdS and NiO as co-catalysts

Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry

Volumn 358, Issue , 2018, Pages 167-176

  Carrasco Jaim, Omar A ^a,b   Torres Martínez, Leticia M ^b   Moctezuma, Edgar ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE SAN LUIS POTOSÍ   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE NUEVO LEÓN   (Mexico)

Author keywords

AgTaO3; CdS co catalyst; NiO co catalyst; Perovskite; Photocatalytic hydrogen production

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044095259     PISSN: 10106030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Ehsan, S., Wahid, M.A., Hydrogen production from renewable and sustainable energy resources: promising green energy carrier for clean development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 57 (2016), 850–866, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.112.
2. Colón, G., Towards the hydrogen production by photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 518 (2016), 48–59, 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.11.042.
3. Maeda, K., Photocatalytic water splitting using semiconductor particles: history and recent developments. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev. 12 (2011), 237–268, 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2011.07.001.
4. Fujishima, A., Honda, K., Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238 (1972), 37–38, 10.1038/238037a0.
5. 2 photocatalysis by Cu in hydrogen production from aqueous methanol solution. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 29 (2004), 1601–1605, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2004.02.013.
6. 2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013), 15036–15048, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.09.101.
7. 3 heterostructure for its application in photoelectrochemical water splitting under simulated sunlight illumination. Fuel 166 (2016), 36–41, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.104.
8. 3 nanocrystals. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 38 (2013), 12739–12746, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.072.
9. 3 thin films for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Fuel 197 (2017), 174–185, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.02.016.
10. 3 for visible light photocatalysis predicted from first principles. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 149 (2016), 97–102, 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.01.011.
11. 3 and its photocatalytic performance for hydrogen production. Fuel 130 (2014), 221–227, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.019.
12. 3 prepared by sol-gel method. Catal. Commun. 12 (2010), 268–272, 10.1016/j.catcom.2010.09.032.
13. 3 microspheres for photocatalytic water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014), 13481–13485, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.023.
14. 2 photoreduction. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 136–137 (2013), 89–93, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.02.006.
15. 3 for visible light photocatalysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012), 11611–11617, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.05.038.
16. 3 nanofibers for photocatalytic hydrogen generation. J. Mater. Res. 29 (2013), 123–130, 10.1557/jmr.2013.259.
17. 3 photocatalysts with remarkably enhanced hydrogen production performance. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 200 (2017), 514–520, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.07.049.
18. 3 photocatalysts codoped with antimony and chromium. J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002), 5029–5034, 10.1021/jp0255482.
19. 3 under visible light irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004), 8992–8995, 10.1021/jp049556p.
20. 2 over various tantalate photocatalysts. Catal. Today 78 (2003), 561–569, 10.1016/S0920-5861(02)00355-3.
21. 3. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 40 (2015), 3672–3678, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.01.046.
22. 3/AgBr heterojunction: the relevance of phase and electronic structure. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 426 (2017), 52–59, 10.1016/j.molcata.2016.11.001.
23. 3 as a functional material. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 (2007), 2549–2560, 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.08.007.
24. Tanaka, H., Misono, M., Advances in designing perovskite catalysts. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 5 (2001), 381–387, 10.1016/S1359-0286(01)00035-3.
25. Hu, C.C., Teng, H., Structural features of p-type semiconducting NiO as a co-catalyst for photocatalytic water splitting. J. Catal. 272 (2010), 1–8, 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.03.020.
26. 2 on alkali tantalate photocatalysts ATaO 3 (A = Li, Na, and K). J. Phys. Chem. B 105 (2001), 4285–4292, 10.1021/jp004386b.
27. 2 as cocatalyst under visible light irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008), 7176–7177, 10.1021/ja8007825.
28. 2. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39 (2014), 13421–13428, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.04.020.
29. 2 generation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 201 (2017), 77–83, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.08.027.
30. 2 evolution from lactic acid sacrificial solution under visible light. Chem. Commun., 46, 2010, 7631, 10.1039/c0cc01562h.
31. 3 ceramics. Mater. Chem. Phys. 180 (2016), 422–431, 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.06.026.
32. 3. Phys. Rev. B – Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79 (2009), 1–14, 10.1103/PhysRevB.79.104113.
33. 3 (M: Ta and Nb) with the perovskite structure. J. Phys. Chem. B 106 (2002), 12441–12447.
34. Li, X., Yu, J., Low, J., Fang, Y., Xiao, J., Chen, X., Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 3 (2015), 2485–2534, 10.1039/C4TA04461D.
35. 3 prepared by a sol-gel method. Mater. Res. Bull. 48 (2013), 1618–1626, 10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.01.011.
36. Konta, R., Kato, H., Kobayashi, H., Kudo, A., Photophysical properties and photocatalytic activities under visible light irradiation of silver vanadates. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 5, 2003, 3061, 10.1039/b300179b.
37. 2 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ., 144, 2014, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.06.024 47–45.
38. 3 nanowires. Mater. Res. Bull. 51 (2014), 447–454, 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.01.001.
39. 3 (M = V, Nb, Ta). Mod. Phys. Lett. 28 (2014), 1–12, 10.1142/S0217984914500778.
40. 3 powders: alternative synthesis, characterization and application as photocatalysts for hydrogen evolution from water splitting. Fuel 158 (2015), 66–71, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.05.014.
41. 3: effect of particle surfaces and sizes on photocatalytic activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 214 (2010), 54–60, 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.06.006.
42. 3 (A = Na and K). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32 (2007), 2269–2272, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.10.005.
43. 3 composite with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 273 (2013), 159–166, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.02.004.
44. 3 (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba) photocatalysts. J. Mater. Res. 22 (2007), 1859–1871, 10.1557/jmr.2007.0259.
45. 2 as a co-catalyst for photocatalytic hydrogen production from water. Energy Sci. Eng. 4 (2016), 285–304, 10.1002/ese3.128.
46. 3 particles-effects of nanoscaling. Energy Environ. Sci., 4, 2011, 4270, 10.1039/c1ee02110a.
47. Akin, N., Ozen, Y., Efkere, H.I., Cakmak, M., Ozcelik, S., Surface structure and photoluminescence properties of AZO thin films on polymer substrates. Surf. Interface Anal. 47 (2015), 93–98, 10.1002/sia.5677.
48. Soltani, N., Saion, E., Hussein, M.Z., Erfani, M., Abedini, A., Bahmanrokh, G., Navasery, M., Vaziri, P., Visible light-induced degradation of methylene blue in the presence of photocatalytic ZnS and CdS nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13 (2012), 12242–12258, 10.3390/ijms131012242.
49. 4 photocatalyst for efficient methylene blue degradation using visible light. RSC Adv. 4 (2014), 22491–22496, 10.1039/C4RA01519C.
50. 2 prepared with the sol-gel technique. Chem. Mater. 9 (1997), 2616–2620, 10.1021/cm970279r.
51. Zhang, K., Guo, L., Metal sulphide semiconductors for photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 3 (2013), 1672–1690, 10.1039/C3CY00018D.
52. Wang, M., Shen, S., Li, L., Tang, Z., Yang, J., Effects of sacrificial reagents on photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over different photocatalysts. J. Mater. Sci. 52 (2017), 5155–5164, 10.1007/s10853-017-0752-z.
53. 2. Energy Environ. Sci. 9 (2016), 411–433, 10.1039/C5EE02575C.
54. 2 composite coatings: structural, optical and photocatalytic properties. Mater. Res. Bull. 83 (2016), 217–224, 10.1016/j.materresbull.2016.06.011.