Understanding the impact of external context on community-based implementation of an evidence-based HIV risk reduction intervention

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Hamilton, Alison B ^a,b   Mittman, Brian S ^b,c   Campbell, Danielle ^a   Hutchinson, Craig ^a   Liu, Honghu ^a   Moss, Nicholas J ^d   Wyatt, Gail E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VA GREATER LOS ANGELES HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^c KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

^d Alameda County Public Health Department   (United States)

Author keywords

Community engaged research; External context; HIV prevention; Hybrid; Implementation; Policy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DRAWING; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POVERTY; PREVENTION; REGISTRATION; RISK REDUCTION; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL DETERMINANTS OF HEALTH; STAFF; VULNERABLE POPULATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMMUNITY CARE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROCEDURES; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIV INFECTIONS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION;

EID: 85043770873     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2791-1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Glasgow RE, Eckstein ET, Elzarrad MK. Implementation science perspectives and opportunities for HIV/AIDS research: integrating science, practice, and policy. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(Suppl 1):S26-31.
2. Bowen EA. A multilevel ecological model of HIV risk for people who are homeless or unstably housed and who use drugs in the urban United States. Soc Work Public Health. 2016;31(4):264-75.
3. Paiva V, et al. The current state of play of research on the social, political and legal dimensions of HIV. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(3):477-86.
4. Proctor EK, et al. Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges. Admin Pol Ment Health. 2009;36(1):24-34.
5. Simpson DD, Dansereau DF. Assessing organizational functioning as a step toward innovation. Sci Pract Perspect. 2007;3(2):20-8.
6. Chaudoir SR, Dugan AG, Barr CH. Measuring factors affecting implementation of health innovations: a systematic review of structural, organizational, provider, patient, and innovation level measures. Implement Sci. 2013;8:22.
7. Kaplan HC, et al. The model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ): building a theory of context in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf. 2012;21(1):13-20.
8. Taylor SL, et al. What context features might be important determinants of the effectiveness of patient safety practice interventions? BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20(7):611-7.
9. Alexander JA, Hearld LR. The science of quality improvement implementation: developing capacity to make a difference. Med Care. 2011;49(Suppl):S6-20.
10. Damschroder LJ, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50.
11. El-Bassel N, et al. National Institute of Mental Health multisite Eban HIV/STD prevention intervention for African American HIV Serodiscordant couples: a cluster randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(17):1594-601.
12. Curran GM, et al. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012;50(3):217-26.
13. Hamilton AB, et al. Community-based implementation and effectiveness in a randomized trial of a risk reduction intervention for HIV-serodiscordant couples: study protocol. Implement Sci. 2014;9:79.
14. Isler MR, Corbie-Smith G. Practical steps to community engaged research: from inputs to outcomes. J Law Med Ethics. 2012;40(4):904-14.
15. Elliott DS, Mihalic S. Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prev Sci. 2004;5(1):47-53.
16. Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.
17. Hsieh H-F, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277-88.
18. Keith RE, et al. Using the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) to produce actionable findings: a rapid-cycle evaluation approach to improving implementation. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):15.
19. Ewing, J.A., Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire Jama, 1984. 252(14): p. 1905-7.
20. Needle R, et al. Reliability of self-reported HIV risk behaviors of drug users. Psychol Addict Behav. 1995;9(4):242-50.
21. Cunningham SD, Card JJ. Realities of replication: implementation of evidence-based interventions for HIV prevention in real-world settings. Implement Sci. 2014;9:5.
22. Kojima N, Davey DJ, Klausner JD. Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection and new sexually transmitted infections among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2016;30(14):2251-2.
23. Galeucia M, Hirsch JS. State and local policies as a structural and modifiable determinant of HIV vulnerability among Latino migrants in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(5):800-7.
24. Hardy LJ, Bohan KD, Trotter RT 2nd. Synthesizing evidence-based strategies and community-engaged research: a model to address social determinants of health. Public Health Rep. 2013;128(Suppl 3):68-76.
25. Breslau ES, et al. The implementation road: engaging community partnerships in evidence-based cancer control interventions. Health Promot Pract. 2015;16(1):46-54.