From the Office of a Systematic Review Consultant

Health Environments Research and Design Journal

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 11-14

  Foster, Margaret J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSULTATION; HUMAN; LITERATURE; METHODOLOGY; SOFTWARE;

CONSULTANTS; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85043582504     PISSN: 19375867     EISSN: 21675112     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1937586717749905     Document Type: Editorial

References (9)

1. Booth A., Sutton A., Papaioannou D., (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
2. Campbell Collaboration. (2017). Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MEC2IR) [updated on September 2014]. Author. Retrieved from https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/MEC2IR.html
3. Foster M. J., (2013). Introduction to systematic reviews for healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(1), 143–154.
4. Foster M. J., Jewell S. T., (2017). Assembling the pieces of a systematic review: Guide for librarians. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
5. Gough D., Thomas J., Oliver S., (2012). Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews, 1(28), 1.
6. Higgins J. P. T, Green S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from www.handbook.cochrane.org
7. Higgins J. P. T., Lasserson T., Chandler J., Tovey D., Churchill R., (2017). Methodological Expectations of Cochrane Intervention Reviews (MECIR): Standards for the conduct and reporting of new Cochrane Intervention Reviews, reporting of protocols and the planning, conduct and reporting of updates [updated July 2017]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from http://methods.cochrane.org/mecir
8. Shea B. J., Reeves B. C., Wells G., Thuku M., Hamel C., Moran J., …Henry D. A, (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. British Medical Journal, 358, 1–8.
9. Whiting P., Savović J., Higgins J. P. T., Caldwell D. M., Reeves B. C., Shea B., … Churchill R. (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 69, 225–234.