Introduction to systematic reviews for healthcare design

Health Environments Research and Design Journal

Volumn 7, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages 143-154

  Foster, Margaret J ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evidence based design; Literature review; Methodology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897742091     PISSN: 19375867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/193758671300701s11     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Armstrong, R., Jackson, N., Doyle, J., Waters, E., & Howes, F. (2005). It's in your hands: The value of handsearching in conducting systematic reviews of public health interventions. Journal of Public Health, 27(4), 388-391. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi056
2. Brown, C. P., & Ecoff, L. (2011). A systematic approach to the inclusion of evidence in healthcare design. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), 7-16.
3. Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine, 126(5), 376-380.
4. Cooper H. M., Hedges L. V., & Valentine J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
5. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. (2011). Appraising the evidence. Retrieved from http://www. casp-uk.net/find-appraise-act/appraising-the-evidence/
6. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews. London, England: SAGE.
7. Heller, R. F., Verma, A., Gemmell, I., Harrison, R., Hart, J., & Edwards, R. (2008). Critical appraisal for public health: A new checklist. Public Health, 122(1), 92-98. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.04.012
8. Higgins, J. P. T., Green, S., & Cochrane Collaboration. (2008). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell.
9. Eden, J., Levit, L., Berg, A., Morton, S. (Eds.), Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research, & Institute of Medicine. (2011). Finding what works in health care: Systematic reviews. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-systematic-Reviews.aspx
10. King, R., Hooper, B., & Wood, W. (2011). Using bibliographic software to appraise and code data in educational systematic review research. Medical Teacher, 33(9), 719-723. doi:10.3109/01 42159X.2011.558138
11. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P., Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339(b2700). doi:10.1136/bmj.b2700
12. Mullen, P. D., & Ramirez, G. (2006). The promise and pitfalls of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Public Health, 27, 81-102. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102239
13. Mulrow, C. D., & Cook, D. (Eds.). (1998). Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for health care decisions. Philadelphia, PA: American College of Physicians.
14. Savoie, I., Helmer, D., Green, C. J., & Kazanjian, A. (2003). Beyond Medline: Reducing bias through extended systematic review search. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 19(1), 168-178.
15. Stichler, J. F. (2010). Weighing the evidence. Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(4), 3-7.
16. Weller, A. C. (2004). Mounting evidence that librarians are essential for comprehensive literature searches for meta-analyses and Cochrane reports. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(2), 163-164.