ICP monitoring by open extraventricular drainage: Common practice but not suitable for advanced neuromonitoring and prone to false negativity

Acta Neurochirurgica, Supplementum

Volumn 126, Issue , 2018, Pages 281-286

  Hockel, Konstantin ^a   Schuhmann, Martin U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cerebral autoregulation; Extraventricular drainage; ICP monitoring; Intraparenchymal ICP probe; Probe

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTERIAL PRESSURE; BRAIN PERFUSION; CEREBROSPINAL FLUID DRAINAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROLOGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT; NEUROMONITORING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOFTWARE; VENTRICULOSTOMY; BRAIN CIRCULATION; BRAIN VENTRICLE HEMORRHAGE; FALSE NEGATIVE RESULT; HOMEOSTASIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE;

ARTERIAL PRESSURE; CEREBRAL INTRAVENTRICULAR HEMORRHAGE; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; DRAINAGE; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HOMEOSTASIS; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE; VENTRICULOSTOMY;

EID: 85042915602     PISSN: 00651419     EISSN: 21978395     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-65798-1_55     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Aries MJH, de Jong SF, van Dijk JMC, Regtien J, Depreitere B, Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Elting JWJ. Observation of autoregulation indices during ventricular CSF drainage after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(3):347–54.
2. Jaeger M, Schuhmann MU, Soehle M, Nagel C, Meixensberger J. Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular autoregulation after subarachnoid hemorrhage by brain tissue oxygen pressure reactivity and its relation to delayed cerebral infarction. Stroke. 2007;38(3):981–6.
3. Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al. Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive C. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(Suppl 2):S1–26.
4. Citerio G, Piper I, Chambers IR, Galli D, Enblad P, Kiening K, Ragauskas A, Sahuquillo J, Gregson B, BrainIT Group. Multicenter clinical assessment of the raumedic neurovent-P intracranial pressure sensor: a report by the BrainIT group. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(6):1152–8. discussion 1158
5. Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Pickard JD. Laboratory testing of three intracranial pressure microtransducers: technical report. Neurosurgery. 1996;38(1):219–24.
6. Piper I, Barnes A, Smith D, Dunn L. The Camino intracranial pressure sensor: is it optimal technology? An internal audit with a review of current intracranial pressure monitoring technologies. Neurosurgery. 2001;49(5):1158–64. discussion 1164–5
7. Raabe A, Stöckel R, Hohrein D, Schöche J. Reliability of intraventricular pressure measurement with fiberoptic or solid-state transducers: avoidance of a methodological error. Neurosurgery. 1998;42(1):74–9. discussion 79–80
8. Dimitriou J, Levivier M, Gugliotta M. Comparison of complications in patients receiving different types of intracranial pressure monitoring: a retrospective study in a single center in Switzerland. World Neurosurg. 2016;89:641–6.
9. Kim GS, Amato A, James ML, Britz GW, Zomorodi A, Graffagnino C, Zomorodi M, Olson DM. Continuous and intermittent CSF diversion after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a pilot study. Neurocrit Care. 2011;14(1):68–72.
10. Birch AA, Eynon CA, Schley D. Erroneous intracranial pressure measurements from simultaneous pressure monitoring and ventricular drainage catheters. Neurocrit Care. 2006;5(1):51–4.
11. Vender J, Waller J, Dhandapani K, McDonnell D. An evaluation and comparison of intraventricular, intraparenchymal, and fluid-coupled techniques for intracranial pressure monitoring in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Clin Monit Comput. 2011;25(4):231–6.
12. Wilkinson HA, Yarzebski J, Wilkinson EC, Anderson FA. Erroneous measurement of intracranial pressure caused by simultaneous ventricular drainage: a hydrodynamic model study. Neurosurgery. 1989;24(3):348–54.
13. Howells T, Johnson U, McKelvey T, Ronne-Engström E, Enblad P. The effects of ventricular drainage on the intracranial pressure signal and the pressure reactivity index. J Clin Monit Comput. 2016;31(2):469–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9863-3.
14. Czosnyka M, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Laing RJ, Menon D, Pickard JD. Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. Neurosurgery. 1997;41(1):11–7. discussion 17–9
15. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet (London). 1986;1(8476):307–10.
16. Chambers IR, Siddique MS, Banister K, Mendelow AD. Clinical comparison of the Spiegelberg parenchymal transducer and ventricular fluid pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001;71(3):383–5.