Multicenter clinical assessment of the raumedic Neurovent-P intracranial pressure sensor: A report by the brainIT group

Neurosurgery

Volumn 63, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1152-1158

  Citerio, Giuseppe ^a   Piper, Ian ^b   Chambers, Iain R ^c   Galli, Davide ^a   Enblad, Per ^d   Kiening, Karl ^e   Ragauskas, Arminas ^f   Sahuquillo, Juan ^g   Gregson, Barbara ^h  

^a SAN GERARDO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^f KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Lithuania)

^g HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARI VALL D HEBRON   (Spain)

^h NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intracranial pressure; Multicenter trials; Physiological monitoring; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CATHETER; CATHETER REMOVAL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE MONITORING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSOR; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

BRAIN DISEASES; BRAIN INJURIES; CATHETERIZATION; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EUROPE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE; MANOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL; TRANSDUCERS;

EID: 58149461545     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000335148.87042.D7     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. American National Standards Institute, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation: Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Devices. NS28:1988/(R). Arlington, Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, 2001.
2. Deleted in proof.
3. Chambers KR, Kane PJ, Choksey MS, Mendelow AD: An evaluation of the Camino ventricular bolt system in clinical practice. Neurosurgery 33:866-868, 1993.
4. Citerio G, Piper I, Cormio M, Galli D, Cazzaniga S, Enblad P, Nilsson P, Contant C, Chambers I; BrainIT Group: Bench test assessment of the new Raumedic Neurovent-P ICP sensor: A technical report by the BrainIT group. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146:1221-1226, 2004.
5. Fernades HM, Bingham K, Chambers IR, Mendelow AD: Clinical evaluation of the Codman microsensor intracranial pressure monitoring system. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 71:44-46, 1998.
6. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty of Measurements. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 1995.
7. Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of Measurement Results. Technical note TN1297. Gaithersburg, U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1994.
8. Guillaume J, Janny P: Continuous intracranial manometry; importance of the method and first results. Rev Neurol (Paris) 84:131-142, 1951.
9. Koskinen LO, Olivecrona M: Clinical experience with the intraparenchymal intracranial pressure monitoring Codman MicroSensor system. Neurosurgery 56:693-698, 2005.
10. Lundberg N: Continuous recording and control of ventricular fluid pressure in neurosurgical practice. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 36:1-193, 1960.
11. Martínez-Mañas RM, Santamarta D, de Campos JM, Ferrer E: Camino intracranial pressure monitor: Prospective study of accuracy and complications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 69:82-86, 2000.
12. Measurement and Uncertainty for Metrological Applications. Repeated Measurements and Nested Experiments. ISO/TS 21749:2005. Geneva, International Organization for Standardization, 2005.
13. Morgalla MH, Cuno M, Mettenleiter H, Will BE, Krasznai L, Skalej M, Bitzer M, Grote EH: ICP monitoring with a re-usable transducer: Experimental and clinical evaluation of the Gaeltec ICT/b pressure probe. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:569-573, 1997.
14. Morgalla MH, Krasznai L, Dietz K, Mettenleiter H, Deininger M, Grote EH: Methods of experimental and clinical assessment of the relative measurement accuracy of an intracranial pressure transducer. Technical note. J Neurosurg 95:529-532, 2001.
15. Münch E, Weigel R, Schmiedek P, Schürer L: The Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice: Reliability, handling characteristics and complications. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 140:1113-1120, 1998.
16. Ostrup RC, Luerssen TG, Marshall LF, Zornow MH: Continuous monitoring of intracranial pressure with a miniaturized fiberoptic device. J Neurosurg 67:206-209, 1987.
17. Piper IR, Miller JD: The evaluation of the wave-form analysis capability of a new strain-gauge intracranial pressure MicroSensor. Neurosurgery 36:1142-1145, 1995.
18. Poca MA, Sahuquillo J, Arribas M, Báguena M, Amorós S, Rubio E: Fiberoptic intraparenchymal brain pressure monitoring with the Camino V420 monitor: Reflections on our experience in 163 severely head-injured patients. J Neurotrauma 19:439-448, 2002.
19. Rosner MJ, Becker DP: ICP monitoring: Complications and associated factors. Clin Neurosurg 23:494-519, 1976.
20. Schürer L, Münch E, Piepgras A, Weigel R, Schilling L, Schmiedek P: Assessment of the Camino intracranial pressure device in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 70:296-298, 1997.
21. Signorini DF, Shad A, Piper IR, Statham PF: A clinical evaluation of the Codman MicroSensor for intracranial pressure monitoring. Br J Neurosurg 12:223-227, 1998.
22. Stendel R, Heidenreich J, Schilling A, Akhavan-Sigari R, Kurth R, Picht T, Pietilä T, Suess O, Kern C, Meisel J, Brock M: Clinical evaluation of a new intracranial pressure monitoring device. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 145:185-193, 2003.
23. Weinstabl C, Richling B, Plainer B, Czech T, Spiss CK: Comparative analysis between epidural (Gaeltec) and subdural (Camino) intracranial pressure probes. J Clin Monit 8:116-120, 1992.