From model transformation to model integration based on the algebraic approach to triple graph grammars

Electronic Communications of the EASST

Volumn 10, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Ehrig, Hartmut ^a   Ehrig, Karsten ^b   Hermann, Frank ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Model integration; Model transformation; Syntactical correctness

Indexed keywords

EID: 85042853787     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18632122     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14279/tuj.eceasst.10.154.136     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. H. Ehrig, K. Ehrig, C. Ermel, F. Hermann, G. Taentzer. Information Preserving Bidirectional Model Transformations. In Dwyer and Lopes (eds.), Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering. LNCS 4422, pp. 72-86. Springer, 2007. http://tfs.cs.tu-berlin.de/publikationen/Papers07/EEE+07.pdf
2. H. Ehrig, K. Ehrig, F. Hermann (eds.). From Model Transformation to Model Integration based on the Algebraic Approach to Triple Graph Grammars (Long Version). Februrary 2008. published as Technical Report, TU Berlin, No. 2008-3
3. H. Ehrig, K. Ehrig, U. Prange, G. Taentzer. Fundamentals of Algebraic Graph Transformation. EATCS Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer Verlag, 2006. http://www.springer.com/3-540-31187-4
4. A. Habel, R. Heckel, G. Taentzer. Graph Grammars with Negative Application Conditions. Special issue of Fundamenta Informaticae 26(3, 4):287-313, 1996
5. A. Habel, K.-H. Pennemann. Nested Constraints and Application Conditions for High-Level Structures. In Kreowski et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in Software and Systems Modeling. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3393, pp. 293-308. Springer, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/b106390
6. A. König, A. Schürr. Tool Integration with Triple Graph Grammars-A Survey. In Heckel, R. (eds.): Elsevier Science Publ. (pub.), Proceedings of the SegraVis School on Foundations of Visual Modelling Techniques, Vol. 148, Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science pp. 113-150, Amsterdam. 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.entcs.2005.12.015
7. E. Kindler, R. Wagner. Triple Graph Grammars: Concepts, Extensions, Implementations, and Application Scenarios. Technical report tr-ri-07-284, Software Engineering Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn, June 2007. http://www.uni-paderborn.de/cs/ag-schaefer/Veroeffentlichungen/Quellen/Papers/ 2007/tr-ri-07-284.pdf
8. F. Marschall, P. Braun. Model Transformations for the MDA with BOTL. In Proc. of theWorkshop on Model Driven Architecture: Foundations and Applications (MDAFA 2003), Enschede, The Netherlands. Pp. 25-36. 2003. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/marschall03model.html
9. T. Mens, P. V. Gorp. A Taxonomy of Model Transformation. In Proc. International Workshop on Graph and Model Transformation (GraMoT'05), number 152 in Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Tallinn, Estonia, Elsevier Science. 2006. http://tfs.cs.tu-berlin.de/gramot/Gramot2005/FinalVersions/PDF/MensVanGorp.pdf
10. OMG. Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 Query/View/Transformation Specification, Final Adopted Specification (07-07-2007). 2007. http://www.omg.org/docs/ptc/07-07-07.pdf
11. G. Rozenberg (ed.). Handbook of Graph Grammars and Computing by Graph Transformations, Volume 1: Foundations. World Scientific, 1997
12. A. Schürr. Specification of Graph Translators with Triple Graph Grammars. In G. Tinhofer, editor, WG94 20th Int. Workshop on Graph-Theoretic Concepts in Computer Science, volume 903 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 151-163, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg. 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59071-4 45