Radiation dose from X-ray examinations of impacted canines: Cone beam CT vs two-dimensional imaging

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2018, Pages

  Kadesjö, Nils ^a,b   Lynds, Randi ^c,d   Nilsson, Mats ^e   Shi, Xie Qi ^a,d  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c STOCKHOLM COUNTY COUNCIL   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^e LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

CBCT; Effective dose; Impacted canine; Intraoral X ray; Panoramic X ray

Indexed keywords

CANINE TOOTH; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGING PHANTOM; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; RADIATION DOSE; TOOTH DISEASE;

CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CUSPID; HUMANS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; TOOTH, IMPACTED;

EID: 85042628325     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20170305     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Kramer RM, Williams AC. The incidence of impacted teeth. A survey at Harlem hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970;29:237-41.
2. Dachi SF, Howell FV. A survey of 3, 874 routine full-mouth radiographs. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1961;14:1165-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(61)90204-3
3. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Lambrechts P, Loozen G, Willems G. Root resorption of the maxillary lateral incisor caused by impacted canine: a literature review. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:247-55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-009-0262-8
4. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:93-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq034
5. Botticelli S, Verna C, Cattaneo PM, Heidmann J, Melsen B. Twoversus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod 2011;33:344-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq102
6. Guerrero ME, Shahbazian M, Elsiena Bekkering G, Nackaerts O, Jacobs R, Horner K. The diagnostic efficacy of cone beam CT for impacted teeth and associated features: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:208-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2842.2010.02141.x
7. Haney E, Gansky SA, Lee JS, Johnson E, Maki K, Miller AJ, et al. Comparative analysis of traditional radiographs and conebeam computed tomography volumetric images in the diagnosis and treatment planning of maxillary impacted canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:590-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.06.035
8. Koye V, Grondahl HG. Characteristics of patients referred for Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) of ectopically erupting maxillary canines. Swed Dent J 2011;35:159-65.
9. European Commission. Radiation protection 172: Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology. In: Evidence Based Guidelines; 2012.
10. Ericson S, Kurol PJ. Resorption of incisors after ectopic eruption of maxillary canines: a CT study. Angle Orthod 2000;70:415-23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2000)070<0415:ROIAEE& gt;2.0.CO;2
11. Husain J, Burden D, McSherry P, Morris D, Allen M.Clinical Standards Committee of the Faculty of Dental Surgery, Royal College of Surgeons of England National clinical guidelines for management of the palatally ectopic maxillary canine. Br Dent J 2012;213:171-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.726
12. Christell H, Birch S, Bondemark L, Horner K, Lindh C.SEDENTEXCT consortium The impact of Cone Beam CT on financial costs and orthodontists' treatment decisions in the management of maxillary canines with eruption disturbance. Eur J Orthod 2017; doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx039
13. European Commission Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology: Evidence Based Guidelines. Radiation Protection Publication 2012;172.
14. Looe HK, Eenboom F, Chofor N, Pfaffenberger A, Steinhoff M, Ruhmann A, et al. Conversion coefficients for the estimation of effective doses in intraoral and panoramic dental radiology from dose-area product values. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;131:365-73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncn172
15. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL, Howerton WB. Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:219-26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/14340323
16. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al.SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:267-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028
17. Theodorakou C, Walker A, Horner K, Pauwels R, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R.SEDENTEXCT Project Consortium Estimation of paediatric organ and effective doses from dental cone beam CT using anthropomorphic phantoms. Br J Radiol 2012;85:153-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/19389412
18. Davis AT, Safi H, Maddison SM. The reduction of dose in paediatric panoramic radiography: the impact of collimator height and programme selection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44:20140223. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr. 20140223
19. Al-Okshi A, Nilsson M, Petersson A, Wiese M, Lindh C. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2013;42:20120343. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr. 20120343
20. Hellen-Halme K, Nilsson M. The effects on absorbed dose distribution in intraoral X-ray imaging when using tube voltages of 60 and 70 kV for bitewing imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Res 2013;4: e2. doi:https://doi.org/10.5037/jomr.2013.4302
21. Ma CM, Coffey CW, DeWerd LA, Liu C, Nath R, Seltzer SM, et al.American Association of Physicists in Medicine AAPM protocol for 40-300 kV x-ray beam dosimetry in radiotherapy and radiobiology. Med Phys 2001;28:868. doi:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1374247
22. Cristy M. Active bone marrow distribution as a function of age in humans. Phys Med Biol 1981;26:389-400. doi:https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/26/3/003
23. ICRP Adult reference computational phantoms. ICRP Publication 110. Ann ICRP 2009;39:1-165.
24. ICRP The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37:1-332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icrp.2007.10.003
25. Rampado O, Garelli E, Ropolo R. Computed tomography dose measurements with radiochromic films and a flatbed scanner. Med Phys 2010;37:189-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3271584
26. Tomic N, Quintero C, Whiting BR, Aldelaijan S, Bekerat H, Liang L, et al. Characterization of calibration curves and energy dependence GafChromicTM XR-QA2 model based radiochromic film dosimetry system. Med Phys 2014;41:62105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4876295
27. Alqerban A, Willems G, Bernaerts C, Vangastel J, Politis C, Jacobs R. Orthodontic treatment planning for impacted maxillary canines using conventional records versus 3D CBCT. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:698-707. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjt100
28. Wriedt S, Jaklin J, Al-Nawas B, Wehrbein H. Impacted upper canines: examination and treatment proposal based on 3D versus 2D diagnosis. J Orofac Orthop 2012;73:28-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-011-0058-8
29. Hidalgo Rivas JA, Horner K, Thiruvenkatachari B, Davies J, Theodorakou C. Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children. Br J Radiol 2015;88:20150559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr. 20150559
30. Rampado O, Bianchi SD, Peruzzo Cornetto A, Rossetti V, Ropolo R. Radiochromic films for dental CT dosimetry: a feasibility study. Phys Med 2014;30:18-24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2012.06.002
31. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32:229-34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/26310390
32. Mattsson S. Need for individual cancer risk estimates in X-ray and nuclear medicine imaging. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2016;169:11-16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncw034
33. Brenner DJ. Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/22942198
34. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA Radiogenic Cancer Risk Models and Projections for the U.S. Population Report No: EPA Publication 402-R-11-001.2011.