Conflict of Interest in Journal Peer Review

Toxicologic Pathology

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 112-114

  Resnik, David B ^a   Elmore, Susan A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

conflict of interest; ethics; journal policy; peer review

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITORIAL; ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFIT; PUBLIC HEALTH; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; ETHICS; PUBLISHING;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85042530728     PISSN: 01926233     EISSN: 15331601     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192623318754792     Document Type: Editorial

References (20)

1. Anraku A., Jin Y. P., Trope G. E., Buys Y. M., (2009). Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Ophthalmology 116, 1093–96.
2. Baggs J. G., Broome M. E., Dougherty M. C., Freda M. C., Kearney M. H., (2008). Blinding in peer review: The preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. J Adv Nurs 64, 131–38.
3. Bekelman J. E., Li Y., Gross C. P., (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: A systematic review. JAMA 289, 454–65.
4. Blum J. A., Freeman K., Dart R. C., Cooper R. J., (2009). Requirements and definitions in conflict of interest policies of medical journals. JAMA 302, 2230–34.
5. Bornmann L., Daniel H. D., (2010). Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics. PLoS One 5, e13345.
6. Bosch X., Pericas J. M., Hernandez C., Doti P., (2013). Financial, nonfinancial and editors’ conflicts of interest in high-impact biomedical journals. Eur J Clin Invest 43, 660–67.
7. Cho M. K., Justice A. C., Winker M. A., Berlin J. A., Waeckerle J. F., Callaham M. L., Rennie D., (1998). Masking author identity in peer review: What factors influence masking success? PEER Investigators. JAMA 280, 243–45.
8. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2016). A Short Guide to Ethical Editing for New Editors. Accessed October 30, 2017. https://publicationethics.org/files/A_Short_Guide_to_Ethical_Editing.pdf.
9. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2017). COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. Accessed October 30, 2017. https://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_Guidelines_For_Peer_Reviewers_2.pdf.
10. Cooper R. J., Gupta M., Wilkes M. S., Hoffman J. R., (2006). Conflict of interest disclosure policies and practices in peer-reviewed biomedical journals. J Gen Intern Med 21, 1248–52.
11. Liu J. J., Bell C. M., Matelski J. J., Detsky A. S., Cram P., (2017). Payments by US pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to US medical journal editors: Retrospective observational study. BMJ 359, j4619.
12. Lo B., Field M. J., (2009). Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. National Academies Press, Washington, DC. Accessed December 4, 2017. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22942/.
13. National Institutes of Health. (2014). NIH Policy for Managing Conflict of Interest in the Peer Review of Concepts and Proposals for Research and Development Contract Projects, Notice Number: NOT-OD-14-069. Accessed October 25, 2017. https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-14-069.html.
14. Resnik D. B., Elmore S. A., (2016). Ensuring the quality, fairness, and integrity of journal peer review: A possible role of editors. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 169–88.
15. Resnik D. B., Konecny B., Kissling G. E., (2017). Conflict of interest and funding disclosure policies of environmental, occupational, and public health journals. J Occup Environ Med 59, 28–33.
16. Schroter S., Tite L., Hutchings A., Black N., (2006). Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors. JAMA 295, 314–17.
17. Shamoo A. E., Resnik D. B., (2015). Responsible Conduct of Research, 3rd ed. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
18. Thompson D. F., (1993). Understanding financial conflicts of interest. N Engl J Med 329, 573–76.
19. van Rooyen S., Godlee F., Evans S., Smith R., Black N., (1998). Effect of blinding and unmasking on the quality of peer review: A randomized trial. JAMA 280, 234–37.
20. Wager E., Parkin E. C., Tamber P. S. (2006). Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. BMC Med 4, 13.