Driver adaptation to lane keeping assistance systems: Do drivers become less vigilant?

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Volumn 2017-October, Issue , 2017, Pages 1934-1938

  Miller, Erika E ^a   Boyle, Linda Ng ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMAN REACTION TIME; INFORMATION USE; NASA; REMOTELY OPERATED VEHICLES;

ASSISTANCE SYSTEM; COGNITIVE WORKLOADS; CONTROL GROUPS; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; LONGITUDINAL DRIVING; SEMI-AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; TREATMENT GROUP;

ERGONOMICS;

EID: 85042481966     PISSN: 10711813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1177/1541931213601963     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Brookhuis, K. A., deWaard, D., & Janssen, W. H. (2001). Behavioural impacts of advanced driver assistance systems-an overview. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 1(3), 245-253.
2. Carsten, O., Lai, F. C. H., Barnard, Y., Jamson, A. H., & Merat, N. (2012). Control task substitution in semi-automated driving: Does it matter what aspects are automated. Human Factors, 54(5), 747-761.
3. Casner, S. M., and Geven., R. W., Recker, M. P., & Schooler, J. W. (2014). The retention of manual flying skills in the automated cockpit. Human Factors, 56(8), 1506-1516.
4. Casner, S. M., and Hutchins., E. L., & Norman, D. (2016). The challenges of partially automated driving. Communications of the ACM, 59(5), 70-77.
5. Jenness, J. W., and Lerner., N. D., Mazor, S., Osberg, J. S., & Tefft, B. C. (2007). Use of advanced in-vehicle technology by young and older early adopters. survey results on sensor-based backing aid systems and rear-view video cameras (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 810 828). Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
6. Lee, J. D., and Young., K. L., & Regan, M. A. (2009). Defining driver distraction. In M. A. Regan, J. D. Lee, & K. Young (Eds.), Driver distraction: Theory, effects, and mitigation. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group.
7. NHTSA. (2011). Crash warning interface metrics, phase 2 (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 811 471). Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
8. Robinson, E., Lerner, N., Jenness, J., Singer, J., Huey, R., Baldwin, C.,⋯ Monk, C. (2011). Crash warning interface metrics: Task 2 report: Empirical studies of efforts of dvi variability (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 811 470b). Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
9. Rudin-Brown, C. M., & Noy, Y. I. (2014). Investigation of behavioral adaption to lane departure warnings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1803, 30-37.
10. Staubach, M. (2009). Factors correlated with traffic accidents as a basis for evaluating advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 41, 1025-1033.
11. Suzuki, K., & Jansson, H. (2003). An analysis of drivers steering behaviour during auditory or haptic warnings for the designing of lane departure warning system. Journal of Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan, 24, 65-70.
12. Wochinger, K., Binder, S., Traube, E., Band, D., & Foley, J. (2008). Human factors forum on advanced vehicle safety technologies-summary and proceedings (Tech. Rep. No. DOT HS 810 918). Washington DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration