Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services

Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 35-43

  Wang, Catharine ^a   Cahill, Tiernan J ^a   Parlato, Andrew ^a   Wertz, Blake ^a   Zhong, Qiankun ^a   Cunningham, Tricia Norkunas ^a   Cummings, James J ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

direct to consumer; genetic testing; precision medicine; raw DNA; social media; third party interpretation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; DECISION MAKING; DNA SEQUENCE; ECONOMICS; ETHICS; FEMALE; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCREENING TEST; SOCIAL MEDIA; UTILIZATION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER SCREENING AND TESTING; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOCIAL MEDIA; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85042354979     PISSN: None     EISSN: 23249269     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.340     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bettinger, B. (2013). What else can I do with my DNA test results? Retrieved from http://thegeneticgenealogist.com/2013/09/22/what-else-can-i-do-with-my-dna-test-results/
2. Brett, G. R., Metcalfe, S. A., Amor, D. J., & Halliday, J. L. (2012). An exploration of genetic health professionals’ experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice. European Journal of Human Genetics, 20(8), 825–830.
3. Cariaso, M., & Lennon, G. (2012). SNPedia: A wiki supporting personal genome annotation, interpretation and analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(Database issue), D1308–D1312.
4. Carroll, J. C., Makuwaza, T., Manca, D. P., et al. (2016). Primary care providers’ experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine. Canadian Family Physician, 62(10), e626–e635.
5. Collins, F. S., & Varmus, H. (2015). A new initiative on precision medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 372(9), 793–795.
6. Darst, B. F., Madlensky, L., Schork, N. J., Topol, E. J., & Bloss, C. S. (2014). Characteristics of genomic test consumers who spontaneously share results with their health care provider. Health Communication, 29(1), 105–108.
7. Food and Drug Administration (2017). FDA allows marketing of first direct-to-consumer tests that provide genetic risk information for certain conditions. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm551185.htm
8. Kirkpatrick, B. E., & Rashkin, M. D. (2017). Ancestry testing and the practice of genetic counseling. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 26(1), 6–20.
9. Koeller, D. R., Uhlmann, W. R., Carere, D. A., Green, R. C., Roberts, J. S., & PGen Study Group. 2017. Utilization of genetic counseling after direct-to-consumer genetic testing: Findings from the impact of personal genomics (PGen) study. Journal of Genetic Counseling, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-017-0106-7.
10. Mainous, A. G. 3rd, Johnson, S. P., Chirina, S., & Baker, R. (2013). Academic family physicians’ perception of genetic testing and integration into practice: A CERA study. Family Medicine, 45(4), 257–262.
11. National Institutes of Health (2017). Return of genetic results in the all of us research program (Day 1). Retrieved from https://videocast.nih.gov/summary.asp?live=21883&bhcp=1
12. Powell, K. P., Christianson, C. A., Cogswell, W. A., et al. (2012). Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(3), 469–478.
13. Powell, K., Cogswell, W., Christianson, C., et al. (2012). Primary care physicians’ awareness, experience and opinions of direct-to-consumer genetic testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 21(1), 113–126.
14. Regalado, A. (2014). How a Wiki is keeping direct-to-consumer genetics alive. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/531461/how-a-wiki-is-keeping-direct-to-consumer-genetics-alive/
15. Roberts, J., Gornick, M., Carere, D., Uhlmann, W., Ruffin, M., & Green, R. (2017). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: User motivations, decision making, and perceived utility of results. Public Health Genomics, 20(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000455006
16. Roberts, J. S., & Ostergren, J. (2013). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and personal genomics services: A review of recent empirical studies. Current Genetic Medicine Reports, 1(3), 182–200.
17. van der Wouden, C. H., Carere, D. A., Maitland-van der Zee, A. H., Ruffin, M. T., Roberts, J. S., Green, R. C., & Impact of Personal Genomics Study Group. (2016). Consumer perceptions of interactions with primary care providers after direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing. Annals of Internal Medicine, 164(8), 513–522.
18. 23andyou.com. Retrieved from http://www.23andyou.com/3rdparty