Meta- Analysis of postoperative outcome parameters comparing descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty

Cornea

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 1445-1451

  Pavlovic, Ivana ^a   Shajari, Mehdi ^a   Herrmann, Eva ^a   Schmack, Ingo ^a   Lencova, Anna ^a   Kohnen, Thomas ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty; Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty; Dmek; DSAEK; Endothelial keratoplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEST CORRECTED VISUAL ACUITY; DESCEMET MEMBRANE ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; GLAUCOMA; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; MACULAR EDEMA; META ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CORNEA DISEASE; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSPLANTATION; VISUAL ACUITY;

CORNEAL DISEASES; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 85042254672     PISSN: 02773740     EISSN: 15364798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001384     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta- Analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1-e34.
2. Chen M, Swinney C, Chen M. Comparing the intraoperative complication rate of femtosecond laser- Assisted cataract surgery to traditional phacoemulsification. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015;8:201-203.
3. Phillips PM, Phillips LJ, Muthappan V, et al. Experienced DSAEK surgeon's transition to DMEK: outcomes comparing the last 100 DSAEK surgeries with the first 100 DMEK surgeries exclusively using previously published techniques. Cornea. 2017;36:275-279.
4. Bhandari V, Reddy JK, Relekar K, et al. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty in the fellow eye for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: A retrospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:750567.
5. Goldich Y, Artornsombidth P, Avni-Zauberman N, et al. Fellow eye comparison of corneal thickness and curvature in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2014;33:547-550.
6. Goldich Y, Showail M, Avni-Zauberman N, et al. Contralateral eye comparison of descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty and descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:155.e1-159.e1.
7. Green M, Wilkins MR. Comparison of early surgical experience and visual outcomes of DSAEK and DMEK. Cornea. 2015;34:1341-1344.
8. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2011; 30:1382-1386.
9. Hamzaoglu EC, Straiko MD, Mayko ZM, et al. The first 100 eyes of standardized descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus standardized descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:2193-2199.
10. Maier AK, Gundlach E, Gonnermann J, et al. Retrospective contralateral study comparing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty withDescemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Eye (Lond). 2015;29:327-332.
11. Price MO, Knight OJ, Benetz BA, et al. Randomized, prospective, single-masked clinical trial of endothelial keratoplasty performance with 2 donor cornea 4°C storage solutions and associated chambers. Cornea. 2015;34:253-256.
12. Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:528-535.
13. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:1082.e2-1090.e2.
14. Heinzelmann S, Böhringer D, Eberwein P, et al. Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254:515-522.
15. Droutsas K, Lazaridis A, Papaconstantinou D, et al. Visual outcomes after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty-comparison of specific matched pairs. Cornea. 2016;35:765-771.
16. Dickman MM, Peeters JM, van Den Biggelaar FJ, et al. Changing practice patterns and long term outcomes of endothelial versus penetrating keratoplasty: A prospective Dutch Registry study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;170:133-142.
17. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:536-540.
18. Ham L, Dapena I, Liarakos VS, et al. Midterm results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 4 to 7 years clinical outcome. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;171:113-121.
19. Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, et al. Graft rejection after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:90-94.
20. Shih CY, Ritterband DC, Rubino S, et al. Visually significant and nonsignificant complications arising from Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;148:837-843.
21. Suh LH, Yoo SH, Deobhakta A, et al. Complications of Descemet's stripping with automated endothelial keratoplasty: survey of 118 eyes at One Institute. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1517-1524.
22. Wu EI, Ritterband DC, Yu G, et al. Graft rejection following descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: features, risk factors, and outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153:949-957.
23. Dapena I, Yeh R-Y, Baydoun L, et al. Potential causes of incomplete visual rehabilitation at 6 months postoperative after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:780-788.
24. Rodríguez-Calvo-de-Mora M, Quilendrino R, Ham L, et al. Clinical outcome of 500 consecutive cases undergoing Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:464-470.
25. Schaub F, Enders P, Snijders K, et al. One-year outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) comparing sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) 20% versus 100% air for anterior chamber tamponade. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:902-908.
26. Nahum Y, Leon P, Mimouni M, et al. Factors associated with graft detachment after primary descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea. 2017;36:265-268.
27. Röck T, Bramkamp M, Bartz-Schmidt KU, et al. Causes that influence the detachment rate after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015;253:2217-2222.
28. Tourtas T, Schlomberg J, Wessel JM, et al. Graft adhesion in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's descemet membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132:155-161.
29. Heinzelmann S, Maier P, Böhringer D, et al. Cystoid macular oedema following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:98-102.
30. de Sanctis U, Alovisi C, Bauchiero L, et al. Changing trends in corneal graft surgery: A ten-year review. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:48-52.