The First 100 Eyes of Standardized Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty versus Standardized Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

Ophthalmology

Volumn 122, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2193-2199

  Hamzaoglu, Ebru C ^a   Straiko, Michael D ^a   Mayko, Zachary M ^b   Sáles, Christopher S ^a   Terry, Mark A ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Lions VisionGift ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CELL DENSITY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA DYSTROPHY; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; DESCEMET MEMBRANE ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; FEMALE; GRAFT FAILURE; GRAFT REJECTION; HUMAN; IATROGENIC DISEASE; MALE; ORGAN DONOR; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEROID THERAPY; VISUAL ACUITY; CATARACT EXTRACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORNEA ENDOTHELIUM; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; DONOR; FUCHS' ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; LENS IMPLANTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STANDARDS; TRANSPLANTATION;

AGED; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; DESCEMET MEMBRANE; DESCEMET STRIPPING ENDOTHELIAL KERATOPLASTY; ENDOTHELIUM, CORNEAL; FEMALE; FUCHS' ENDOTHELIAL DYSTROPHY; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; LENS IMPLANTATION, INTRAOCULAR; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TISSUE DONORS; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84939528270     PISSN: 01616420     EISSN: 15494713     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Endothelial replacement without surface corneal incisions or sutures: topography of the deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty procedure. Cornea 2001;20:14-8.
2. Terry MA, Ousley PJ. Deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty visual acuity, astigmatism, and endothelial survival in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1541-8.
3. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: clinical outcomes in the two years following deep lamellar endothelial keratoplasty (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2007;105:530-63.
4. Gorovoy MS. Descemet-stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2006;25:886-9.
5. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: comparative outcomes with microkeratomedissected and manually dissected donor tissue. Ophthalmology 2006;113:1936-42.
6. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty a simplified technique tominimize graft dislocation, iatrogenic graft failure, and pupillary block. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1179-86.
7. Li JY, Terry MA, Goshe J, et al. Three-year visual acuity outcomes after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1126-9.
8. Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B, van der Wees J. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006;25: 987-90.
9. Dapena I, Ham L, Droutsas K, et al. Learning curve in Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty: first series of 135 consecutive cases. Ophthalmology 2011;118:2147-54.
10. TerryMA, Shamie N, Chen ES, et al. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs' dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology 2009;116:631-9.
11. Terry MA, Straiko MD, Veldman PB, et al. Standardized DMEK technique: reducing complications using prestripped tissue, novel glass injector, and sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. Cornea 2015;34:845-52.
12. Yoeruek E, Bayyoud T, Hofmann J, Bartz-Schmidt KU. Novel maneuver facilitating Descemet membrane unfolding in the anterior chamber. Cornea 2013;32:370-3.
13. Scorcia V, Matteoni S, Scorcia GB, et al. Pentacam assessment of posterior lamellar grafts to explain hyperopization after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1651-5.
14. Bahar I, Kaiserman I, Livny E, et al. Changes in corneal curvatures and anterior segment parameters after descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Cur Eye Res 2010;35:961-6.
15. Lombardo M, TerryMA, Lombardo G, et al. Analysis of posterior donor corneal parameters 1 year after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) triple procedure. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:421-7.
16. Esquenazi S, RandW. Effect of the shape of the endothelial graft on the refractive results after Descemet's strippingwith automated endothelial keratoplasty. Can J Ophthalmol 2009;44:557-61.
17. Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Corneal higherorder aberrations after Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012;119:528-35.
18. Melles GR, Lander F, Rietveld FJ. Transplantation of Descemet's membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Cornea 2002;21:415-8.
19. Melles GR. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 2006;25:879-81.
20. Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW Jr. Risk of corneal transplant rejection significantly reduced with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2012;119:536-40.
21. Terry MA. Endothelial keratoplasty: why aren't we all doing Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty? Cornea 2012;31:469-71.
22. Ham L, Dapena I, van Luijk C, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy: review of the first 50 consecutive cases. Eye (Lond) 2009;23:1990-8.
23. Droutsas K, Ham L, Dapena I, et al. [Visual acuity following Descemet-membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): first 100 cases operated on for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy]. Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde 2010;227:467-77.
24. Dapena I, Dapena L, Dirisamer M, et al. [Visual acuity and endothelial cell density following Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)]. Archivos de la Sociedad Espanola de Oftalmologia 2011;86:395-401.
25. Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES, et al. Precut tissue for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty: vision, astigmatism, and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009;116:248-56.
26. Price MO, Baig KM, Brubaker JW, Price FW Jr. Randomized, prospective comparison of precut vs surgeon-dissected grafts for descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2008;146:36-41.
27. Busin M, Madi S, Santorum P, et al. Ultrathin Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty with the microkeratome double-pass technique: two-year outcomes. Ophthalmology 2013;120:1186-94.
28. Phillips PM, Phillips LJ, Much JW, Maloney C. Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: six-month results of the first 100 consecutive surgeries performed solo by a surgeon using 1 technique with 100% follow-up. Cornea 2012;31: 1361-4.
29. Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA, et al. Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. Ophthalmology 2010;117:438-44.
30. Price MO, Price FW Jr. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty influencing factors and 2-year trend. Ophthalmology 2008;115:857-65.
31. Terry MA, Chen ES, Shamie N, et al. Endothelial cell loss after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty in a large prospective series. Ophthalmology 2008;115: 488-496. e483.
32. Ham L, van Luijk C, Dapena I, et al. Endothelial cell density after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1-to 2-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:521-7.
33. Terry MA, Li J, Goshe J, Davis-Boozer D. Endothelial keratoplasty: the relationship between donor tissue size and donor endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1944-9.
34. Tourtas T, Laaser K, Bachmann BO, et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty versus descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:1082-1090. e1082.
35. Guerra FP, Anshu A, Price MO, Price FW. Endothelial keratoplasty: fellow eyes comparison of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2011;30:1382-6.
36. Guell JL, Morral M, Gris O, et al. Bimanual technique for insertion and positioning of endothelium-Descemet membrane graft in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Cornea 2013;32:1521-6.
37. Kruse FE, Schrehardt US, Tourtas T. Optimizing outcomes with Descemet's membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014;25:325-34.
38. Dapena I, Moutsouris K, Droutsas K, et al. Standardized "notouch" technique for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:88-94.
39. Arnalich-Montiel F, Munoz-Negrete FJ, De Miguel MP. Double port injector device to reduce endothelial damage in DMEK. Eye (Lond) 2014;28:748-51.
40. Tourtas T, Schlomberg J, Wessel JM, et al. Graft adhesion in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty dependent on size of removal of host's descemet membrane. JAMA Ophthalmol 2014;132:155-61.