Correction: Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys. [Trials. (2018), 19 (113)] DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2493-y;Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys

Trials

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2018, Pages

  Biggane, Alice M ^a,b,c   Brading, Lucy ^a   Ravaud, Philippe ^b,d,e,f   Young, Bridget ^a   Williamson, Paula R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b PARIS DESCARTES UNIVERSITY   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research ^*  (France)

^e HÔTEL DIEU   (France)

^f Department of Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Core outcome sets; Delphi; Patient engagement; Patient participation; Survey

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELPHI STUDY; E-MAIL; HUMAN; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; FACTUAL DATABASE; INTERVIEW; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CONSENSUS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MULTICENTER STUDIES AS TOPIC; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85042143905     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17456215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-018-2595-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (18)

1. Clarke M, Williamson PR. Core outcome sets and systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):1.
2. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Kirkham J, Dwan K, Kramer S, Green S, Forbes A. Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:Mr000035.
3. Williamson P. Core outcome sets will improve the quality of obstetrics research. BJOG. 2014;121(10):1196.
4. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JP, Oliver S. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet. 2014;383(9912):156-65.
5. Chalmers I, Glasziou P. Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(6):1341-5.
6. Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Gargon E. Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012;17(1):1-2.
7. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, Clarke M, Gargon E, Gorst S, Harman N. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(3):280.
8. Kirkham JJ, Davis K, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Tunis S, Williamson PR. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations. PLoS Med. 2017;14(11):e1002447.
9. Young B, Bagley H. Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates. Res Involvement Engagement. 2016;2(1):25.
10. Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, Moher D, Schmitt J, Tugwell P. Core Outcome Set-STAndards for reporting: the COS-STAR statement. PLoS Med. 2016;13(10):e1002148.
11. Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99111.
12. Gorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Blazeby JM, Altman DG, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0146444.
13. Gorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Smith V, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and identification of gaps. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168403.
14. Kirwan JR, Minnock P, Adebajo A, Bresnihan B, Choy E, De Wit M, Hazes M, Richards P, Saag K, Suarez-Almazor M. Patient perspective: fatigue as a recommended patient centered outcome measure in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2007;34(5):1174-7.
15. Sinha IP, Gallagher R, Williamson PR, Smyth RL. Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in childhood asthma: a survey of clinicians, parents, and young people. Trials. 2012;13(1):1.
16. Gargon E, Williamson PR, Young B. Improving core outcome set development: qualitative interviews with developers provided pointers to inform guidance. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;86:140-52.
17. SurveyMonkey LLC. SurveyMonkey®. Palo Alto: SurveyMonkey, LLC; 2012.
18. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, DiGuiseppi C, Wentz R, Kwan I, Cooper R, Felix LM, Pratap S. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(3). Art. No.: MR000008. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub4.