Managing urban ecological land as properties: Conceptual model, public perceptions, and willingness to pay

Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Volumn 133, Issue , 2018, Pages 21-29

  Wang, Yutao ^a,b   Li, Xiao ^a,c   Sun, Mingxing ^a,d   Yu, Huajun ^a,b  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Institute of Eco Chongming   (China)

^c Yale University   (United States)

^d TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; Public awareness; Urban green space; Urban sustainability; Willingness to pay

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEMS; HOUSING; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GOVERNMENT FUNDING; PROPERTY; PUBLIC AREAS; PUBLIC AWARENESS; PUBLIC PERCEPTION; RESIDENTIAL AREAS; URBAN GREEN SPACES; URBAN SUSTAINABILITY; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GREENSPACE; PERCEPTION; POLICY MAKING; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN AREA; WILLINGNESS TO PAY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; CHINA; ECOSYSTEM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; FUNDING; GOVERNMENT; HOUSEHOLD; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MANAGEMENT; PERCEPTION; PUBLIC OPINION; RESIDENTIAL AREA;

CHINA; DONGYING; SHANDONG;

EID: 85041812488     PISSN: 09213449     EISSN: 18790658     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.038     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Achtnicht, M., German car buyers’ willingness to pay to reduce CO2 emissions. Clim. Change 113:3–4 (2012), 679–697.
2. Arrow, K.J., Solow, R., Portney, P.R., Leamer, E.E., Radner, R., Schuman, H., Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed. Regist. 58 (1993), 48–56.
3. Balmford, A., Bruner, A., Cooper, P., Costanza, R., Farber, S., Green, R.E., Munro, K., Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297:5583 (2002), 950–953.
4. Bertram, C., Rehdanz, K., The role of urban green space for human well-being. Ecol. Econ. 120 (2015), 139–152.
5. Carson, R.T., Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History. 2011, Edward Elgar, Northampton, MA.
6. Carson, R.T., Contingent valuation: a practical alternative when prices aren't available. J. Econ. Perspect. 26:4 (2012), 27–42.
7. Chang, J., Qu, Z., Xu, R., Pan, K., Xu, B., Min, Y., Ren, Y., Yang, G., Ge, Y., Assessing the ecosystem services provided by urban green spaces along urban center-edge gradients. Sci. Rep.-UK, 2017, 7.
8. Colding, J., ‘Ecological land-use complementation’ for building resilience in urban ecosystems. Landc. Urban Plan. 81 (2007), 46–55.
9. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Braat, L., Kubiszewski, I., Fioramonti, L., Sutton, P., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Twenty years of ecosystem services: how far have we come and how far do we still need to go?. Ecosyst. Serv. 28 (2017), 1–16.
10. Foley, J.A., DeFries, R., Asner, G.P., Barford, C., Bonan, G., Carpenter, S.R., Chapin, F.S., Coe, M.T., Daily, G.C., Gibbs, H.K., Helkowski, J.H., Holloway, T., Howard, E.A., Kucharik, C.J., Monfreda, C., Patz, J.A., Prentice, I.C., Ramankutty, N., Snyder, P.K., Global consequences of land use. Science, 309, 2005, 570.
11. Hardin, G., The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1968, 1243.
12. La Rosa, D., Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol. Ind. 42 (2014), 122–134.
13. Li, F., Ye, Y., Song, B., Wang, R., Evaluation of urban suitable ecological land based on the minimum cumulative resistance model: a case study from Changzhou, China. Ecol. Model. 318 (2015), 194–203.
14. Li, F., Liu, H., Huisingh, D., Wang, Y., Wang, R., Shifting to healthier cities with improved urban ecological infrastructure: from the perspectives of planning, implementation, governance and engineering. J. Clean. Prod. 163 (2017), S1–S11.
15. Li, Y., Zhan, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhang, M., Response of ecosystem services to land use and cover change: a case study in Chengdu City. Resour. Ronserv. Recycl., 2017.
16. Liu, J., Li, S., Ouyang, Z., Tam, C., Chen, X., Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105 (2008), 9477–9482.
17. Liu, Y., Xiao, H., Lv, Y., Zhang, N., The effect of new-type urbanization on energy consumption in China: a spatial econometric analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 163 (2017), S299–S305.
18. Long, H., Liu, Y., Hou, X., Li, T., Li, Y., Effects of land use transitions due to rapid urbanization on ecosystem services: implications for urban planning in the new developing area of China. Habitat Int. 44 (2014), 536–544.
19. Ma, S., Wang, R., The social-economic-natural complex ecosystem. Acta Ecol. Sin., 1, 1984 (in Chinese). 2006.
20. Maas, J., Verheij, R.A., Groenewegen, P.P., de Vries, S., Spreeuwenberg, P., Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 60 (2006), 587–592.
21. Mitchell, R.C., Carson, R.T., Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resour. Future, 1989 Washington DC.
22. Moon, W., Florkowski, W.J., Brückner, B., Schonhof, I., Willingness to pay for environmental practices: implications for eco-labeling. Land Econ. 78:1 (2002), 88–102.
23. Pagiola, S., Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecol. Econ. 65 (2008), 712–724.
24. Scheaffer, R.L., Mendenhall, W., Ott, L., Elementary Survey Sampling. 5th ed., 1996, PWS-Kent, Boston.
25. Silvennoinen, S., Taka, M., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Koivusalo, H., Ollikainen, M., Setälä, H., Monetary value of urban green space as an ecosystem service provider: a case study of urban runoff management in Finland. Ecosyst. Serv. 28 (2017), 17–27.
26. Sims, R.A., Corns, I.G.W., Klinka, K., Introduction – global to local: ecological land classification. Environ. Monit. Asses. 39 (1996), 1–10.
27. Sun, M., Yuan, Y., Zhang, J., Wang, R., Wang, Y., Greenhouse gas emissions estimation and ways to mitigate emissions in the Yellow River delta high-efficient eco-economic zone, China. J. Clean. Prod. 81 (2014), 89–102.
28. Swanwick, C., Dunnett, N., Woolley, H., Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environ. 29 (2003), 94–106.
29. Torgler, B., Garcia-Valiñas, M.A., The determinants of individuals’ attitudes towards preventing environmental damage. Ecol. Econ. 63:2 (2007), 536–552.
30. Wang, R.S., Li, F., Han, B.L., Huang, H.P., Yin, K., Urban eco-complex and eco-space management. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecol. Sin. 34 (2014), 1–11.
31. Wang, Y., Sun, M., Song, B., Public perceptions of and willingness to pay for sponge city initiatives in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 122 (2017), 11–20.
32. Wolch, J.R., Byrne, J., Newell, J.P., Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: the challenge of making cities ‘just green enough'. Landsc. Urban Plann. 125 (2014), 234–244.
33. Wong, C.P., Jiang, B., Kinzig, A.P., Lee, K.N., Ouyang, Z., Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecol. Lett. 18:1 (2015), 108–118.
34. Wunder, S., Engel, S., Pagiola, S., Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecol. Econ. 65 (2008), 834–852.
35. Zhang, D., Huang, Q., He, C., Wu, J., Impacts of urban expansion on ecosystem services in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration, China: a scenario analysis based on the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 125 (2017), 115–130.
36. Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Wang, C., Wang, R., Li, F., Quantifying the emergy flow of an urban complex and the ecological services of a satellite town: a case study of Zengcheng, China. J. Clean Prod. 163 (2017), S267–S276.